They go to sleep when not in use.
Not if you're a fileserver in a data center or enterprise environment - no time to sleep.
chantu Senior Member 907 posts Likes: 26 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Bay Area More info | Jun 12, 2015 18:25 | #16 Archibald wrote in post #17594746 They go to sleep when not in use. Not if you're a fileserver in a data center or enterprise environment - no time to sleep.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wicktron Member 32 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2011 More info | Jun 12, 2015 18:26 | #17 chantu wrote in post #17594753 Not if you're a fileserver in a data center or enterprise environment - no time to sleep. That's why those drives usually have higher MTBF and are in RAID arrays
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ReservoirDog A Band Apart More info | Jun 12, 2015 20:02 | #18 Archibald wrote in post #17594746 They go to sleep when not in use. Yep ! Patrice
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ReservoirDog A Band Apart More info | Jun 12, 2015 20:05 | #19 chantu wrote in post #17594753 Not if you're a fileserver in a data center or enterprise environment - no time to sleep. I do not think that the TS is in this case ... at all Patrice
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chantu Senior Member 907 posts Likes: 26 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Bay Area More info | What's a TS?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Jun 13, 2015 09:51 | #21 chantu wrote in post #17594720 Enterprise drives carry longer warranty's; hence the higher costs to guarantee the longer MTBF. If Backblaze wants to cut corners to save a few dollars, so be it. I'm not sure if one would want to keep mission-critical data on a disk drive screaming along 24/7. That being said, the enterprise HD could fail tomorrow, and the consumer-grade could last for years on end. It's your data to "roll the dice" ![]() Backblaze had a statement on the topic of enterprise vs. consumer drives, which ZDNet included in an article in Sept 2014 You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ReservoirDog A Band Apart More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Reservoir Dog. | Jun 14, 2015 00:22 | #22 chantu wrote in post #17595065 What's a TS? Thread Starter as it's written in red under it's nickname here >> https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?p=17584886 Patrice
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Archibald You must be quackers! More info | Jun 14, 2015 00:55 | #23 Reservoir Dog wrote in post #17596125 Thread Starter as it's written in red under its nickname here >> https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?p=17584886 ![]() Very clever, but it is clearer when acronyms are avoided. Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ReservoirDog A Band Apart More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Reservoir Dog. (2 edits in all) | Jun 14, 2015 01:21 | #24 I agree, as a matter of fact, i started to use many acronyms on this forum (bad influence) Patrice
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 12, 2015 02:02 | #25 Thank you for all the great responses.....having computer issues so it's taken me this long to get back here!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gomar Senior Member 549 posts Likes: 32 Joined Sep 2010 Location: NYC More info | Aug 19, 2015 21:28 | #26 I have a 500gb Toshiba portable, works fine after 2 years. I am getting a 3TB for $120 now.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chantu Senior Member 907 posts Likes: 26 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Bay Area More info Post edited over 8 years ago by chantu. | Aug 20, 2015 13:24 | #27 Wilt wrote in post #17582398 Many times, the so-called 'external hard drives' which you buy with Western Digital, Seagate, etc. name brands on them actually contain inferior support electronics (the USB interface itself or the power supply fails) yet the actually storage unit is perfectly fine! In such cases, if you break into the enclosure and extract the harddrive, you can put the harddrive into a 'USB docking station' like these... http://www.amazon.com …fRID=0268QKMNE58C8X1X1TPA http://www.amazon.com …ds=harddrive+dock+station ...and get access to all the data stored in the supposedly bad external hard drive. Just because it has a recognized quality harddrive within the enclosure is no guarantee that the same manufacturer puts quality electronics into the external enclosure, which serves only the purpose of increasing their harddrive sales volume for them! I had to use a hacksaw to sufficiently break open a WD enclosure which had failed, and inserting the WD harddrive into a USB docking unit got me access to all the data. Such docking stations are also usable in place of the permanent external enclosures associated with most 'external hard drive'. So you could insert Harddrive X to make a Windows 7 system image, insert Harddrive Y whenenever you do postprocessing on photo files, insert Harddrive Z when you wish to duplicate important files for data insurance, using one docking unit.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info Post edited over 8 years ago by CyberDyneSystems. (3 edits in all) | Aug 20, 2015 17:15 | #28 - I love the docking hard drive stations, been using one or more for some time. My first one was E-Sata, but USB 3 is pretty fast! - I've never in all my time on this forum read the acronym "TS" unless it was being applied to TeamSpeed. - We've been using Original Poster since 2003 or earlier. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hard drives are generally the first things to fail, for many of the reasons you mentioned. They are one of very few mechanical parts inside of a PC. Moving parts generally fail first. The problem with a lot of portable drives is not simple circuits themselves failing, but wiring/connections becoming loose from frequent plugging/unplugging of USB (and potentially power) cords. While not mechanical per se, the forces we exert on external drives leads to failure. I've been in the same boat multiple times with external drives failing because of connectors primarily.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Wilt. | Aug 29, 2015 23:43 | #30 chantu wrote in post #17676563 Hmm, after reading this I'm not sure I agree. While I don't doubt this could have happened, the post suggests that the external USB electronics is LESS reliable that the actual HD itself. The USB electronics is just a few off-the-shelf components whereas the HD has some very complex DSP electronics to eek out every last bit on the disk platter, plus the disk drive itself is screaming along at 5400 or more RPM and the drive head whizzing along like a turntable on steroids. From this perspective, I would think the HD fails before the USB electronics. That being said I not saying NOT to get an external HD enclosure; it just probably is not giving you anymore reliability than getting the all-in-one drive. If you carefully re-read my post, which you replied to, that is EXACTLY what I was saying...that the USB support electronics within the external case has failed, yet the harddrive contained within that same external case is just fine! You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1210 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||