Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Digital Cameras 
Thread started 13 Jul 2015 (Monday) 12:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sony A7R II impression and images

 
mystik610
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,076 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 12358
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Post edited over 8 years ago by mystik610. (5 edits in all)
     
Aug 28, 2015 05:38 |  #331

According to the DXO mark scores, no material improvement at base ISO compared to the older exmor sensor (D810 used as a proxy to the original a7r), but significant improvement at higher ISO. With the older exmor sensor (D810 and a7r), the DR advantages compared to the Canon are basically null by ISO 600 or so, but thanks to the signal boost (inherited from the a7s) at ISO640, the a7rII consistently has at least a 1 stop advantage over the 5DSR throughout the ISO range.

Note, the D810's composite score for DR is skewed, since its measured at a native ISO of 64. At ISO 100, the D810's DR is not materially better than the a7rII.

IMAGE: http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a321/mystik610/Dynamic%20Range%20_zpsiumbctni.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://s14.photobucket​.com …e%20_zpsiumbctn​i.jpg.html  (external link)

Color sensitivity is also consistently better than the 5DSR throughout the ISO range:

IMAGE: http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a321/mystik610/Color%20Sensitivity%202_zpsldrdj88v.png
IMAGE LINK: http://s14.photobucket​.com …%202_zpsldrdj88​v.png.html  (external link)

Speaking of the A7s, the a7rII basically matches the low light dynamic range of the a7s up to about ISO 6400. From there the a7s pulls away, but is within one stop up to the a7rII's max native ISO:

IMAGE: http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a321/mystik610/Dynamic%20Range_zpsixqmvj6e.png
IMAGE LINK: http://s14.photobucket​.com …ange_zpsixqmvj6​e.png.html  (external link)

Color sensitivity is basically on par with the a7s. This is what has impressed me most about the a7rII's low light performance. The color fidelity is well enough in tact to make useable images at extremely high ISO:

IMAGE: http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a321/mystik610/Color%20Sensitivity_zps7sgsuzym.png
IMAGE LINK: http://s14.photobucket​.com …vity_zps7sgsuzy​m.png.html  (external link)

My interpretation: the a7rII's sensor is probably the most well rounded sensor in the market right now. It's a jack of all trades, master of none, but it has a resolution that is on par with the 5DSr, base ISO DR that is on par with the a7r/D810, and low light DR and color sensitivity that is on par with the a7s. Given that recent cameras have become increasingly more specialized, there is a lot of value in a sensor that can perform at a high level in multiple areas simultaneously.

focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀIV - α7ʀIII
Sigma 14-24 f2.8 ART - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sigma 35 f1.2 ART - Sony 35 1.8 - Sony/Zeiss 55 1.8 - Sony 85GM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
njstacker22
Senior Member
Avatar
703 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 93
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Hamilton, NJ
     
Aug 28, 2015 11:02 |  #332

No personal experience but from what I read the Sony 16-35 if a fantastic lens.


Sony A7ii [Sony FE 16-35mm f/4] [Sony FE 28-70mm] [Rokinon 135mm F2] [Sony 50mm 1.8]
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/djbigley/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon_Shoe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,311 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 550
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Kihei, HI
     
Aug 28, 2015 15:17 as a reply to  @ post 17686065 |  #333

Sounds like they're not ready yet with the lenses.......will be a very nice system once they are though!


Facebook-- http://www.facebook.co​m/AndrewShoemakerPhoto​graphy (external link)
Website----http://andrewshoemaker​photography.com/ (external link)
Nikon D810, Nikon 14-24, Nikon 24-70 F/2.8 VR, Nikon 70-200 VR II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eddie
xpfloyd lookalike
Avatar
14,834 posts
Gallery: 719 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 10955
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
     
Aug 28, 2015 16:02 |  #334

Plenty ready for me. Depends what you shoot


Leica M11 | Leica Q2 | Sony α7RV
Voigtlander 28 f/2 Ulton II | Leica 50 Summilux ASPH
16-35GM | 24GM | 35GM | 85GM | Tamron 35-150 | Sigma 105 Macro Art

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,619 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11006
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
     
Aug 28, 2015 16:13 |  #335

thenextguy wrote in post #17685723 (external link)
Hosted photo: posted by thenextguy in
./showthread.php?p=176​85723&i=i88368809
forum: Sony Digital Cameras



Yay! New Toys! Oh crap, Metabones IV doesn't get here until tomorrow. :(

Congrats!! :) I just got my own 24-70L II yesterday as well. Only thing I don't have is an a7R II. :(


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,619 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11006
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
     
Aug 28, 2015 16:19 |  #336

mystik610 wrote in post #17686084 (external link)
My interpretation: the a7rII's sensor is probably the most well rounded sensor in the market right now.

