Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Digital Cameras 
Thread started 27 May 2015 (Wednesday) 18:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sony A7x lounge

 
wallstreetoneil
Goldmember
Avatar
2,086 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 1219
Joined Nov 2014
Location: Toronto Canada
     
May 14, 2016 08:54 as a reply to  @ post 18006711 |  #17551

I love the Sigma 24-105 - it is beyond awesome in my opinion. I bought it specifically to use on my 5DSR because of the IS and the fact that it is very center sharp at all FL and easily out resolves the Canon 24-105 - especially at the longer portrait focal lengths - obviously the two downsides are lack of weather sealing and the weight. I have a wedding next weekend and I am going to go with 1 main camera, my new 1DX II with the Sigma - because the venue won't require a 70-200. That said, I will use the A7Rii with the Canon 24-70 F2.8 II during the ceremony because I like to shoot in silent mode and IBIS gives me a stabilized Canon. I have to update my sig because I just traded in the 135L to buy my new 1Dx II. I'm at a bit of a cross roads lens wise because with the 5DSR I really want IS lenses and the 135L is impossible on that camera at normal SS - on the A7R II it is awesome. I was looking at the new Tamron 1.8 VC, but something is just not right with the VC - it is creating blurs at 'normal' shutter speeds on the 5DSR.


Hockey and wedding photographer. Favourite camera / lens combos: a 1DX II with a Tamron 45 1.8 VC, an A7Rii with a Canon 24-70F2.8L II, and a 5DSR with a Tamron 85 1.8 VC. Every lens I own I strongly recommend [Canon (35Lii, 100L Macro, 24-70F2.8ii, 70-200F2.8ii, 100-400Lii), Tamron (45 1.8, 85 1.8), Sigma 24-105]. If there are better lenses out there let me know because I haven't found them.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nekrosoft13
Goldmember
Avatar
4,087 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 683
Joined Jun 2010
     
May 14, 2016 09:26 |  #17552
bannedPermanent ban

navydoc wrote in post #18006051 (external link)
My brisket was done in less time than I expected, probably due to it's size I imagine. After it reached the 203° mark, I took it off the grill and placed it, still wrapped, in my igloo cooler to allow it to rest and let the juices flow back into the muscle fibers (temp dropped a couple of degrees by the time I took this photo).

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/GHj2​yQ  (external link) Cooler resting (external link) by Gene (external link), on Flickr

After about 30 minutes in the cooler (to keep it warm in this case), I unwrapped the brisket and sliced against the grain. Then, the all important taste test.

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/H8tY​S8  (external link) First cuts (external link) by Gene (external link), on Flickr

The texture is firmer than I had hoped for but it was nice and tender...and the flavor is great. It's very possible that my internal temp probe was giving me false readings because it probably could have cooked longer. Lessons learned!

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/GHj2​w5  (external link) Plated (external link) by Gene (external link), on Flickr

Here's a breakdown of my first brisket smokeout...

5:30 - place the brisket on the grill - grill temp varied between 200° & 250°

9:30 - wrap in aluminum foil (2 layers) - stalled at 154°

12:30 - remove from grill - achieved 203° - place in cooler to rest, kept foil on

1:00 - remove from wrap - carve against the grain

1:15 - Give'er the 'ol taste test - conclusion: not too shabby for my first attempt.


Total time: 7.75 hours

almost 8 hours! wow, but looks good.
I wouldn't have a patience for that.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nekrosoft13
Goldmember
Avatar
4,087 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 683
Joined Jun 2010
     
May 14, 2016 09:29 |  #17553
bannedPermanent ban

wallstreetoneil wrote in post #18006696 (external link)
FYI

Purchased the Sigma Adapter MC-11 yesterday
- downloaded and installed a software upgrade that just came out for the MC-11
- it is much improved
- Sigma 24-105 now can AF-C
- tried it quickly with the Canon 24-70 F2.8 II, 17-40 F4, 35L II, 85L II - all work well
- 70-200 F2.8 works just as well as the Metabones (which is basically 95% until you are really at 200mm and then you can have some hunting - but most of the time it is good)
- Eye AF works with the Sigma 24-105


I hadn't heard about this upgrade but saw it posted on FM - easy download - just plug in adapter and quickly updates itself

I returned my MC-11 few days ago, it was beyond crappy in original state... so what does this software update fix/add?


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallstreetoneil
Goldmember
Avatar
2,086 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 1219
Joined Nov 2014
Location: Toronto Canada
     
May 14, 2016 09:33 as a reply to  @ nekrosoft13's post |  #17554

I just got it 2 days ago to try it with the Sigma 24-105 - seems to work as well as the Metabones on the Canon lenses. The Sigma doesn't seem as snappy as the Canon 24-70 but everything does work. Going to try it out next few days - but continuous AF-C works on the Sigma. May go into the store and try a few Sigma lenses


Hockey and wedding photographer. Favourite camera / lens combos: a 1DX II with a Tamron 45 1.8 VC, an A7Rii with a Canon 24-70F2.8L II, and a 5DSR with a Tamron 85 1.8 VC. Every lens I own I strongly recommend [Canon (35Lii, 100L Macro, 24-70F2.8ii, 70-200F2.8ii, 100-400Lii), Tamron (45 1.8, 85 1.8), Sigma 24-105]. If there are better lenses out there let me know because I haven't found them.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nekrosoft13
Goldmember
Avatar
4,087 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 683
Joined Jun 2010
     
