Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Digital Cameras 
Thread started 27 May 2015 (Wednesday) 18:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sony A7x lounge

 
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4608
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Sep 08, 2016 04:59 |  #23641

davidfarina wrote in post #18120727 (external link)
They indeed did. but its not possible to test a nikon lens on a canon body or a E mount lens on a nikon body. With advanced sensor technology and more precise the A7RII every lens can now be tested on the same sensor.

Thats why nikon lenses generally had better scores prior to the 5DS announcement as nikon had 36mpx offerings while canons had 24mpx at most.

Im just wondering why it took them soo long to start testing on an A7R2

Yep. I can tell you that all of my Canon glass got a lot sharper when I got the A7RII. :) Even my 24-70L (1st gen) has been impressing me with the increased level of detail.


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mystik610
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,076 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 12358
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Houston, TX
     
Sep 08, 2016 05:58 |  #23642

davidfarina wrote in post #18120727 (external link)
They indeed did. but its not possible to test a nikon lens on a canon body or a E mount lens on a nikon body. With advanced sensor technology and more precise the A7RII every lens can now be tested on the same sensor.

Thats why nikon lenses generally had better scores prior to the 5DS announcement as nikon had 36mpx offerings while canons had 24mpx at most.

Im just wondering why it took them soo long to start testing on an A7R2

Yeah I know...the DXO data is actually really useful...but every so often they make ridiculous statements like "the 85 has Otus like performance", and the whole statement is invalidated because you then see they tested one lens on a 42mp sensor, and the other on a 36mp sensor. When you throw the Otus mounted on the 5DSR into the mix, the story changes, but it's not so click-baity to present the data that way lol.

It's all pretty irrelevant at the end of the day....all of these modern high priced lenses are so sharp that you'd be hard pressed to notice the difference in real world shooting. The thing that stands out most to me when comparing lenses is rendering, and that's something these measurements and even very thorough comparison images fail to capture every time.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/09/2/LQ_812342.jpg
Image hosted by forum (812342) © mystik610 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀIV - α7ʀIII
Sigma 14-24 f2.8 ART - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sigma 35 f1.2 ART - Sony 35 1.8 - Sony/Zeiss 55 1.8 - Sony 85GM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
Post edited over 7 years ago by BrandonSi.
     
Sep 08, 2016 06:10 |  #23643

nekrosoft13 wrote in post #18120490 (external link)
is there any other differences? is the older TT585 fully TTL compatible?

No idea.. I know the 685S does HSS, has the built in transceiver, and does TTL.. so that's all I needed. :)

http://flashhavoc.com …-ttl-speedlight-released/ (external link)


[ www (external link)· flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mystik610
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,076 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 12358
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Houston, TX
     
Sep 08, 2016 06:11 |  #23644

Off-topic (maybe not since Apple uses Sony sensors). I'm going to order the new iPhone for my wife at midnight tonight. Not going to lie...I'm excited to play with the new dual camera they put into it....particularly the DOF effect. I had an HTC one at one point that used a dual camera to produce composite image with one camera defocused and the other in focus, but the execution wasn't so great. I personally use android devices, but Apple's execution tends to be more refined, so maybe they've done a better job with this.


focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀIV - α7ʀIII
Sigma 14-24 f2.8 ART - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sigma 35 f1.2 ART - Sony 35 1.8 - Sony/Zeiss 55 1.8 - Sony 85GM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eddie
xpfloyd lookalike
Avatar
14,835 posts
Gallery: 719 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 10956
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Post edited over 7 years ago by Eddie. (2 edits in all)
     
Sep 08, 2016 06:29 |  #23645

mystik610 wrote in post #18120777 (external link)
Off-topic (maybe not since Apple uses Sony sensors). I'm going to order the new iPhone for my wife at midnight tonight. Not going to lie...I'm excited to play with the new dual camera they put into it....particularly the DOF effect. I had an HTC one at one point that used a dual camera to produce composite image with one camera defocused and the other in focus, but the execution wasn't so great. I personally use android devices, but Apple's execution tends to be more refined, so maybe they've done a better job with this.

my first iPhone was the 3G and I was then using samsungs from that point on. In the las few months my work phone got upgraded from a Samsung to an iPhone 5S. It was confusing for the first day but now that I'm used to it I love it! I couldn't see myself going back to Samsung now. I'm also not bothered that there's newer models as this one is still good. The cameras produce decent images too. That's the only reason I would be interested in a newer model as I know the cameras keep getting even better. I follow a few guys on Instagram that only shoot with an iphone and honestly the stuff they produce is amazing


Leica M11 | Leica Q2 | Sony α7RV
Voigtlander 28 f/2 Ulton II | Leica 50 Summilux ASPH
16-35GM | 24GM | 35GM | 85GM | Tamron 35-150 | Sigma 105 Macro Art

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alfredomora
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,976 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19680
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Denver
     
Sep 08, 2016 06:49 |  #23646

I am also excited about the dual camera on the new iPhone. I have the 6 plus and like the camera in it. I use it a lot for videos of my son.


- Alfredo -
Sony a7RII | Voightlander 12 f5.6 | Sony 16-35 GM f2.8 | Zeiss Batis 18 f2.8 | Zeiss Loxia 21 f2.8 | FE 55 f1.8 | Zeiss Loxia 85 f2.4 | Sony 100-400 GM |
Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MedicineMan4040
The Magic Johnson of Cameras
Avatar
22,570 posts
Gallery: 1956 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 79450
Joined Jul 2013
     
Sep 08, 2016 07:37 |  #23647

Tit of the morning.

