Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Official Stuff The Lounge 
Thread started 11 Jun 2015 (Thursday) 11:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

My employer takes draconian measures against posting photos online

 
Perfectly ­ Frank
I'm too sexy for my lens
3,661 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Likes: 1111
Joined Oct 2010
     
Jun 11, 2015 11:17 |  #1

I think you might find this interesting...

I work for a very large transportation company. We recently got a memo from upper management concerning photography. In a nutshell...

Employees are no longer allowed to post to social media photos or videos of company property - including vehicles, buildings, or other employees.
Even if the photography is done when the employee is off the clock, or the images put the company in a positive light, it is still not allowed.

Employees are not allowed to post to the internet videos or photos of buses or trains that are being used throughout the city.

If an employee is caught using a smartphone to photograph or video company property or vehicles, their smartphone will be confiscated.
Their reason? The image captured is "data" that belongs to the company.

Any employee in violation of these rules may be terminated.

Sounds pretty draconian to me.


My flickr albums (external link)
My Best Aviation Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
sagray
Senior Member
Avatar
309 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 18
Joined May 2008
     
Jun 11, 2015 11:25 |  #2

Sounds like an opportunity for a fun legal challenge.


40D, 5D (Classic)
Sigma 17-35 EX, Canon Nifty Fifty, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L (non-IS), Canon 24-105 f/4L, Canon 135mm f/2L
2 AB400s, 1 Einstein, 2 Canon 580EXIIs, Canon 430EX, Vivitar 285HV, old Quantaray POS
flickr (external link) | Gray Imagery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perfectly ­ Frank
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm too sexy for my lens
3,661 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Likes: 1111
Joined Oct 2010
     
Jun 11, 2015 11:27 |  #3

sagray wrote in post #17592921 (external link)
Sounds like an opportunity for a fun legal challenge.

I was thinking the same. But the cost to me would be too high.


My flickr albums (external link)
My Best Aviation Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
According to the lazy TF, My flatulence rates
Avatar
54,085 posts
Likes: 1593
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jun 11, 2015 11:32 |  #4

I could see that if you are on the clock and the pictures taken on company property but once out in public, your employer looses all right of controlling what you can and cannot post.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,423 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 942
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Jun 11, 2015 11:43 |  #5

Such measures are an amazing way to get your company pasquinaded all over the social-media-sphere.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Windsun33
Member
138 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Phoenix AZ
     
Jun 11, 2015 11:54 |  #6

So what do they plan on doing about non-employees taking pictures? Not to mention that in most locales anything in public view is legal to photograph, with only a few exceptions in some cases.


Canon EOS 6D EOS 70D | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM | Canon Macro Twin Lite MT-24EX Speedlite 600EX-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Moderator
Avatar
75,299 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2130
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jun 11, 2015 12:13 |  #7

sagray wrote in post #17592921 (external link)
Sounds like an opportunity for a fun legal challenge.

Maybe the ACLU?

Perfectly Frank wrote in post #17592927 (external link)
I was thinking the same. But the cost to me would be too high.

I don't blame you. It's time to keep your head down while this plays out.

Perfectly Frank wrote in post #17592907 (external link)
If an employee is caught using a smartphone to photograph or video company property or vehicles, their smartphone will be confiscated.
Their reason? The image captured is "data" that belongs to the company.

Hopefully, someone on their legal team will get fired over this one! ; D


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ptcanon3ti
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,652 posts
Gallery: 320 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 3406
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Gloucester Co. NJ
     
Jun 11, 2015 12:15 |  #8

sagray wrote in post #17592921 (external link)
Sounds like an opportunity for a fun legal challenge.

Based on what?

gjl711 wrote in post #17592939 (external link)
I could see that if you are on the clock and the pictures taken on company property but once out in public, your employer looses all right of controlling what you can and cannot post.


haha...not in my profession - teacher.


Paul
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/petshots/ (external link)
Body - Nikon D750
Lenses - Nikon 20 f1.8 / Nikon 16-35 f4 / Sigma 105 OS Macro / Sigma 24-105 f4 Art / Tamron 70-200 2.8 Di VC / Sigma 150-600 "S"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John
Goldmember
Avatar
1,399 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Oct 2006
     
Jun 11, 2015 13:30 |  #9

I understand the concern if law enforcement prevented us from taking photos on public property or something like that but when it comes to private property, I don't see it as big of an issue.

I used to work for an investment bank, specifically on the trading floor on the public side. It was against policy for an employee to take photos or videos on trading floor except for a business purpose (in which case you'd need management approval). I didn't see it as a big issue.


john | gear | web hosting deal for POTN members!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
Avatar
5,765 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2706
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Portland, OR
     
Jun 11, 2015 13:33 |  #10

Tell them to pound sand.

They cannot tell you that you what you can or cannot take photos of on your own time as long as it is not of their property taken ON their property.

Do you work for the NSA? lol


Getting better at this - Fuji Xt-2 - Fuji X-Pro2 - 18-55 - 23/35/50 f2 WR - 50-140 - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
idkdc
Goldmember
Avatar
2,837 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Oct 2014
     
Jun 11, 2015 13:37 |  #11

If it's a private/public+clandes​tine firm/company and property, I think they might be well within bounds. NSA, Intel, Samsung, Apple have such rules in place too, so lots of precedents/departments for other companies already. Check out your local laws to verify.


1DXII(2) | 5D4 | D850 | 8-800mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,423 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 942
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Post edited over 3 years ago by Alveric.
     
Jun 11, 2015 13:39 |  #12

Businesses now think they own their employees. Welcome to the new face of slavery.

employers wary of brand damage through social media are delving ever deeper into the personal spheres of their workers, demanding that even low-level employees tailor private communications and off-hours behaviour to uphold the corporate image

...a fast-encroaching corporate culture, in which employers view workers as full-time brand ambassadors, and life for almost all employees could be seen as an endless sequence of career hazards

Source: http://www.macleans.ca …jobs/hes-fired-whos-next/ (external link)

The boss is watching.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
That's my line!
Avatar
8,323 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 1641
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Jun 11, 2015 13:55 |  #13

looks like the white woman who started a fight with a black teen is about to get fired for her part in the mess that went on down in Texas last weekend

http://www.dailykos.co​m …ve-Leave-by-CoreLogic-Inc (external link)

wrong as it may seem, getting fired for something you do while off work is not that unusual.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EnglishBob
Senior Member
Avatar
555 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 114
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Clovis, California.
     
Jun 11, 2015 14:10 |  #14

The company I work for has a very similar policy for social media. Doesn't affect me, no plans to photograph work on my own time.


Gallery (external link) MyGear (external link) About Me (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
40,182 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 2022
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 3 years ago by Wilt. (3 edits in all)
     
Jun 11, 2015 14:18 |  #15

FarmerTed1971 wrote in post #17593073 (external link)
Tell them to pound sand.

They cannot tell you that you what you can or cannot take photos of on your own time as long as it is not of their property taken ON their property.

Do you work for the NSA? lol


No matter who they work for, you can find yourself suddenly among those affected by 'Reduction in workForce, sorry to let you go'. Effectively, you are told 'Go pound sand into finer sand' simply because, and there is little avaiLable recourse when you are one of a few dozen.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

8,206 views & 9 likes for this thread
My employer takes draconian measures against posting photos online
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Official Stuff The Lounge 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is TechOne
796 guests, 402 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.