Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 18 Jul 2015 (Saturday) 08:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lightning shots all mess up. What went wrong?

 
kezug
Senior Member
830 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 245
Joined Mar 2010
Location: N.W. Indiana
Post edited over 8 years ago by kezug. (2 edits in all)
     
Jul 18, 2015 08:07 |  #1

I have been looking forward to shooting lightning for awhile and last nights conditions were perfect. The storm was slow moving and from my location, no rain! So I was able to setup my camera on tripod, focused manually and turned off image stabilizer.

I had the camera in Bulb mode and I was controlling the camera via wifi using EOS remote to NOT get eaten alive by mosquito's.

My camera: 70D with 18-135mm STM lens.
ISO was either 500 or 650 and Av between 9 and 14 at times.
Time taken CST around 11pm

As you can see, I held open the shutter for a variable length of time, once the lighting hit, I would release. From the camera view, these looked good.

I loaded them up into DPP, where I noticed the odd halo/banding and was very disappointed!

What should I have done differently?

IMAGE: http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn84/kezug/Lightning/IMG_6808_01a_zpsuv5a2hj5.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://i302.photobucke​t.com …_6808_01a_zpsuv​5a2hj5.jpg  (external link) on photobucket

IMAGE: http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn84/kezug/Lightning/IMG_6806_01a_zpst1fh9kfv.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://i302.photobucke​t.com …_6806_01a_zpst1​fh9kfv.jpg  (external link) on photobucket

IMAGE: http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn84/kezug/Lightning/IMG_6781_01a_zpsivasmdab.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://i302.photobucke​t.com …_6781_01a_zpsiv​asmdab.jpg  (external link) on photobucket

IMAGE: http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn84/kezug/Lightning/IMG_6773_01a_zpskshtrcpb.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://i302.photobucke​t.com …_6773_01a_zpsks​htrcpb.jpg  (external link) on photobucket

IMAGE: http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn84/kezug/Lightning/IMG_6767_01a_zpsc6wlmrxt.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://i302.photobucke​t.com …_6767_01a_zpsc6​wlmrxt.jpg  (external link) on photobucket

Camera's: 70D, G12 | Len's: 18-135mm IS STM, 55-250mm IS STM, 50mm f/1.8 II | Photos:flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidWatts
Goldmember
Avatar
2,524 posts
Gallery: 128 photos
Likes: 2617
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Chicago Area
     
Jul 18, 2015 12:27 |  #2

I would have set the aperture open more. 9 to 14 is way too tight.


My Smugmug site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
Avatar
7,352 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 5915
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Portland, OR
     
Jul 18, 2015 12:30 |  #3

Halo/banding? I guess I'm not seeing what you're seeing.


Getting better at this - Fuji X-t5 & X-t3 - 16 1.4 - 35/50/90 f2 - 50-140 - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ Deep
Goldmember
Avatar
1,915 posts
Gallery: 95 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 965
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Upstate NY
     
Jul 18, 2015 12:32 |  #4

kezug wrote in post #17635437 (external link)
What should I have done differently?

At that distance, you should have been shooting wide open.

There's also no benefit to using Av when you're not actually exposing any foreground object(s). It's not a show stopper, but you would have been just as well off shooting manual 10-15" continuously.


mikedeep.com (external link) - rocket launch photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 18, 2015 12:42 |  #5

Shoot in manual, do a test exposure to nail the level of ambient you want. Unlesss you want boring isolated lightning bursts you need ambient light for context. Try 15 seconds at 5.6 to see what you get, adjust the time if you need more exposure for the surroundings. After the first strike adjust the aperture to brighten or darken the strike. Just like using flash, you have to balance two exposure values.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kezug
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
830 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 245
Joined Mar 2010
Location: N.W. Indiana
     
Jul 18, 2015 14:15 |  #6

Thank you all for replying....I take it, that my Av needed to be as wide open as possible..perhaps then also allowing for lower ISO overall.

I cant wait till the next storm!


Camera's: 70D, G12 | Len's: 18-135mm IS STM, 55-250mm IS STM, 50mm f/1.8 II | Photos:flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
calypsob
Goldmember
Avatar
1,179 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 91
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Lynchburg Virginia
     
Jul 21, 2015 19:38 |  #7

i disagree with the above, I think your lens had condensation on it, there are very low thick clouds diffusing the lightning, and your iso is too high. Expose longer at a lower iso so you don't pick up the clouds as much.


Wes
-----------
flickr (external link)
Gear: Many gears Yes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 21, 2015 19:46 |  #8

Your aperture doesnt need to be wide open, it really depends on how close the lightning is. In your shots the lightning was distant and behind clouds so you get the dual damage of not bright and not crisp




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,569 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Lightning shots all mess up. What went wrong?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1050 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.