Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 03 Jul 2015 (Friday) 17:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

IS off while mounting lens?

 
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 416
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Jul 05, 2015 10:35 |  #16

Turning off the camera does not remove power to the lens. You can check this yourself with a volt meter on the the camera's lens contacts.

With the camera turned off the lens will not AF or IS, but if you turn it off while the IS is running, it will continue to run.

Try it yourself if you don't believe me.


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mileslong24
Senior Member
508 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jun 2011
     
Jul 06, 2015 21:38 |  #17

I never turn my camera off unless I'm traveling long distances and have it stored away. I have never turned it off while swapping lenses nor have I turned off IS before doing so. Never had a problem.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,119 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Jul 07, 2015 04:11 |  #18

I thought the important bit with IS (of whatever flavour) was to ensure that the system had spun down, so that the moving elements lock themselves, before changing the lens.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
4,568 posts
Likes: 879
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Jul 07, 2015 06:19 as a reply to  @ BigAl007's post |  #19

If you don't flip the IS off (or VC or VR....this true for any brand) before unmounting, then the elements aren't locked down. You can check by lightly shaking an IS lens: you can hear the elements rattle slightly (and there are threads on the internet with people concerned about a rattling noise when they shake a lens). Personally, I don't worry about it. I'm not throwing my lenses. Since the elements are designed to have movement, I'll just keep IS on...can't see how regular use would damage it


Canon 5D mk IV
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Inspeqtor
I was hit more than 15 times
Avatar
15,584 posts
Gallery: 151 photos
Likes: 8192
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Northern Indiana
     
Jul 07, 2015 06:52 |  #20

msowsun wrote in post #17621326 (external link)
Turning off the camera does not remove power to the lens. You can check this yourself with a volt meter on the the camera's lens contacts.

With the camera turned off the lens will not AF or IS, but if you turn it off while the IS is running, it will continue to run.

Try it yourself if you don't believe me.

Mike,

Are you saying it is possible to check the contacts of the lens while the lens is mounted to the camera? How is this possible?


Charles
Canon EOS 90D * Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM* Flickr Account (external link)
Tokina AT-X Pro DX 11-20 f/2.8 * Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 DC Macro OS * Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM Contemporary
Canon 18-55 IS Kit Lens * Canon 70-300 IS USM * Canon 50mm f1.8 * Canon 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artyH
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,118 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 07, 2015 08:00 |  #21

It sounds like Mike is saying that even with the power off, there is power at the lens contacts on the mount. I am not surprised, given the activation of the light on the SD indicator when you insert a card, even with power off. I would guess that it would make sense to wait a few seconds for IS to power down after turning off the camera-before removing the IS lens.
Turning IS off on the lens would be a safe way to go, but that means you have to remember to do it. I have never done this. When changing lenses, I am usually in a hurry, since I want to minimize the time that the body is open and vulnerable to dust. Hurrying is probably not a good idea.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smythie
I wasn't even trying
3,785 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 713
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Sydney - Australia
     
Jul 07, 2015 09:09 |  #22

Inspeqtor wrote in post #17623463 (external link)
Mike,

Are you saying it is possible to check the contacts of the lens while the lens is mounted to the camera? How is this possible?

I think he's suggesting checking the contacts on the camera body rather than the back of the lens


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Reservoir ­ Dog
A Band Apart
Avatar
3,422 posts
Gallery: 487 photos
Best ofs: 9
Likes: 658
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Out of the pack
     
Jul 07, 2015 09:27 |  #23

I have never turned anything off, nor the camera nor the IS - VC whatever the lens brand when swapping lenses.


Patrice
150 Free online photos editing application (external link) / 100 Free Desktop Photo Editor Software (external link) / Free Photography eBooks (external link) / My photography blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
docholliday_sc001
My hypocrisy goes only so far.
477 posts
Likes: 355
Joined Jul 2011
     
Jul 07, 2015 10:07 |  #24

davesrose wrote in post #17623448 (external link)
If you don't flip the IS off (or VC or VR....this true for any brand) before unmounting, then the elements aren't locked down. You can check by lightly shaking an IS lens: you can hear the elements rattle slightly (and there are threads on the internet with people concerned about a rattling noise when they shake a lens). Personally, I don't worry about it. I'm not throwing my lenses. Since the elements are designed to have movement, I'll just keep IS on...can't see how regular use would damage it

Actually, that's wrong. If you are actively holding the AF on the lens, it's not locked down. Once you let go of AF for a few seconds, usually < 2s, the IS will power off and return to it's locked home position. The slight rattle is normal, it IS the locked position. When unlocked, it's a LOT sloshier. Try holding the AF with IS on and quickly spin off the lens - you'll notice that the IS unit has 3x more movement than the little rattling noise.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
4,568 posts
Likes: 879
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Post edited over 8 years ago by davesrose.
     
