Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM

Wow, Tareq. That sunrise shot is spectacular!

terriyaki wrote in post #4432063
Wow, Tareq. That sunrise shot is spectacular!

Thank you very much.
not much pp, handheld, and i got little better shots in same place.

A couple from the Norfolk Botanical Gardens

Couple from where I live...NYC!

Pic of some interesting light resulting in an even more interesting pic!

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED

Im torn between buying the 24-105 or the 17-55 IS to go with my 70-200 f/4 IS..they are both the same price.......decisions decisions....

get the 17-55 cos theres no overlap with your current lens and those 2 lengths are perfect partners
if you get the 24 you will wish you had a wider end

anthonyl wrote in post #4443023
Im torn between buying the 24-105 or the 17-55 IS to go with my 70-200 f/4 IS..they are both the same price.......decisions decisions....

When you have a 40D, there's nothing better than 17-55


Here's my contribution for the 24-105:

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

somethingsimple wrote in post #4443117
get the 17-55 cos theres no overlap with your current lens and those 2 lengths are perfect partners
if you get the 24 you will wish you had a wider end

well actually I have the same problem, I have the 10-22, 17-55 60 macro and 70-200
So no coverage from 56 to 59 and from 61 to 69mm

overlap is good to fill in the gaps later but first i think its best to get the major focal lengths and extremes, so as to be less restricted

anthonyl wrote in post #4443023
Im torn between buying the 24-105 or the 17-55 IS to go with my 70-200 f/4 IS..they are both the same price.......decisions decisions....

I ended up selling my 70-200 F4 because I rarely used it. Reaching 105 was almost always enough for me and swapping to gain 200 was rarely worth it.

Now I'm considering swapping the 24-105 for the 24-70 once I can afford the 70-200 2.8 IS. I'm thinking with my kids growing up the 70-200 2.8 IS will be a killer sports lens and portrait lens... and the 24-70 would be the ultimate companion.

All that being said, I think if I did sell off my 24-105 I'd really miss it. It's a fantastic "leave on the body" lens.

HTTP response: 403 | MIME changed to 'text/html'

I just added this lens to my collection today. Here are a few of the first few shots:

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

5D, 24-105 >>> ISO1600

I bought this lens because of this thread! Fantastic photos in here! I hope to improve to that level some day, here's my 1st contribution (crop and basic PP done):

30D, f/11, 1/400, iso 100