May 14, 2016 09:38 |  #17555
bannedPermanent ban

wallstreetoneil wrote in post #18006750 (external link)
I just got it 2 days ago to try it with the Sigma 24-105 - seems to work as well as the Metabones on the Canon lenses. The Sigma doesn't seem as snappy as the Canon 24-70 but everything does work. Going to try it out next few days - but continuous AF-C works on the Sigma. May go into the store and try a few Sigma lenses

Here is the update info:

It has improved the following phenomenon that occurs when lenses that are not compatible with the MC-11 are attached and no light is emitted on the MC-11’s LED lamp.
● It does not operate properly on continuous shooting mode.
● In the case of some lenses that incorporate an OS function, when the camera’s power is turned off, it does not respond to any operation for a certain period of time.
● When open aperture is not selected for shooting, the aperture does not return to fully open.
※ Improvements may not be visible with some products.
※ The phenomenon that the diaphragm closes when the camera’s power is turned off is due to the characteristic of the camera and is considered to specification.


It was bad with 35 Art and beyond crappy with 150-600 Sport.... Sigma still has a note on their website that 150-600 will be updated in June-August to make it "more compatible" with MC-11.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallstreetoneil
Goldmember
Avatar
2,086 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 1219
Joined Nov 2014
Location: Toronto Canada
     
May 14, 2016 10:21 |  #17556

nekrosoft13 wrote in post #18006756 (external link)
Here is the update info:

It was bad with 35 Art and beyond crappy with 150-600 Sport.... Sigma still has a note on their website that 150-600 will be updated in June-August to make it "more compatible" with MC-11.

I think it is unreasonable to expect any long lens to work - the camera battery doesn't have the juice to drive those lenses. From a pure Canon compatible perspective - it seems fine. Also seems like a good signal that there is an update such that there is likely to be more coming if they think it will sell them more lenses.


Hockey and wedding photographer. Favourite camera / lens combos: a 1DX II with a Tamron 45 1.8 VC, an A7Rii with a Canon 24-70F2.8L II, and a 5DSR with a Tamron 85 1.8 VC. Every lens I own I strongly recommend [Canon (35Lii, 100L Macro, 24-70F2.8ii, 70-200F2.8ii, 100-400Lii), Tamron (45 1.8, 85 1.8), Sigma 24-105]. If there are better lenses out there let me know because I haven't found them.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eriet30
Goldmember
Avatar
3,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4182
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Phoenix AZ
     
May 14, 2016 10:38 |  #17557

So is anyone else antsy for medicine to get back from Iceland and see his pics!


"Vision is the art of seeing that which is invisible"
http:// … flickr (external link) www.paulvanderveen.net (external link)

A1 / A7R4 -CV10, FE14GM, CV21 3.5, FE35GM, Sig 24-70 art FE85G, FE 70-200v2GM, FE 200-600 G, Rok 8mm Fish, Sony 1.4x
FOR SALE: FE85G

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nekrosoft13
Goldmember
Avatar
4,087 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 683
Joined Jun 2010
     
May 14, 2016 11:20 |  #17558
bannedPermanent ban

wallstreetoneil wrote in post #18006795 (external link)
I think it is unreasonable to expect any long lens to work - the camera battery doesn't have the juice to drive those lenses. From a pure Canon compatible perspective - it seems fine. Also seems like a good signal that there is an update such that there is likely to be more coming if they think it will sell them more lenses.

150-600 works fine with metabones, but MC-11 was horrible.... so it can be done to some extent...


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vinmunoz
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
17,438 posts
Gallery: 444 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 10277
Joined Sep 2010
Location: California
     
May 14, 2016 11:30 |  #17559

mystik610 wrote in post #18006651 (external link)
I don't think you need to buy ads. It's a relationship business and word of mouth referrals are worth more than ads....so tap into your natural market and the people you've shot for in the past....particularly the models you've shot! One of the things I did last year when I got back into this is made an appeal to facebook about this being a relationship business and asked people to share my page and spread the word about me IF they were genuinely fans of my work. That's harder to do than it sounds, takes some humility and some 'balls' (as you put it) to put yourself out there, but I was surprised by the amount of support I got and it spring boarded me to being booked every weekend up until now when things roll off for the summer.

Also keep posting your own photos online as every thing you post is a marketing piece. Instagram compresses photos to hell but is great for marketing. My wife hash tagged one of my photos of our on her instagram and it made it on disney's instagram account when they reposted it. I've been a believer since.

