Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 15 Jun 2015 (Monday) 20:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Inflating JPEGs

 
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Jun 15, 2015 20:56 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

Is there any way to make the final JPEG files larger in size? Some are coming out 13 MB and smaller, and I need them all to be at least 17MB. I can understand the file being smaller when considerable cropping has been done to the image, but some of these images' crop is minimal.

The original TIFFs are over 100MB. I'm just baffled.

Any ideas, anyone?

TIA


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jun 15, 2015 21:03 |  #2

Why do you need them to be 17mb?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DGStinner
Goldmember
Avatar
1,042 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 198
Joined Jan 2014
Location: Middlesex, New Jersey
     
Jun 15, 2015 21:04 |  #3

I too am curious why they need to be at least a certain file size. Normally, they have to be under a certain size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jun 15, 2015 21:07 |  #4

We see these posts occasionally where someone is trying to meet the criteria for a stock submission, its almost always a misinterpretation.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Jun 15, 2015 21:44 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

gonzogolf wrote in post #17598466 (external link)
We see these posts occasionally where someone is trying to meet the criteria for a stock submission, its almost always a misinterpretation.

Correct. This is the guideline in terms of file size: 'Uncompressed file sizes of more than 17MB. This means you must use a DSLR camera with at least 6 megapixels.'


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jun 15, 2015 21:48 as a reply to  @ Alveric's post |  #6

Often times the detailed submission guides offer alternatives to simple fioe size requirements.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EnglishBob
Senior Member
Avatar
555 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 119
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Clovis, California.
     
Jun 15, 2015 21:49 |  #7

13mb jpg is compressed, the uncompressed size in photoshop is probably in the 40-80mb range.


Gallery (external link) MyGear (external link) About Me (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Jun 15, 2015 22:40 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

OK, let's see if I'm getting it: I've this JPEG file that Windows Explorer reports as 15.5 MB in size. When I open it in PS, the Info Panel reads 'Doc: 48.0M/48.0M'. Is it safe then to assume that the requirements are being met?

This is what the stock agency lists as one of the causes for image rejection: 'The uncompressed file size of the image is under 17MB. The uncompressed file size needs to be 17MB or above. If you have a camera that is capable of producing an uncompressed 8 bit file of over 17MB then leave it that size.'


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jun 15, 2015 22:40 |  #9

If you set the jpeg at the highest Quality setting when saving/exporting, you should more than meet the requirement. You'd likely take a different approach if you were saving it for the Web or, say, sharing with people via email.

You might want to contact the agency as to whether they have a "maximum file size" limit..


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Jun 15, 2015 22:42 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

Tony, I've set PhotoMechanic to export the JPEG @ 100% quality, no scaling, and 300 ppi, in AdobeRGB colour space.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jun 15, 2015 23:46 |  #11

Alveric wrote in post #17598551 (external link)
Tony, I've set PhotoMechanic to export the JPEG @ 100% quality, no scaling, and 300 ppi, in AdobeRGB colour space.

What size (resolution in pixels) are the typical images that fail the 17MB limit?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jun 15, 2015 23:54 |  #12

As an added consideration, the file size can be affected the amount of detail present/lacking in your images. For example, a shot of a clear blue sky will likely produce a smaller file than a shot of busy, leafy leaves and such.

You say that "some" of your image files don't reach 17MB, so the question is "Why not?"...


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jun 15, 2015 23:57 |  #13

Alveric wrote in post #17598543 (external link)
OK, let's see if I'm getting it: I've this JPEG file that Windows Explorer reports as 15.5 MB in size. When I open it in PS, the Info Panel reads 'Doc: 48.0M/48.0M'. Is it safe then to assume that the requirements are being met?

YES. You don;t need to change a thing. You file is nearly 50MB uncompressed. No problem.

This is what the stock agency lists as one of the causes for image rejection: 'The uncompressed file size of the image is under 17MB. The uncompressed file size needs to be 17MB or above. If you have a camera that is capable of producing an uncompressed 8 bit file of over 17MB then leave it that size.'


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Post edited over 8 years ago by Alveric.
     
Jun 16, 2015 00:38 |  #14
bannedPermanent ban

tonylong wrote in post #17598636 (external link)
As an added consideration, the file size can be affected the amount of detail present/lacking in your images. For example, a shot of a clear blue sky will likely produce a smaller file than a shot of busy, leafy leaves and such.

You say that "some" of your image files don't reach 17MB, so the question is "Why not?"...

Yup, size will always vary based on image content. Some of the images that 'don't meet the mark' are of a single bird on a featureless background, for example.

Here's one image that based on my previous understanding I wouldn't send in because it's only 11.1 MB:

http://www.diamantstud​ios.ca …/Examples/DS-_MG_4953.jpg (external link)

But now that CyberDyneSystems confuted my initial assumption I can send such images in. :) Thanks, CyberDyne!


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NinetyEight
"Banned for life"
Avatar
3,207 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Dorset - England
     
Jun 16, 2015 01:19 as a reply to  @ Alveric's post |  #15

Yep, that image is 48.3Mb 'Uncompressed' so send it in!


Kev

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,807 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Inflating JPEGs
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1650 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.