Well said Carlo. I agree.

Fortunately (for me who doesn't have an a7R II) better DXO scores don't necessarily translate to better pictures and even though my 5DS R doesn't measure up I am still really excited about what I can do with it. These are amazing times - awesome FF sensors avaialble in cameras from Canon, Nikon, and Sony.

The most surprising and delighting measurement in the DXO measurements is that great color sensitivity result for the a7R II. Most impressive.

Enjoy your superior camera!!  :p


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,619 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11006
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
Post edited over 8 years ago by David Arbogast.
     
Aug 28, 2015 16:20 |  #337

Canon_Shoe wrote in post #17686702 (external link)
Sounds like they're not ready yet with the lenses.......will be a very nice system once they are though!

The 11-24mm plays nice on the a7R and would be even more amazing on the a7R II! :D


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon_Shoe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,311 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 550
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Kihei, HI
     
Aug 28, 2015 17:24 as a reply to  @ David Arbogast's post |  #338

I bet! I've come to the conclusion that I don't think I could count on this body with an adapter if I shoot a wedding. If I was to do that, I'd trust the native lenses quite a bit more and their line up just isn't there yet.......I'm sure it will be very soon though. I think the 5DSR or D810 would still be a better fit for myself at this time, but damn I would like to shed some weight from my pack! Anyone think Nikon will be using this sensor soon?


Facebook-- http://www.facebook.co​m/AndrewShoemakerPhoto​graphy (external link)
Website----http://andrewshoemaker​photography.com/ (external link)
Nikon D810, Nikon 14-24, Nikon 24-70 F/2.8 VR, Nikon 70-200 VR II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,619 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11006
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
Post edited over 8 years ago by David Arbogast.
     
Aug 28, 2015 17:30 |  #339

Canon_Shoe wrote in post #17686828 (external link)
I bet! I've come to the conclusion that I don't think I could count on this body with an adapter if I shoot a wedding. If I was to do that, I'd trust the native lenses quite a bit more and their line up just isn't there yet.......I'm sure it will be very soon though. I think the 5DSR or D810 would still be a better fit for myself at this time, but damn I would like to shed some weight from my pack! Anyone think Nikon will be using this sensor soon?

The D810 came out just a year ago - seems like the D820 (or whatever) would get the new sensor and I'm guessing that's another year out. I think the 5D IV will be out before the Nikon update...totally guessing.


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon_Shoe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,311 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 550
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Kihei, HI
     
Aug 28, 2015 17:32 as a reply to  @ David Arbogast's post |  #340

Unless the 5D4 has near the same DR and resolution as the d810, I think it will be a huge let down. No one is really building it up, but Canon has been getting better about letting info leak as much


Facebook-- http://www.facebook.co​m/AndrewShoemakerPhoto​graphy (external link)
Website----http://andrewshoemaker​photography.com/ (external link)
Nikon D810, Nikon 14-24, Nikon 24-70 F/2.8 VR, Nikon 70-200 VR II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thenextguy
Goldmember
Avatar
2,583 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 6504
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Post edited over 8 years ago by thenextguy.
     
Aug 28, 2015 17:57 |  #341

When is the Canon C300 Mark ii out?

We should start seeing soon if Canon can deliver 15 stops of DR as they claim. That would be a good sign for the next 5D if they do.

And since I've finally jumped ship and plan to go to a Sony body, I'm sure the 5D4 will be the best camera ever. :lol:


Steve -- Website (external link) -- Instagram (external link) -- 500px (external link)
Canon 5Ds R | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 35 F2 IS | 50mm f/1.4 | 70-200L f/2.8 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mystik610
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,076 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 12358
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Post edited over 8 years ago by mystik610.
     
Aug 28, 2015 18:38 |  #342

David Arbogast wrote in post #17686769 (external link)
Well said Carlo. I agree.

Fortunately (for me who doesn't have an a7R II) better DXO scores don't necessarily translate to better pictures and even though my 5DS R doesn't measure up I am still really excited about what I can do with it. These are amazing times - awesome FF sensors avaialble in cameras from Canon, Nikon, and Sony.

