mystik610 wrote in post #17711272
I haven't. But with regards to the FE, based on the size, price, and reviews of the lens, I'd lean more towards the Canon version now that it AF's with the a7rII well. I like the stuff you've taken with this combo.
Yeah. I think I'm going to keep the Canon EF 16-35/4 IS myself. It's a better value than the FE version, and I suspect it's optically a bit better.
I'm willing to compromise on size (it's not really that big of a deal, for me). I also already have the 77mm filters covered.
In fact, invested in a bunch of step up rings so I can use my 77m filters on the 24-70 (67mm) and a number of other lenses.
Charlie wrote in post #17711281
this thread moves at an insane pace, so I'll just have to skip what I missed and start here. The 16-35F4 is fairly large compared to the FE 16-35. I would emphasize more on filter size at that point.
if I ever shot a 16-35, I'de be looking at filter sizes first, if size is not an issue, go with the canon. A known good lens and inexpensive.
Some good stuff in the past few days. Where you been? 
Also in light of the fires up north, i ended up scrapping my plans for the Yosemite road trip and booked us a trip to Vancouver next week. We'll be spending 4 days in and around Vancouver. So now I have to revise my kit for that trip (air travel, vs. road trip).
Anyone here have any suggestions of good spots to hit up in VAN? (Photographic, Culinary or otherwise). I've never been.
Sony A7RII and a bunch of lenses.