Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 13 Jun 2015 (Saturday) 08:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Mid-Day Fill Flash. Which Method?

 
RandMan
Senior Member
Avatar
403 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Boston, MA
     
Jun 13, 2015 08:20 |  #1

Hello There,

I have an outdoor portrait session in a few days. The people can only do it at noon, so the sun will be bright and high and the shoot is down by the ocean's edge so I predict there won't be much shade.

I'll be using a speedlite mounted on the camera hot shoe for a little fill flash. Question is should I use the flash straight on with lots of negative FEC dialed in? Or.... I also have a Demb Saucer Flip-It. Option 2 would be to point the flash straight up and have the Demb sharply angled forward so it throws most of the light towards the subject. Which method do you think will yield better results?


Canon eos7D | Canon 50mm 1.4 | Canon 17-55mm 2.8 | Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 | Yongnuo 565ex | Yongnuo yn-468 II | Canon ef28-135mm 3.5/5.6 | Canon ef-s 55-250mm 4.0/5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nixland
Senior Member
537 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 199
Joined Apr 2009
     
Jun 13, 2015 09:11 |  #2

The easiest thing to do is ask one of your family or friends to be a model and experiment with your flash and modifiers you have.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,918 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2264
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
Post edited over 8 years ago by windpig.
     
Jun 13, 2015 09:40 |  #3

What is the shooting environment going to be? Will there be fill from any reflective surroundings?
This was shot with a fairly reflective environment (concrete) using on bare on camera flash. Shot at max flash power from about 20 feet away.

I would use none of the silly plastic thingies, you are only going to loose power.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/06/2/LQ_732476.jpg
Image hosted by forum (732476) © windpig [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jun 13, 2015 10:10 |  #4

The demb doesnt make the light appreciably softer in this circumstance as the light source isnt larger. Go with direct flash. Because the fill is close to the ambient, shadow edges are less problematic, in short hard light is less of an issue.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Jun 13, 2015 10:43 |  #5

third vote for direct flash.

in the example windpig posted, the sun is a bit behind the subject. Hopefully you will be able to do something similar. If the sun is in fact directly over head (happens probably less than you might think at noon) you will have shadows in the eye sockets, under the nose, chin, etc. You're flash probably will not be able to over come that situation so try to see if you can position the subject with their back to the sun.

Or, you can arrange for an assistant to hold a diffuser over the person's head.

i came across this video the other day that might help, although i admit i didn't watch it all. :rolleyes:

https://www.youtube.co​m/watch?v=prC516rC5_4 (external link)


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
     
Jun 13, 2015 12:19 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

Another vote for direct flash with the subject's back toward the sun. In such light, most Canon flashes (all the EX models, I believe) will automatically dial in -1 FEC for you. I don't think I've ever used more (less?) than -1/3 FEC on top of that. The sun makes a great hair light, but will ruin shots if it is shining on their faces. Shoot manual, expose for the faces, let ETTL-II do its thing. Oh, and getting some practice on-scene and in similar light should be very informative.


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shadowdancer
Member
217 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Aust.
     
Jun 13, 2015 16:04 |  #7

While experimenting, try exposing for the ambient and using your flash in ettl and camera set for Av. You will probably need to set your flash to HSS. This will help stop the background blowing out.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeeMack
Senior Member
Avatar
778 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
     
Jun 13, 2015 20:02 |  #8

This was taken shortly after noon with full sun directly behind subject with on camera flash in ETTL and HSS. It could have used about -1/2 FEC.


IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/06/2/LQ_732591.jpg
Image hosted by forum (732591) © GeeMack [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

7D, 50 f1.8, 17-55 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 II, 100-400 f4.5-5.6L, 2x TC III, 580EX II, 430EX, 568EX II, 622C
glmphotos.zenfolio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,453 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4545
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 8 years ago by Wilt. (6 edits in all)
     
Jun 13, 2015 20:56 |  #9

shadowdancer wrote in post #17595749 (external link)
While experimenting, try exposing for the ambient and using your flash in ettl and camera set for Av. You will probably need to set your flash to HSS. This will help stop the background blowing out.

uh-oh, the HSS suggestion. Let us assume Sunny 16 conditions, ISO 200, 'normal' lens FL, FF camera, and analyze we we're working with...


