Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 25 May 2015 (Monday) 15:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

52mm for supertelephoto - gel

 
uOpt
Goldmember
Avatar
2,283 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Boston, MA, USA
     
May 25, 2015 15:24 |  #1

My used 300 f/2.8 IS1 came with a 52mm drop-in gel filter. My understanding is that this is standard.

I wonder whether I would gain a amount-of-light advantage by removing it for darker situations?

What does the gel filter actually do except catching some dirt that might enter the lens if it wasn't there? The optical properties of the gel are not clear to me.


My imagine composition sucks. I need a heavier lens.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
May 25, 2015 15:32 |  #2

Was there actually a filter in the filter holder, or do you have just the filter holder? If there's anything in there other than a UV or skylight filter, it is costing you some light and maybe a color cast. But you don't need anything in there at all.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
4,092 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 657
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
May 25, 2015 17:14 |  #3

According to Canon the gel filter is part of the optical setup of the lens and should be left in place unless replaced by one of their other "Drop in Filters".
Having said that I used to have an old (Original) Canon EF 400 F2.8 L and the Gel filter was pretty ropey certainly not helping IQ at all! I removed the (manky) filter and subtly applied a small ball hammer. Results were absolutely fine!
I do not recommend this procedure! However you could simply remove it, place some insulation tape over the hole, give it a try and see what you think - you can always put it back in if the results are not as good.


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
uOpt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,283 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by uOpt.
     
May 27, 2015 11:10 |  #4

Yes, I read that you aren't supposed to just dump the filter. In that case they talk about the glass filter. In my particular case I received a used lens with just the gelatin filter in a holder.

But I have no idea of the gelatin filtering is supposed to do in the first place :D

I can't easily test without without leaving the lens open.


My imagine composition sucks. I need a heavier lens.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,912 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10102
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by CyberDyneSystems. (2 edits in all)
     
May 27, 2015 11:38 |  #5

So I don't have any manuals in front of me, but I thought the "optical path" wording was all related to what used to be the stock clear GLASS filter, and NOT a gel filter.

In the MkII IS super telephotos, (and I was certain this was also true of the MkI IS units) the holders that come installed with the lens are the screw in holder, that take screw in filters and the stock one that comes with it is clear optical glass.


The Gelatin filters were options.

This is the filter that was stock for the Version II
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …_Filter.html/pr​m/alsVwDtl (external link)

and this one was stock for version I IS lenses, (I believe they are mostly interchangeable)
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …In_Filter_Holde​r_for.html (external link)

Going all the way back to the Pre-IS version, like the 200mm f/1.8 and 300mm f/2.8L non IS, the drop in filter was 48mm, and the stock unit on early units was the gel holder, with a piece of glass "clipped in". On later units the screw in holder with glass filter was included.


That said, according to B&H The current 200mm f/2L IS comes with the drop in gel filter only, so this has me scratching my head, as all VII IS models claim to come with the drop in screw holder.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
May 27, 2015 18:05 |  #6

Like Jake, I remember the "filter must be there" as referring to glass filters; gels aren't thick enough, or consistent enough in thickness or surface, to make a predictable difference to your lens' performance, so better to omit them altogether if you don't need a specific one.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
uOpt
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,283 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Boston, MA, USA
     
May 28, 2015 13:29 |  #7

I think I expressed that wrong. I realized that the original "requirement" refers to the glass filter. Which I didn't get with my lens.

I just don't get what the gelatin filter is supposed to do in the first place :) Sorry.


My imagine composition sucks. I need a heavier lens.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,912 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10102
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by CyberDyneSystems.
     
May 28, 2015 14:03 |  #8

You can test by removing the gel from the filter and replacing the empty filter, or by "leaving it open" if this bothers you (dust) some gaf tape would leave no residue, and last perhaps years, definitively months.

On my 500mm, it certainly appears to work just fine with no filter in the optical path, but the af distance shifts (if I recall correctly) The ie: you still get an in focus shot, but when you remove the filter, it will re-focus to get back in focus.

I was wrong about the "stock" item that came with this generation lens. The supplied filter is always the "gel holder" drop in, BUT they are supposed to have the same clear glass filter already installed in the gel holder.

On both my 500mm and 200mm the stock "gel filter holder" has a clear glass plate installed. The Gel I think it supposed to go in with it, not instead of the glass.


Does your gel drop in holder have the glass? If not, I'd suggest getting yourself one of the clear glass filters.
If there is a gel in there you can remove it.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stargazer77517
Goldmember
Avatar
1,430 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Santa Fe Texas
     
May 29, 2015 08:50 |  #9

Mine has a Gel filter also. I just removed the gel part and just use the holder with nothing. No problem with my images. I also have a CPL and ND filter with holders also.


Davis (Fred)
My Gallery http://davisbourque.ze​nfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
11,829 posts
Gallery: 263 photos
Likes: 5991
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
May 29, 2015 23:59 |  #10

user manual here if it helps: http://gdlp01.c-wss.com …/01/ef400f28lis​usm-en.pdf (external link)


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,792 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
52mm for supertelephoto - gel
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is EBiffany
1592 guests, 96 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.