The most surprising and delighting measurement in the DXO measurements is that great color sensitivity result for the a7R II. Most impressive.

Enjoy your superior camera!!  :p

Lol. If this came off as some sort of camera pissing contest I didn't mean it to. Working in finance has wired me into a data and chart junkie.

The DXO data is what it is. It's useful for hard quantitative data that isn't obscured by the subjectivity that exists in all things photography. I've also found it to represent each of the cameras I've owned quite fairly.

The interpretation of the data and decisions about the materiality of the movements of the data points in terms of real world photos is, however, completely subjective...and it should be as we all have different needs based on what we shoot. All of these cameras have improved to the point that realistically, we'll very rarely hit the boundaries of their weaknesses. We have people pushing the 5DSR 5stops to highlight shadow noise, and 100 % crops at +5EV to find compression artifacts in the a7rII. If that's what it takes to seriously fault any of these cameras, I'd say that they're all basically phenomenal. No superior camera between the ones compared in my opinion. It's purely a matter of preference.


focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀIV - α7ʀIII
Sigma 14-24 f2.8 ART - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sigma 35 f1.2 ART - Sony 35 1.8 - Sony/Zeiss 55 1.8 - Sony 85GM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,619 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11006
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
Post edited over 8 years ago by David Arbogast.
     
Aug 28, 2015 19:01 |  #343

mystik610 wrote in post #17686896 (external link)
Lol. If this came off as some sort of camera pissing contest I didn't mean it to. Working in finance has wired me into a data and chart junkie.

The DXO data is what it is. It's useful for hard quantitative data that isn't obscured by the subjectivity that exists in all things photography. I've also found it to represent each of the cameras I've owned quite fairly.

The interpretation of the data and decisions about the materiality of the movements of the data points in terms of real world photos is, however, completely subjective...and it should be as we all have different needs based on what we shoot. All of these cameras have improved to the point that realistically, we'll very rarely hit the boundaries of their weaknesses. We have people pushing the 5DSR 5stops to highlight shadow noise, and 100 % crops at +5EV to find compression artifacts in the a7rII. If that's what it takes to seriously fault any of these cameras, I'd say that they're all basically phenomenal. No superior camera between the ones compared in my opinion. It's purely a matter of preference.

No, your post didn't come off like a pissing contest in the least! I was just having a little fun at my own expense. :D Sensor-wise my own view is that it appears that the a7R II appears to have the best (superior) overall sensor right now. BUT, like you, I agree that all three have phenomenal sensors, so that makes it easy to pick what aspect you like best. Great times! :)


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thenextguy
Goldmember
Avatar
2,583 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 6504
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Post edited over 8 years ago by thenextguy.
     
Aug 28, 2015 22:18 |  #344

Took the new baby out with the 24-70 today. The first thing I noticed is that the EFC is incredible. It enhances the IBIS so much.

I never used an A7r, which I heard had an obnoxious shutter that ruined certain exposures due to vibration. However, I do have an A7 II and even on that camera, I thought the shutter was kind of violent. It probably doesn't cause enough of a shake to ruin exposures, but the A7r II is incredible at how stable the camera is when I fire it.


Steve -- Website (external link) -- Instagram (external link) -- 500px (external link)
Canon 5Ds R | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 35 F2 IS | 50mm f/1.4 | 70-200L f/2.8 II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mystik610
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,076 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 12358
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Houston, TX
     
Aug 28, 2015 23:05 |  #345

David Arbogast wrote in post #17686916 (external link)
No, your post didn't come off like a pissing contest in the least! I was just having a little fun at my own expense. :D Sensor-wise my own view is that it appears that the a7R II appears to have the best (superior) overall sensor right now. BUT, like you, I agree that all three have phenomenal sensors, so that makes it easy to pick what aspect you like best. Great times! :)

I'd say its the most well rounded sensor, but its hard to say anything is really the "best".

And no need for the self-deprecation David. You'd out-shoot most of us regardless of what camera you had in hand lol


focalpointsphoto.com (external link) - flickr (external link) - Instagram (external link)
α7ʀIV - α7ʀIII
Sigma 14-24 f2.8 ART - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sigma 35 f1.2 ART - Sony 35 1.8 - Sony/Zeiss 55 1.8 - Sony 85GM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

463,662 views & 1,808 likes for this thread, 124 members have posted to it and it is followed by 88 members.
Sony A7R II impression and images
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1784 guests, 118 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.