Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support 
Thread started 20 Jun 2015 (Saturday) 04:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Gimbal Head - Image Stabilization or not ? ?

 
h14nha
Goldmember
Avatar
2,095 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 179
Joined Nov 2008
Location: South Wales, UK
     
Jun 20, 2015 04:43 |  #1

Hi

Not sure what to do, using a 100-400 Mk1, usually I'd have it off when shooting on a tripod using a ball head and on when using it off a monopod. The Gimbal seems a bit of in between, not really locked down like a tripod but more steady than a monopod. What's the general consensus ? ?

Thanks,

Ian


Ian
There's no fool like an old skool fool :D
myflickr (external link)
My Gear - 7d, / 16-35mm F4 / 70-200 2.8 II / 100-400 / 300mm 2.8 / 500/4 :D XT-1 Graphite 18/35/56

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
troutfisher
Goldmember
Avatar
1,665 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 33
Joined Apr 2007
Location: West Yorkshire UK
     
Jun 20, 2015 05:35 |  #2

If its any help I tend to leave mine on when using a ballhead but I always have the ballhead quite loose so I can move it easily.
I suppose the easiest thing is suck it and see but one of the birders may have a better idea


Chris
" Age and treachery will always defeat youth and enthusiasm"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Jun 20, 2015 06:14 |  #3

Assuming IS feedback on a tripod is the problem you are concerned with avoiding, see bottom of page one and top of page two.

http://cpn.canon-europe.com …e_stabilization​_lenses.do (external link)


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KaosImagery
Goldmember
Avatar
1,543 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 1955
Joined Sep 2009
Location: near Saratoga Springs, NY
     
Jun 20, 2015 07:11 |  #4

I posted a similar question in the Tamron 150-600 thread about using stabilization with the gimbal mount, specifically when the gimbal was loose, but NOT panning. I number of people responded that they experienced better shots using the stabilization under those conditions.

Now the 100-400 has two IS modes, one for panning, where the Tamron doesn't - so you may be able to use IS for panning as well.


Website (external link) flickr (external link) FaceBook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
4,092 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 657
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Jun 20, 2015 17:55 |  #5

Well take this for what it is worth!
My advice is VERY simple - turn the IS off and leave it there!
When shutter speeds get really low then IS can be very handy - but my subjects demand higher shutter speeds than those where IS is effective so I don't use it. IS will slow down your AF acquisition and does harm/impede AF tracking.
Back at the beginning of 2014 I turned off the IS on all 5 of my IS lenses and got better results and a significantly higher "Hit Rate" - I have yet to turn the IS on again on any (though there are now only 3) of my IS lenses!
Using my Wimberley 2 head on a Gitzo 3530LS tripod I have no problem getting sharp images at 125th sec and that is with my Canon 800 F5.6 L IS, so with a 100-400 I would suggest you turn it off under all circumstances and just keep IS in reserve for when there is no other solution.
Note - as far as I know the 100-400 Mk1 does not have tripod sensing IS so just turn it off if using a tripod.


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
h14nha
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,095 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 179
Joined Nov 2008
Location: South Wales, UK
Post edited over 8 years ago by h14nha.
     
Jun 21, 2015 02:21 |  #6

troutfisher wrote in post #17604186 (external link)
If its any help I tend to leave mine on when using a ballhead but I always have the ballhead quite loose so I can move it easily.
I suppose the easiest thing is suck it and see but one of the birders may have a better idea

Thanks, I have been giving it a go, the head seems really well damped.


Left Handed Brisket wrote in post #17604203 (external link)
Assuming IS feedback on a tripod is the problem you are concerned with avoiding, see bottom of page one and top of page two.

http://cpn.canon-europe.com …e_stabilization​_lenses.do (external link)

Thanks, that confirms it. I knew the original 1-4 wasn't a lens which detected a tripod, but I never knew the science behind it.


cutwater wrote in post #17604235 (external link)
I posted a similar question in the Tamron 150-600 thread about using stabilization with the gimbal mount, specifically when the gimbal was loose, but NOT panning. I number of people responded that they experienced better shots using the stabilization under those conditions.

Now the 100-400 has two IS modes, one for panning, where the Tamron doesn't - so you may be able to use IS for panning as well.

Thanks, I never switch between mode 1 & mode 2, mines left on 1 all the time. To be honest, I never really saw the advantage/disadvantage of each one in real life shooting.


johnf3f wrote in post #17604719 (external link)
Well take this for what it is worth!
My advice is VERY simple - turn the IS off and leave it there!
When shutter speeds get really low then IS can be very handy - but my subjects demand higher shutter speeds than those where IS is effective so I don't use it. IS will slow down your AF acquisition and does harm/impede AF tracking.
Back at the beginning of 2014 I turned off the IS on all 5 of my IS lenses and got better results and a significantly higher "Hit Rate" - I have yet to turn the IS on again on any (though there are now only 3) of my IS lenses!
Using my Wimberley 2 head on a Gitzo 3530LS tripod I have no problem getting sharp images at 125th sec and that is with my Canon 800 F5.6 L IS, so with a 100-400 I would suggest you turn it off under all circumstances and just keep IS in reserve for when there is no other solution.
Note - as far as I know the 100-400 Mk1 does not have tripod sensing IS so just turn it off if using a tripod.

Thanks, I will give it a go, I always try for 1/800 sec shutter speed minimum when birding, so that will help negating the need for IS. Also, when the IS engages it takes a second and if I've only got a the briefest of chances to get a shot, I could be missing out on a few frames whilst IS starts up.

I picked up a Gimbal due to seeing some extremely sharp shots at 600mm with only 1/125 sec shutter speed. Normally a new user to longer lens who is getting blurry shots is always down to those sort of shutter speeds. I thought I'd give it a go. :-)

Thanks to all who took the time to reply.

Ian


Ian
There's no fool like an old skool fool :D
myflickr (external link)
My Gear - 7d, / 16-35mm F4 / 70-200 2.8 II / 100-400 / 300mm 2.8 / 500/4 :D XT-1 Graphite 18/35/56

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,272 views & 2 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Gimbal Head - Image Stabilization or not ? ?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Tripods, Monopods & Other Camera Support 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1463 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.