You know what happened? The Sigma 20mm happened. I had just got it specifically for my KC trip and it really wowed me. And, of course, the Otus 55mm wows me. By comparison the 35L II shots just don't have the same pop to them.
The 35L II is technically awesome - stunningly sharp and superbly well-corrected, but I'm just not seeing the wow in the images as I would prefer.
I had tried the FE 35mm last year and thought it did produce "wow" images, but my copy was defective and it had to be returned. Definitely will consider trying it again if I decide to sell the 35L II.
Yeah, that's one thing that worries me about the FE35. I keep hearing the old "you have to buy 3 of them, and keep the best one". No way would I ever have the patience or financial resources to do that. But that aside, I've seen some absolutely stunning images come out of that lens. My second problem, of course, is that I'm predominantly a portrait shooter. So 35 isn't my ideal focal length (unless there's a 1 in front of the 35), and it would probably spend most of the time on my shelf. When I had the 35L (version 1), I hardly ever used it. Usually reached for the 24Lii instead, if I was wanting to go wide. (speaking of.... when oh when will Sony or Zeiss come out with a 24mm f/1.4?)



??
