Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 10 Jun 2015 (Wednesday) 11:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

lightroom processing diff colors. windowns photo viewer and windows photos show different

 
Astheros
Member
Avatar
181 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 42
Joined Dec 2008
Location: USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by Astheros.
     
Jun 10, 2015 11:20 |  #1

hello there everyone,
i have been complaining to my wife for a couple weeks now that the photos i edit look one way in lightroom but when exported they change appearance. the colors usually get intensified and oversaturated plus edges get more jagged. i thought this was a lightroom export settings problems but today i opened an image in "photos" as opposed to "windows photo viewer" and in "PHOTOS" the image looked exactly like the lightroom version but the windows photo viewer imaged look all choppy and oversaturated. is this something i need to worry about or is it something more along the lines of 'just set PHOTOS as the default image viewing program from now on'

how will people see the pics on their screens?
i have attached screenshots so you better understand what i am saying. thanks for any and all feedback.

this is how image looks in lightroom edited

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/462/18057718613_85a35c0bfb_c.jpg


this are the export settings i use most often.
IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/404/18490634508_027e5a23bf_c.jpg


this is how the exported image looks in WINDOWS PHOTO VIEWER (darker, jagged, oversaturated)
IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/377/18490634368_c252bec6c3_c.jpg


this is how the exported image looks in PHOTOS (program in windows 8.1) looks much more like the lightroom shot (soft, creamy, cinematic)
IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/550/18490807878_d1e593a7fe_b.jpg


so my question is: is this something i have to deal with and fix, or this more of like 'i have been using the wrong program to view my pictures and i should use PHOTOS from now on"
thanks

Canon 6D *** Canon 24-70L f/2.8 II*** Canon 135mm f2 *** Canon 70-200 f4L IS
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,597 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1542
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Jun 10, 2015 12:41 |  #2

There's a Color Management sticky thread:

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=296149

kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
isvein
Member
Avatar
137 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Likes: 154
Joined Dec 2014
Location: Norway Moss
     
Jun 10, 2015 12:46 |  #3

LR does colormanagment, windows does not.
I wonder when MS shall do as Apple does, because OS X is colour managed all over.


Olympus OM1-2, OLM 12-40 F2.8 pro, OLM 40.150 F2.8 pro, OLM 60mm macro 2.8, OLM 45mm 1.2 pro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jun 10, 2015 13:12 |  #4

Make sure to export from Lightroom in the sRGB color space, unless you have a very good reason to do otherwise.

Windows Picture Viewer is widely regarded to be crap.


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Astheros
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
181 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 42
Joined Dec 2008
Location: USA
     
Jun 10, 2015 13:16 |  #5

isvein wrote in post #17591629 (external link)
LR does colormanagment, windows does not.
I wonder when MS shall do as Apple does, because OS X is colour managed all over.

so maybe i need to get a Mac?

nathancarter wrote in post #17591656 (external link)
Make sure to export from Lightroom in the sRGB color space, unless you have a very good reason to do otherwise.

Windows Picture Viewer is widely regarded to be crap.

i do export in sRGB. any other image viewing software you recommend. i am using PHOTOS now but it like a slideshow type of thing and it cumbersome.


Canon 6D *** Canon 24-70L f/2.8 II*** Canon 135mm f2 *** Canon 70-200 f4L IS
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NullMember
Goldmember
3,019 posts
Likes: 1130
Joined Nov 2009
     
Jun 10, 2015 14:30 |  #6
bannedPermanently

Astheros wrote in post #17591659 (external link)
...any other image viewing software you recommend...

You could always use Lightroom, it does have a built in slideshow.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
isvein
Member
Avatar
137 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Likes: 154
Joined Dec 2014
Location: Norway Moss
     
Jun 10, 2015 14:50 |  #7

Astheros wrote in post #17591659 (external link)
so maybe i need to get a Mac?

i do export in sRGB. any other image viewing software you recommend. i am using PHOTOS now but it like a slideshow type of thing and it cumbersome.

No, that would be the expensive way, but do you calibrate your monitors?
It helps a lot, to show sRGB right.
I use the X-Rite i1 and likes that one a lot and has had no big problems with colors not showing right, on Windows and OSX.


Olympus OM1-2, OLM 12-40 F2.8 pro, OLM 40.150 F2.8 pro, OLM 60mm macro 2.8, OLM 45mm 1.2 pro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Jun 10, 2015 15:00 |  #8

Do you by any chance have a wide gamut monitor? Because Windows Picture Viewer is not color managed and if an sRGB image is displayed on a wide gamut monitor in a not-color-managed viewer, it will be as you have described - over-saturated and overly contrasty.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Post edited over 8 years ago by tim.
     
Jun 10, 2015 15:02 |  #9

You don't need a mac, you need to learn about color management and use appropriate software. Check my recommended books thread for a color book. I'd link to the book directly but it's in a forum I've hidden and I can't be bothered unhiding it.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Astheros
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
181 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 42
Joined Dec 2008
Location: USA
     
Jun 10, 2015 15:19 |  #10

isvein wrote in post #17591768 (external link)
No, that would be the expensive way, but do you calibrate your monitors?
It helps a lot, to show sRGB right.
I use the X-Rite i1 and likes that one a lot and has had no big problems with colors not showing right, on Windows and OSX.

i will attempt to calibrate it but if the monitor was the problem wouldnt it look bad everywhere. not just on certain software programs?

tzalman wrote in post #17591786 (external link)
Do you by any chance have a wide gamut monitor? Because Windows Picture Viewer is not color managed and if an sRGB image is displayed on a wide gamut monitor in a not-color-managed viewer, it will be as you have described - over-saturated and overly contrasty.

i will look into this. its an acer LED monitor. i will find out.

tim wrote in post #17591792 (external link)
You don't need a mac, you need to learn about color management and use appropriate software. Check my recommended books thread for a color book. I'd link to the book directly but it's in a forum I've hidden and I can't be bothered unhiding it.

yes i def need to learn about color management. this is just a hobby for me but it seems it may turn into a part time thing and i want to do things right for my customers.


Canon 6D *** Canon 24-70L f/2.8 II*** Canon 135mm f2 *** Canon 70-200 f4L IS
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,422 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4513
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 8 years ago by Wilt. (3 edits in all)
     
Jun 12, 2015 16:48 |  #11

Astheros wrote in post #17591817 (external link)
i will attempt to calibrate it but if the monitor was the problem wouldnt it look bad everywhere. not just on certain software programs? i will look into this. its an acer LED monitor. i will find out.


Think about it...The purpose of monitor calibration is to


  1. make the monitor's color/hue renditions appear similar to reality, and
  2. make the monitor's color/hue renditions appear similar to a calibrated printer's output -- and hopefully it mimics reality!

It does NOT address the issue that the photos you edit look one way in Lightroom, but when exported they change appearance when viewed on another program! There are A) those programs that do both #1 and #2, there are B) those programs that do NEITHER #1 nor #2. And it is not going to be that progam #1 looks like program #2 all the time.

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,479 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
lightroom processing diff colors. windowns photo viewer and windows photos show different
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1325 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.