Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Data Storage, Memory Cards & Backup 
Thread started 10 Jul 2015 (Friday) 11:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

I want to make my archive at home accessible anytime/anywhere.

 
Aressem
Goldmember
Avatar
4,368 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 529
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jul 10, 2015 11:41 |  #1

Just like the title says...

I want to make my archive at home accessible anytime/anywhere. I have a PC at home that I don't mind leaving running 24/7. It'd be nice to be able to browse through RAW files via Adobe Bridge on my laptop at work or anywhere else and furthermore, transfer files to my laptop wherever I am and work on those files. Here's what I was thinking... let me know if you can think of an easier way to do this.

My thoughts...

To view files: Setup TeamViewer so that I can take remote control of my PC at home and browse through files using bridges, which is already installed on that pc.

To transfer files: Setup an FTP server on my PC at home, and an FTP client on my laptop to transfer files that I actually want to work on.

Your thoughts?...

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!


Ryan Mackay WEBSITE (external link) | FACEBOOK (external link) | GEAR LIST | Buy & Sell Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoffSobering
Senior Member
Avatar
740 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Madison, WI
     
Jul 10, 2015 11:44 |  #2

That's basically what I do. TeamViewer has a bit of a lag but it is very useful.

I usually transfer files through Google Drive. I think TeamViewer has a file-transfer mechanism built-in, but I haven't tried it.

Cheers,

Geoff S.


http://moving-target-photos.com/ (external link) - My Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aressem
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,368 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 529
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jul 10, 2015 11:46 |  #3

GeoffSobering wrote in post #17627006 (external link)
That's basically what I do. TeamViewer has a bit of a lag but it is very useful.

I usually transfer files through Google Drive. I think TeamViewer has a file-transfer mechanism built-in, but I haven't tried it.

Cheers,

Geoff S.

Sweet. Thanks!


Ryan Mackay WEBSITE (external link) | FACEBOOK (external link) | GEAR LIST | Buy & Sell Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,689 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1073
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 10, 2015 13:32 |  #4

GeoffSobering wrote in post #17627006 (external link)
That's basically what I do. TeamViewer has a bit of a lag but it is very useful.

I usually transfer files through Google Drive. I think TeamViewer has a file-transfer mechanism built-in, but I haven't tried it.

Cheers,

Geoff S.

Yes, TeamViewer has a couple of ways to transfer files directly between computers. The problem is that you're limited to the upload speed of the sending machine which is usually pretty low. I wouldn't want to transfer a bunch of raw files at 1-2 Mbps.

Forget FTP. You don't want to run an FTP server on the Internet unless you can secure it. Google Drive or a similar service is more practical as the files can be uploaded ahead of time, then you're only limited by the download speed at work, which is hopefully higher than the home connection's upload speed.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aressem
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,368 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 529
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jul 10, 2015 13:38 |  #5

mike_d wrote in post #17627139 (external link)
Yes, TeamViewer has a couple of ways to transfer files directly between computers. The problem is that you're limited to the upload speed of the sending machine which is usually pretty low. I wouldn't want to transfer a bunch of raw files at 1-2 Mbps.

Forget FTP. You don't want to run an FTP server on the Internet unless you can secure it. Google Drive or a similar service is more practical as the files can be uploaded ahead of time, then you're only limited by the download speed at work, which is hopefully higher than the home connection's upload speed.

Good point/s! Thanks :)


Ryan Mackay WEBSITE (external link) | FACEBOOK (external link) | GEAR LIST | Buy & Sell Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,710 posts
Likes: 4032
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jul 10, 2015 13:51 |  #6

Why not set up a NAS?


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aressem
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,368 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 529
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jul 10, 2015 13:59 |  #7

gjl711 wrote in post #17627163 (external link)
Why not set up a NAS?

I want it to work with what I already have. NAS is overkill.


Ryan Mackay WEBSITE (external link) | FACEBOOK (external link) | GEAR LIST | Buy & Sell Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 10, 2015 18:04 |  #8

Can you tell us more about why you need to do this? That can influence the recommendation. Is it because you need access to an archive for work? Or is it just something that sounds useful.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sacadelic
Senior Member
Avatar
585 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Post edited over 8 years ago by Sacadelic.
     
Jul 10, 2015 19:25 |  #9

Set up a VPN Server to connect to your home computer. Then then you can just share them over the network. This is one of the things a NAS good for. Not to mention that there is nothing wrong with having another backup in place.


-Sac
Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aressem
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,368 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 529
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jul 10, 2015 22:53 |  #10

tim wrote in post #17627416 (external link)
Can you tell us more about why you need to do this? That can influence the recommendation. Is it because you need access to an archive for work? Or is it just something that sounds useful.

It's just be nice to be able to access files at any time or any location.


Ryan Mackay WEBSITE (external link) | FACEBOOK (external link) | GEAR LIST | Buy & Sell Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 10, 2015 23:07 |  #11

I back up important stuff to Crashplan, I can restore if required. Things I want to access regularly from different locations I put on Dropbox, that's really easy.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bubbygator
I can't tell the difference
Avatar
1,477 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 63
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Sarasota, sunlight, butterflies, fish, Gators, and Seminoles
     
Jul 11, 2015 16:08 |  #12

I only shoot jpg's, so I have less storage requirement. When I discovered "On The Go" (OTG), my problem was solved. I have less than 128GB, only 17,000 pics - so I got an OTG cable for my android phone and a 128GB USB.

As part of my normal backup routine, I copy to the USB key and carry the OTG and USB with me where-ever I go. I can show any photo on my phone this way. You should see the looks on my family/friends faces when I go to an interesting folder of 100-200 pics, hand them my phone, and say swipe away!

Now, I'll grant that's not a solution for everybody - especially folks with Terabytes of RAW pics. But it's a possibility. There are also very small portable (and affordable) SSD's of 500GB-1TB which can be used with modern tablets. I'm so old, though - I'll never need more than 250GB.

So, yeah, the cloud is nice... and I do use it to distribute photos to family/friends/coaches - but OTG is good for me personally.


Gear List
The avatar is my middle grandson. (the TF can't tell the difference, but the fish is frowning and the kid is grinning)
Sarasota, sunlight, butterflies, fish, Gators, and Seminoles

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ShotByTom
Goldmember
Avatar
3,050 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 136
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis
     
Jul 11, 2015 17:56 |  #13

Tim will hate this...but a personal cloud would work for you. I use this: http://www.amazon.com …1&keywords=pers​onal+cloud (external link)

It can be finicky, but it works. I can access all of my photos from anywhere, phone, ipad or laptop.


Gear
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 11, 2015 21:27 |  #14

I just don't like when marketers adopt a term and basically throw away it's meaning. It's not a "personal cloud", it's a disk that's accessible over the Internet.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,689 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1073
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 11, 2015 23:07 |  #15

tim wrote in post #17628437 (external link)
I just don't like when marketers adopt a term and basically throw away it's meaning. It's not a "personal cloud", it's a disk that's accessible over the Internet.

And likely poorly secured. Not the place I'd want my primary data.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,919 views & 2 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it and it is followed by 8 members.
I want to make my archive at home accessible anytime/anywhere.
FORUMS General Gear Talk Data Storage, Memory Cards & Backup 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
673 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.