I used to asked my friends to share my work. None of them fu***ing care. There's one or two sometimes. That's why i wanted to try the fb ads. I guess i just have to hashtags all my postings.


| SONY A7SIII(2) | A73 | A6000 | Sony A7IV | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 | Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 | Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | Sony 16035F4PZ | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro | Canon 24mm TSE | Laowa 15mm Shift
INSTAGRAM (external link)- WEBSITE (external link) - FACEBOOK (external link) - 500PX (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eriet30
Goldmember
Avatar
3,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4182
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Phoenix AZ
     
May 14, 2016 11:47 |  #17560

vinmunoz wrote in post #18006853 (external link)
I used to asked my friends to share my work. None of them fu***ing care. There's one or two sometimes. That's why i wanted to try the fb ads. I guess i just have to hashtags all my postings.


So I was with 2 Olympus Visionaries and http://frankleeruggles​.photoshelter.com/inde​x (external link) this last weekend. They are not portrait guys but in asking them about the business it is all about self promotion via instagram twitter facebook etc. They all told me when you post a pic dont post more than one or two but put a story to the face and it will be recognized and shared much more. I think this all blends over to what you do. And I havent replied earlier but I think your work is great and looking back over time you have really grown as a photog. It wont be an easy transition but I think for you well worth it in the end. Just promote promote promote. You have the talent!


"Vision is the art of seeing that which is invisible"
http:// … flickr (external link) www.paulvanderveen.net (external link)

A1 / A7R4 -CV10, FE14GM, CV21 3.5, FE35GM, Sig 24-70 art FE85G, FE 70-200v2GM, FE 200-600 G, Rok 8mm Fish, Sony 1.4x
FOR SALE: FE85G

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMaG82
Goldmember
Avatar
1,165 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 484
Joined Jun 2008
     
May 14, 2016 12:15 as a reply to  @ eriet30's post |  #17561

Definitely, promote yourself, especially cuz Vin is very talented. Just need to remember that at times there might be a fine line when it comes to promotion. It's society now though, 1-2 pictures is what it seems that people have the patience to go through. Case in point, you put up one really nice photo on social media and I'm sure it'll get a lot of comments/likes. Put up a dozen or more and it's more likely to be ignored.

I know myself personally if I see a friend put up a nice snapshot while they're on vacation or a family portrait I'll take the time to comment or hit like. When someone else puts up 148 pictures of their trip to Orlando, it gets a pass from me.

One thing that might help is to expand your exposure on multiple avenues of social media if you're going that way. Some people are Facebook only, some are solely Instagram. Others are all social media. It might be more work but don't limit yourself to one way of promoting, do them all.


Current Gear: Sony RX1RII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 14, 2016 12:32 |  #17562

Facebook has been ok for photography promotion, might reach a larger crowd with Instagram, and with IG, you can post and share to Facebook, promote both the same time.

I know a kid that promotes with both that way. He'll get a like or two on FB and hundreds on IG. Folks on IG seem to engage much more. His solicitations seem to work better there, but it's the younger crowd for sure.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mystik610
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,076 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 12358
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Houston, TX
     
May 14, 2016 13:46 |  #17563

vinmunoz wrote in post #18006853 (external link)
I used to asked my friends to share my work. None of them fu***ing care. There's one or two sometimes. That's why i wanted to try the fb ads. I guess i just have to hashtags all my postings.

That sucks man. Filipino community? If it is then yeah.... filipino crab mentality.

hash tags on instagram go a long way. I resisted it for a while but very recently jumped on it...especially since they got rid of the stupid square aspect ratio. Since IG is a photo oriented network, you tend to get more love over there.


focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀIV - α7ʀIII
Sigma 14-24 f2.8 ART - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sigma 35 f1.2 ART - Sony 35 1.8 - Sony/Zeiss 55 1.8 - Sony 85GM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mystik610
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,076 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 12358
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Houston, TX
     
May 14, 2016 13:51 |  #17564

Used the 85 GM a bit for my son's first communion.

First shot was for one of his classmates since her mom really liked what I did a couple weeks ago. The lens renders very similarly to the 50L that I used a couple of weeks back.

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7587/26408490483_03b702196f_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/GeCq​ar  (external link) _DSC3521 (external link) by Carlo Alcala (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7063/26918080012_a7c3599031_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/H1Ec​nN  (external link) _DSC3559 (external link) by Carlo Alcala (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7675/26408482933_f2a2d5c660_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/GeCn​Vg  (external link) _DSC3529 (external link) by Carlo Alcala (external link), on Flickr

focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀIV - α7ʀIII
Sigma 14-24 f2.8 ART - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sigma 35 f1.2 ART - Sony 35 1.8 - Sony/Zeiss 55 1.8 - Sony 85GM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mystik610
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,076 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 12358
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Houston, TX
     
May 14, 2016 13:55 |  #17565

Some shots of my lunch since we were talking about BBQ y'day

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7133/26978725856_233dc21b02_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/H722​gN  (external link) _DSC3572 (external link) by Carlo Alcala (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7130/26918172632_a74bbeebb9_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/H1EE​UG  (external link) _DSC3580 (external link) by Carlo Alcala (external link), on Flickr

focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀIV - α7ʀIII
Sigma 14-24 f2.8 ART - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sigma 35 f1.2 ART - Sony 35 1.8 - Sony/Zeiss 55 1.8 - Sony 85GM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,554,528 views & 33,340 likes for this thread, 198 members have posted to it and it is followed by 126 members.
Sony A7x lounge
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2720 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.