Sony A7x lounge

navydoc wrote in post #17953255
Excellent capture and great 3D pop of the foreground in this shot Eddie.

Thanks Gene. Heres another

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/FFVa​Xz

thenextguy wrote in post #17953310
Two new (F)E-mount lenses.

http://www.dpreview.co​m …4-5-5-6-full-frame-lenses

mystik610 wrote in post #17953315
http://www.sonyalpharu​mors.com …d-50mm-f1-8-prime-lenses/

Nice to see Sony bring some affordable stuff to market after the sticker shock of the GM lenses.

Makes me wonder if a budget friendly FF camera might be on the way soon (a6?)

$250 for a 50mm f/1.8 is great. I wish they had announced a cheaper 85mm though or a 35 f/2!. A cheaper than GM/Batis 85 1.8 in the same vain as the FE28 would suit me nicely and I would probably get rid of the Sigma (assuming it would be much smaller)

Sorry for spamming. Posting these as fast as I can edit them. Got my feet wet on this one

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/ESmJ​6d

xpfloyd wrote in post #17953336
Sorry for spamming. Posting these as fast as I can edit them. Got my feet wet on this one

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/ESmJ​6d Pucks Glen III by xpfloyd, on Flickr

Phenomenal Eddie!

mystik610 wrote in post #17953341
Phenomenal Eddie!

Thanks Carlo

Carlo - Can you post an image of the Batis 25, Batis 85 and Loxia 21 side by side?

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/FMPA​Qk

thenextguy wrote in post #17953310
Two new (F)E-mount lenses.

http://www.dpreview.co​m …4-5-5-6-full-frame-lenses

$250 nifty fifty sounds good. $1,200 70-300 f/4.5-5.6 doesn't. Canon has their 70-300 f/4-5.6 for $450 and Nikon has theirs fpr around the same.

TMaG82 wrote in post #17953355
$250 nifty fifty sounds good. $1,200 70-300 f/4.5-5.6 doesn't. Canon has their 70-300 f/4-5.6 for $450 and Nikon has theirs fpr around the same.

Given that the Sony 70-300 is a G lens, I suspect it's supposed to compete with Canons L version which is $1249.

I wish A7rii would offer S-RAW and M-RAW kind of options. I find it a little odd that you can choose between compressed and uncompressed raw, but the difference between the two is effectively small, unless you're into pixel peeping (or big big prints). I move around a lot and therefore do all of my PP work on a laptop. And the laptop HW space being limited still these days, the A7rii raw file size is sometimes an overkill. I know the silent shutter mode delivers smaller files. But it also takes away from the dynamic range. Sometimes I wish I had the same DR available but with fewer megapixels.

Heres a Pano taken at the same location of the shot previous. 3 shots at 16mm. In hindsight I should have shot in portrait mode as the resulting image has odd dimensions

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/FFZi​UP

Awesome shots Eddie!

Used my 70-200 II the other day to grab some candids of my son. Let me know if WB is off. I always struggle with skin tones.

IMAGE LINK: https://alfredomora.sm​ugmug.com …-fqvnD/i-pmLNqqb&lb=1&s=A

Kade Christian

Just in case my request got lost in the image posts can anyone that owns the FE 16-35 and Batis 25 and Loxia 21 or any two of those lenses post a side by side photo so that I can see how they compare for size. I know their dimensions but its easier to see in an image

xpfloyd wrote in post #17953400
Just in case my request got lost in the image posts can anyone that owns the FE 16-35 and Batis 25 and Loxia 21 or any two of those lenses post a side by side photo so that I can see how they compare for size. I know their dimensions but its easier to see in an image

Not sure if this is useful https://www.flickr.com …1507560663/in/d​ateposted/

xpfloyd wrote in post #17953400
Just in case my request got lost in the image posts can anyone that owns the FE 16-35 and Batis 25 and Loxia 21 or any two of those lenses post a side by side photo so that I can see how they compare for size. I know their dimensions but its easier to see in an image

This may help

https://www.google.com …C#imgrc=ml3fDhQ​4HnpOEM%3A

http://www.mirrorlesso​ns.com …loxia-21mm-vs-batis-25mm/

OoDee wrote in post #17953369
I wish A7rii would offer S-RAW and M-RAW kind of options. I find it a little odd that you can choose between compressed and uncompressed raw, but the difference between the two is effectively small, unless you're into pixel peeping (or big big prints). I move around a lot and therefore do all of my PP work on a laptop. And the laptop HW space being limited still these days, the A7rii raw file size is sometimes an overkill. I know the silent shutter mode delivers smaller files. But it also takes away from the dynamic range. Sometimes I wish I had the same DR available but with fewer megapixels.

Hosted photo: posted by OoDee in
./showthread.php?p=179​53369&i=i87644915
forum: Sony Digital Cameras

If you have the right lens, shoot it in Crop mode = 18Mpix

friends don't let friends shoot in mRaw or sRaw - Canon's implementation truly butchers shadow recovery ability and turns them horrible colours