Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 25 May 2015 (Monday) 05:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

AV Mode Problem

 
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
May 25, 2015 05:50 |  #1

This isn't a wedding photography question per se, but it did happen while I was shooting a wedding :-) Any idea why I would get images like this when shooting in AV mode, Auto ISO and using spot metering taken off the brides cheek closest to camera?? Plus, when trying to bring it up in ACR, it's got a really green tinge to it. Thanks in advance for any help!

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/05/4/LQ_729395.jpg
Image hosted by forum (729395) © Michelle Brooks Photography [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DunnoWhen
Goldmember
Avatar
1,748 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Mar 2006
Location: South Wales
     
May 25, 2015 07:23 |  #2

If you spot metered the cheek, then you would have needed to add at least one stop of exposure compensation to get near an accurate exposure.

What does it look like if you boost it in post by 1 - 1.5 stops.?


My wisdom is learned from the experience of others.
...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
May 25, 2015 07:32 as a reply to  @ DunnoWhen's post |  #3

I'm not sure I understand - the cheek is dark, so why wouldn't the auto ISO have bumped up enough to expose properly? Here is what it looks like bumped up 1.5 in ACR (see the awful greenish tone?).

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/05/4/LQ_729406.jpg
Image hosted by forum (729406) © Michelle Brooks Photography [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,946 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2873
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
May 25, 2015 07:39 as a reply to  @ Michelle Brooks Photography's post |  #4

It's possible the greenish tone may have been caused by simultaneous contrast from the heavy, bright green foliage. As far as the underexposure goes, is it possible that your spot metering may have hit the much brighter dress itself in stead of her face? That could account for the severe underexposure.

If I understand AUTO ISO correctly, it would not have bumped up the exposure automatically to a correct level because it doesn't "know" what you want the overall correct level ofthe picture in it's entirety. It just reacts to the point where you are metering.


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DunnoWhen
Goldmember
Avatar
1,748 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Mar 2006
Location: South Wales
Post edited over 8 years ago by DunnoWhen.
     
May 25, 2015 07:41 |  #5

The caucasian skin is not 18% grey reflective and therefore, if you spot meter caucasian skin, you need to compensate for this fact by increasing exposure by 1-2 stops (check histogram - adjust).

Edit.

I should add that, given the distance you are from the subject, and assuming that the spot meter of you camera is probably 3degrees, you will have metered an area greater than the cheek. If you don't have a hand held meter, the next time you have similar conditions, get very close to the subject and spot meter so you know you are metering exactly what you want, then lock that exposure and walk away to get the framing you want( don't release the exposure as you change position). Having said that, you might find it easier to shoot in manual mode.


My wisdom is learned from the experience of others.
...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Overread
Goldmember
Avatar
2,268 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 94
Joined Mar 2010
     
May 25, 2015 07:51 |  #6

Considering that the cheek closest to the camera is dark black nearly I would also guess that you caught the dress not the cheek with the metering. And as such the camera exposed for that white dress and everything else got sent into darkness.

A quick fix in the moment to check the LCD and adjust as needed since this clearly went "wrong". Another approach is to use a handheld meter and, since the light is falling on you and the subject the same (ergo its the sun) you could use an incident reading to set the exposure.


Tools of the trade: Canon 400D, Canon 7D, Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L M2, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS, Canon MPE 65mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro, Tamron 24-70mm f2.4, Sigma 70mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 8-16mm f4.5-5.6, Raynox DCR 250, loads of teleconverters and a flashy thingy too
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
May 25, 2015 09:24 |  #7

I suppose it is possible that in this image the metering may have incorrectly gotten put on the dress, not the cheek, but here is another image, zoomed in, that I know for sure the metering was taken off the face not the dress (DunnoWhen thanks fo rthat reminder about the skin).
I used to shoot entirely in M mode but switched to AV (unless using OCF) & found it much easier to get wedding images quickly exposed well - except in this case of course, lol!

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/05/4/LQ_729427.jpg
Image hosted by forum (729427) © Michelle Brooks Photography [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Overread
Goldmember
Avatar
2,268 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 94
Joined Mar 2010
     
May 25, 2015 09:56 |  #8

If you were using spot metering mode most Canon cameras spot meter the middle AF point only (I think some of the newer can move it around). So might be its doing it right but you're taking the meter reading off the brightest point.

Spot metering can be difficult to use - get it wrong by even a little and you can get results like this; its why many oft use spot metering just to read the light in a scene (say before doing an HDR and deciding how big the dynamic range is) whilst using things like centre weighted average for regular shots.


Tools of the trade: Canon 400D, Canon 7D, Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L M2, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS, Canon MPE 65mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro, Tamron 24-70mm f2.4, Sigma 70mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 8-16mm f4.5-5.6, Raynox DCR 250, loads of teleconverters and a flashy thingy too
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
Post edited over 8 years ago by Michelle Brooks Photography.
     
May 25, 2015 10:00 as a reply to  @ Overread's post |  #9

I will def check my manual on this - could explain everything! Thanks for the tip.

Edit: Manual & Youtube :-) Metering is set to the center for Spot Metering UNLESS you change it in camera to link it to the active AF point; checked my settings & I had done that. Another consideration is if you are set to Automatic Point Selection or Zone AF modes, it will return to center metering. My AF Area Select mode is set to Expand AF Area:Surround and Spot AF. So, if I'm reading all this right, my spot metering SHOULD have been reading from my AF point, not the center.


