lapino wrote in post #18056172
so you sold the a7r2 for the a6300? how do you find the a6300? been using my a6000 next to my nikon d750 ever since the Sony launched and about 70 percent of my pics are with the Sony so thinking about upgrading.
It wasn't a direct a7rII to a6300 swap (had a few systems in between) but for me I'm happy with the end result. Don't get me wrong the a7rII will put out better files no question about it. More resolution, more room for cropping. Much better low light performance. With the a7rII I wouldn't even worry about 6400, even 8000-10,000 was clean. 12,800 when exposed right would be fine for me. I often set auto ISO to 12,800. With the a6300 my comfortable level is around 4,000 or so. At 6,400 is pretty much my max. Everything IQ related will lean towards the a7rII.
The a6300 wins out for me in terms of speed. Not just higher FPS. I rarely shoot at high frame rates, even if I do it's in super short bursts at high (8fps) not high+ (11fps). Don't do much burst at all because of the camera locking up to flush the buffer. But AF seems faster, AF points are easier to move if I want to move manually. AF seems more accurate to me. Having less shallow DoF is beneficial for me. With the a7rII and the 55 1.8 I would often shoot at 2.8 only because I would miss focus of my kids shooting wide open. Give me all the EyE AF you want but trying to keep a 3yr old still is next to impossible. It works for adults or people who sit still but for my kids wide open was pretty much 50/50. With my a6300 using EyeAF I'm at f/2 or 2.2 and I'm hitting 85-90% of the time.
I prefer the corner EVF especially since I'm a right eye shooter. I no longer have half my face hidden by the screen. I'm don't have my daughter asking where I am and I can survey the scene with my left eye.
It's about 30-40% lighter than the a7rII. The a7 series isn't a heavy camera by any means, my latest K-1 was over 1,000 grams. But it's lighter but not any less dense than the a7 series.
For me personally if faced with buying new I'd rather put the 1,000 towards the a6300 and the rest towards lenses than $3,200 for the a7rII but again I don't shoot for pay, this isn't my livelihood. You can get the a6300 and say 3-5 lenses for H amount you pretty much pay for the a7rII and 1 lens. You can't go wrong either way really. I don't see myself going back. Sure I miss the FF look a lot, sure I miss the 35 being a 35. But for 4 lenses that is have now I'm good for 95% of my shooting. I'll take an a7000 with IBIS, a return of the tri-navi (still my all time favorite camera), touch screen, AF joystick and dual card slots at say $1,700 over an a9 at $4,500.