  1. Shutter speed 1/200, f/16 for ambient light
  2. ETTL flash has usual non-HSS GN195 for 50mm FL coverage angle at 1/200 ISO 200
  3. If we go to 1/250 this causes flash to go into HSS and GN drops by -2EV (or more, for some units)...to GN98
  4. If we take the shutter to 1/500 and f/11, we lose an additional EV of flash range in HSS... down to GN69
  5. At GN69, with -1EV flash fill the flash is good out only to 8.6' with lens set to f/11 and FEC = -1EV
  6. If we take the shutter to 1/100 and f/8, we lose an additional EV of flash power in HSS... down to GN49
  7. At GN49, with -1EV flash fill the flash is still good out only to 8.6' with lens set to f/8 and FEC = -1EV

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Post edited over 8 years ago by Left Handed Brisket.
     
Jun 13, 2015 21:07 |  #10

GeeMack wrote in post #17595912 (external link)
This was taken shortly after noon with full sun directly behind subject with on camera flash in ETTL and HSS. It could have used about -1/2 FEC.


Hosted photo: posted by GeeMack in
./showthread.php?p=175​95912&i=i191977571
forum: Flash and Studio Lighting

this close to the subject, some kind of bounce card thingy would be a significant difference in apparent size of the modifier and softened not only the edge of the shadows but the specularity of the highlights.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
craigbeckta
Member
Avatar
191 posts
Likes: 55
Joined Jun 2013
     
Jun 14, 2015 13:41 |  #11

Here are a few different ways to deal with Shooting at high noon.




Hope it helps.

Craig Beckta


"Online Digital Photography Training ( Image Classroom )" (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
Post edited over 8 years ago by dmward. (2 edits in all)
     
Jun 14, 2015 15:02 |  #12

If you want to use the speedlite for fill distance is the major determining factor. Too far away and its won't have the power required for HSS.
I've found that the Canon distance scale on the back of a 580EXII or 600EX-RT is reasonably good estimate for distance. I've also found that its sometimes necessary for minus FEC. My guage for FEC is seeing a shadow from the fill behind the subject on the ground. If I can see the shadow I apply minus FEC.

On the beach your only real hope is to but the sun behind them and then use the flash, or a reflector for fill. The advantage a reflector offers is being a much larger light source.

One additional tool is the develop module in Lightroom or the camera raw entry point for raw into photoshop. The shadow slider is an effective tool for opening shadows. Combined with the highlight slider and exposure slider it offers a lot of processing options.

This is a shot from an event yesterday. As you can see sunlight from behind. The dark skin added to the fill requirement. This was shot with a Fuji XT-1 and processed in Lightroom.
Mainly the highlight, shadow, white and black sliders.

I wouldn't go into a portrait session expecting to fix backlit subjects in Lightroom, the reflector or fill flash option is much more powerful. But Lightroom has come a long way with it processing tools as well.

IMAGE: http://dmwfotos.com/galleries/clients/wccwgahr/photos/XT1B7394.jpg

David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
heathermc72
Member
59 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2014
     
Jun 15, 2015 21:20 |  #13

I see neither of your flashes listed in your gear are capable of high speed sync flash. With that in mind, you are going to have keep your shutter speed at probably 1/200 or below to utilize your flash. You can shoot in manual or an auto mode, just dial your FEC up or down to get the effect you want. I too look for flash shadows to adjust my fill flash.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tcphoto1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,744 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Likes: 1969
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
     
Jun 15, 2015 22:52 |  #14

I would forget the flash and learn to utilize natural light. I'd find some cover and shoot in open shade or if you have to shoot in the sun, turn the subject from the sun and backlight them.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/06/3/LQ_732914.jpg
Image hosted by forum (732914) © tcphoto1 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/06/3/LQ_732915.jpg
Image hosted by forum (732915) © tcphoto1 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

www.tonyclarkphoto.com (external link)
www.tcphoto.org (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,232 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
Mid-Day Fill Flash. Which Method?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1139 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.