Jul 07, 2015 10:50 |  #25

docholliday_sc001 wrote in post #17623611 (external link)
Actually, that's wrong. If you are actively holding the AF on the lens, it's not locked down. Once you let go of AF for a few seconds, usually < 2s, the IS will power off and return to it's locked home position. The slight rattle is normal, it IS the locked position. When unlocked, it's a LOT sloshier. Try holding the AF with IS on and quickly spin off the lens - you'll notice that the IS unit has 3x more movement than the little rattling noise.

Actually, I don't think so. Unmount a lens with IS on and shake it. Unmount a lens with IS off and shake it. There's less of a rattle if IS has been set to off. Just google Nikon lens rattle and see how many posts are people being self conscious of a rattle (how I found this out was a coworker of mine shooting Nikon was a little perplexed by one of his lenses rattling). Most all responses are that with VR lenses, there's some rattle with VR on. I've found the same is with Canon. There may be more movement if you have unmounted with AF lock and IS on (assume the elements are completely dissengaged as the electronics are trying to compensate), but just leaving the IS switch on does not completely lock the elements in place.


Canon 5D mk IV
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jul 07, 2015 11:01 |  #26

docholliday_sc001 wrote in post #17623611 (external link)
When unlocked, it's a LOT sloshier. Try holding the AF with IS on and quickly spin off the lens - you'll notice that the IS unit has 3x more movement than the little rattling noise.

Do you suppose that that's exactly why Canon said not to do it in the manual?


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
4,568 posts
Likes: 879
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Jul 07, 2015 11:10 as a reply to  @ PhotosGuy's post |  #27

I could see why Canon would state not to unmount a lens while shooting for a number of different reasons:) Lens elements completely floating around with IS, potentially aperture or metering data being locked up...well at least normal operation of a lens shouldn't lead to any damage (or leaving IS on or off).


Canon 5D mk IV
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
docholliday_sc001
My hypocrisy goes only so far.
477 posts
Likes: 355
Joined Jul 2011
     
Jul 07, 2015 12:47 |  #28

davesrose wrote in post #17623647 (external link)
Actually, I don't think so. Unmount a lens with IS on and shake it. Unmount a lens with IS off and shake it. There's less of a rattle if IS has been set to off. Just google Nikon lens rattle and see how many posts are people being self conscious of a rattle (how I found this out was a coworker of mine shooting Nikon was a little perplexed by one of his lenses rattling). Most all responses are that with VR lenses, there's some rattle with VR on. I've found the same is with Canon. There may be more movement if you have unmounted with AF lock and IS on (assume the elements are completely dissengaged as the electronics are trying to compensate), but just leaving the IS switch on does not completely lock the elements in place.

Yes, it is so. If you don't let the 100L IS idle down for 2~3 seconds before dismounting, it'll sound like a marble in a Ball jar. It's why Canon says to wait before dismounting, and why you have to put it back on, and wait for it to lock if you remove the lens in a hurry. As long as the lens is ON - powered by the camera, it won't shake. When it is in the unlocked mode, but WITHOUT POWER, it'll rattle like hell. Been there, done it too many times while switching out the macro in a hurry.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
docholliday_sc001
My hypocrisy goes only so far.
477 posts
Likes: 355
Joined Jul 2011
     
Jul 07, 2015 12:47 |  #29

PhotosGuy wrote in post #17623659 (external link)
Do you suppose that that's exactly why Canon said not to do it in the manual?

Exactly.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
docholliday_sc001
My hypocrisy goes only so far.
477 posts
Likes: 355
Joined Jul 2011
     
Jul 07, 2015 12:56 |  #30

davesrose wrote in post #17623664 (external link)
I could see why Canon would state not to unmount a lens while shooting for a number of different reasons:) Lens elements completely floating around with IS, potentially aperture or metering data being locked up...well at least normal operation of a lens shouldn't lead to any damage (or leaving IS on or off).

When the IS is ON, it provides a dampening field to keep the floating IS unit from smacking the mounts. When it has not been "home positioned" before removing power (not powering off, but abruptly or prematurely removing power from the lens), it is outside that position and floats loosely without dampening.

Canon actually says in the manual (and it's perfectly accurate):
"The image stabilizer operates for about 2 seconds even when your finger is off the shutter button. Do not remove the lens while the stabilizer is in operation. This will cause a malfunction.".

Some lenses are more noticable when this happens, the 100L IS is one of them. The least noticable for me was the 70-200/2.8 L IS II. Yet, with the latter, it will make a VERY noticable CLUNK/CLACK inside the barrel.

All you have to do if this happens is remount the lens, half tap the shutter, wait for a few seconds, and dismount again so that it can home the IS unit and lock down.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,190 views & 1 like for this thread, 17 members have posted to it and it is followed by 9 members.
IS off while mounting lens?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1116 guests, 168 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.