IMAGE: https://c3.staticflickr.com/9/8392/29506598186_7594599a9b_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/LXp2​Du  (external link) Tit of the morning (external link) by MedicineMan4040 (external link), on Flickr

flickr (external link)
Vid Collection: https://www.youtube.co​m/user/medicineman4040 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,971 posts
Gallery: 236 photos
Likes: 17609
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
Post edited over 7 years ago by navydoc. (4 edits in all)
     
Sep 08, 2016 08:15 |  #23648

Here's a new edit on an older image. I wanted to remove the sign and other distractions from this version. The banding in the sky is due to the gif compression. It isn't there in the jpg shot.

So, here's the before/after and a link to the larger 5683 x 3197 after shot.

https://c2.staticflick​r.com …07489090_1dd494​7ef0_o.jpg (external link)

IMAGE: http://www.ussoriskany.us/caddy/Caddy.gif

Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
invi2003
Goldmember
Avatar
1,253 posts
Gallery: 437 photos
Likes: 2089
Joined Mar 2007
Location: New York
     
Sep 08, 2016 08:19 |  #23649

That's me. a7ii + sel50f14z

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/09/2/LQ_812359.jpg
Image hosted by forum (812359) © invi2003 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TRhoads
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,867 posts
Gallery: 740 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 20654
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Roswell, Georgia
     
Sep 08, 2016 08:21 |  #23650

Gene, don't forget to add some focus fall off in the foreground too...its really hard to replicate shallow DoF...every time I have tried, I am never happy with the outcome.


Website (external link) | YouTube (external link) | Instagram (external link) | The Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,971 posts
Gallery: 236 photos
Likes: 17609
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
     
Sep 08, 2016 08:26 |  #23651

TRhoads wrote in post #18120884 (external link)
Gene, don't forget to add some focus fall off in the foreground too...its really hard to replicate shallow DoF...every time I have tried, I am never happy with the outcome.

Thanks Travis. Originally I had some foreground falloff but removed it. Here is what it looks like with the foreground going out of focus.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/09/2/LQ_812360.jpg
Image hosted by forum (812360) © navydoc [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
invi2003
Goldmember
Avatar
1,253 posts
Gallery: 437 photos
Likes: 2089
Joined Mar 2007
Location: New York
     
Sep 08, 2016 08:32 |  #23652

navydoc wrote in post #18120890 (external link)
Thanks Travis. Originally I had some foreground falloff but removed it. Here is what it looks like with the foreground going out of focus.

Hosted photo: posted by navydoc in
./showthread.php?p=181​20890&i=i236053421
forum: Sony Digital Cameras

I like this edit.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TRhoads
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,867 posts
Gallery: 740 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 20654
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Roswell, Georgia
     
Sep 08, 2016 08:35 |  #23653

it is a bit too abrupt...when I have tried to do that, I use a radial blur mask to avoid the harsh line across the bottom. Like I said...I find it a real PITA to replicate shallow DoF...


Website (external link) | YouTube (external link) | Instagram (external link) | The Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Sep 08, 2016 08:51 |  #23654

mystik610 wrote in post #18120777 (external link)
Off-topic (maybe not since Apple uses Sony sensors). I'm going to order the new iPhone for my wife at midnight tonight. Not going to lie...I'm excited to play with the new dual camera they put into it....particularly the DOF effect. I had an HTC one at one point that used a dual camera to produce composite image with one camera defocused and the other in focus, but the execution wasn't so great. I personally use android devices, but Apple's execution tends to be more refined, so maybe they've done a better job with this.

xpfloyd wrote in post #18120785 (external link)
my first iPhone was the 3G and I was then using samsungs from that point on. In the las few months my work phone got upgraded from a Samsung to an iPhone 5S. It was confusing for the first day but now that I'm used to it I love it! I couldn't see myself going back to Samsung now. I'm also not bothered that there's newer models as this one is still good. The cameras produce decent images too. That's the only reason I would be interested in a newer model as I know the cameras keep getting even better. I follow a few guys on Instagram that only shoot with an iphone and honestly the stuff they produce is amazing

may not seem like a huge thing but anyone use family sharing?

well my school requires that kids use an ipad, and so I have to buy apps for the kids to use. With family sharing, they can all share the same purchase. It's pretty darn nifty in practice and a good way to lock a whole family into one camp whether apple or android. My wife is using the iphone 5, and she's due for an upgrade, didnt know you could preorder, so will be checking that out.

My kids are pretty much a lock with apple, they already have their icloud accounts for school, however for me, I'll give up my nexus 6p as soon as apple makes a decent fingerprint reader, it's just so useful to have an ultra fast and reliable fingerprint reader, I cant even believe it's this good (try using any iphone/ipad finger reader for a period of time, it totally sucks in comparison). I hate putting in a passcode and at the same time need that feature to keep my phone secure, I keep dropbox on my phone, which has high security stuff I rely on. The usb 3C charging is amazing as well, so fast.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lapino
Senior Member
Avatar
528 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 157
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Oudenaarde, Belgium
Post edited over 7 years ago by lapino. (2 edits in all)
     
Sep 08, 2016 09:30 |  #23655

Ozzy enjoying an afternoon sun

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/09/2/LQ_812376.jpg
Image hosted by forum (812376) © lapino [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/09/2/LQ_812378.jpg
Image hosted by forum (812378) © lapino [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/23660915@N07/ (external link)
Gear:
Fuji X-T3 / 18-55 / 23-1.4 / 35-2 / 55-200 / RX100M4
Sony A7III / Tamron 28-75 / 55-1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,552,037 views & 33,340 likes for this thread, 198 members have posted to it and it is followed by 126 members.
Sony A7x lounge
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2470 guests, 98 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.