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Post edited over 8 years ago by tim.
     
May 25, 2015 15:25 |  #10

Could be something like a minimum shutter speed being applied by some software in the camera. Could be spot metering has found a little highlight and has metered that. Can you post full exif?

Check your histogram when you change scenes. Stop using spot metering, it's not appropriate for many situations, use center weighted or something else.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
May 25, 2015 17:27 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #11

Date: 5/23/15
Time: 2:45:23 PM
Latitude:
Longitude:
Well, Tim, you just helped me solve the mystery - check out the Exposure compensation :oops: It had been really bright inside & apparently I forgot for a while to change it back.


Model: Canon EOS-1D X
Serial #: 222010000504
Firmware: Firmware Version 2.0.3
Frame #: 9068
Lens (mm): 200
ISO: 200
Aperture: 4.5
Shutter: 1/8000
Exp. Comp.: -3.3
Flash Comp.:
Program: Aperture Priority
Focus Mode: AI Servo AF
White Bal.: Flash
ICC Profile: sRGB Profile
Contrast: 0
Sharpening:
Quality: Raw


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 25, 2015 18:12 |  #12

Tim is wise. Check your histogram!

EC shouldn't be used because it's bright inside, EC should be used to tell the camera that the contents of the frame is dark (negative EC) or light (positive EC). Using it as a single control to tweak your exposure could cause problems. I suspect your use of spot metering is involved here. Go do some experimenting in wedding-like conditions, outside a wedding. Use evaluative and center weighted metering, shoot white, black, and pink (people) subjects. Shoot reflective objects with and without flash, with the flash pointing towards and away from the subject. Shoot glass. Shoot with lights in the frame, both in the center and at the edge. Basically - experiment :)


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4201
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
May 26, 2015 15:36 |  #13

There is an ol Saying that's always true.

AV will always get you close but manual get you there.

I shoot AV a ton. But sometimes that camera will go ape for no reason. AV mode its trying to meter to get 18% grey for the scene. If you metered on that bride with that much light its going to go crazy at times...And I have no explanation why either.

I always get close with AV in the middle. 90% of the time its perfect. Typically with a flash involved im 1/3 -2/3 in AV and adjusting flash output to taste. But after a test shot I would look at the exif date in INFO and see a dark image like this and look for shutter speed problems and switch it to manual and get the shot.

AV always gets you in the ball park when in the middle. At that point you can dial in with exposure compensation or switch to manual. This is the problem with auto modes and the cameras trying to make everything 18%. Its not always going to be right. One of its disadvantages. The advantage is i quicker and faster 90% of the time....Its a trade off.. So being the smart photographer that I know you are, you kick it into manual, get your shot, and move on to the next opportunity.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/05/4/LQ_729679.jpg
Image hosted by forum (729679) © umphotography [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crissoft
Member
48 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Resita, Romania
     
Jun 07, 2015 09:54 |  #14

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #17570962 (external link)
Date: 5/23/15


Exp. Comp.: -3.3



R6, RF 24-105 f/4 L, 40mm Art, 105mm Art, 85mm f/1.2 L II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,425 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4521
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 8 years ago by Wilt. (11 edits in all)
     
Jun 07, 2015 10:52 |  #15

This thread points to the failing of many photographers, to ALWAYS BE AWARE of what your camera is doing whether it is on Manual or on any Automatic setting!

  • If on Manual, you are ensuring that your exposure combination is resulting in the meter needle being 'ABOUT CENTERED', and if it is not centered at the time you KNOW WHY it is not centered to indicate what the meter thinks 'proper exposure' (because you are deliberately biasing for exposure compensation reasons) -- or you adjust it.
  • If on Automatic, you are ensuring that whatever parameter which is under the camera control (e.g. shutter speed, as one example) is an acceptable one to you for the shot being taken.
  • If on Automatic, you know that an EC value is cranked into the camera or not, and you understand why any EC for biasig the shot being metered is appropriate to the shot being taken.
  • If using flash, you know that an FEC value is cranked into the camera or not, and you understand why any FEC for biasing the shot being flashed is appropriate to the shot being taken.


The key word is AWARENESS of the camera, and SUITABILITY of the settings to the shot being taken.
With awareness, you will at times detect that ...

  • inadvertantly the camera blinking at you for under-/overexposure (even though it is in an automatic mode), because it is needing a parameter adjusted which currently out of its range.
  • inadverantly the camera is using an aperture too big/small, a shutter speed too slow/fast, an ISO too high/low
  • inadvertantly the camera meter is biased from an EC value 'left over' from another shot or because you simply bumped the control
  • inadvertantly the camera meter is biased from an FEC value 'left over' from another shot or because you simply bumped the control

...and catch the Oops shots! Checking the histograms periodically is to cross check your AWARENESS, because we all have our "Oops, forgot to check (whatever)..." moments. When you shoot RAW, your shots will more often be 'about right' and needing only minor tweaks in postprocessing. When the 'Oops' is too large, adjusting RAW too much might fix the shot well enough to get by, but it will nevertheless be compromised in some way from optimum.

Just because the camera is on any automatic mode is not a reason for your BRAIN to be in OFF.
Always BE AWARE and in total control of your exposures to minimize the "Oops!" discovered long after it is too late to take a recovery shot.

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,808 views & 3 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
AV Mode Problem
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
815 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.