Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 20 Jul 2015 (Monday) 12:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

New 24-105 Lens Creep

 
CaPpedDoG
Member
202 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 873
Joined Dec 2012
Location: Victoria BC, Canada
     
Jul 20, 2015 12:47 |  #1

I purchased a new 5D3 with 24-105. I've never had a problem with lens creep in the past but noticed this 24-105 zooms out when facing down. Would you send it back or just keep it?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gossamer88
"something else"
Avatar
2,656 posts
Gallery: 94 photos
Likes: 9250
Joined Aug 2014
Location: NYC
     
Jul 20, 2015 12:50 |  #2

I would send it back. It'll probably get worse.


EOS R5 | EOS R7 | iPhone 12 Pro
• • •
RF 100-500mm | RF 100-400mm | RF 800mm F11 | RF 600mm F11
RF 24-240mm | RF 50mm 1.8 | RF 35mm 1.8 Macro | RF 16mm 2.8

flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LonelyBoy
Goldmember
1,482 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 1004
Joined Oct 2014
     
Jul 20, 2015 14:38 |  #3

I got one (same thing, with a 5D3 body) about a month ago. Zero creep, up or down, checked at a few different zoom levels. I'd try to swap it.


https://www.flickr.com​/photos/127590681@N03/ (external link)
I love a like, but feedback (including CC) is even better!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Larry ­ Weinman
Goldmember
1,438 posts
Likes: 66
Joined Jul 2006
     
Jul 21, 2015 08:47 |  #4

If it doesn't have creep now it will have it soon. Creep is standard equipment on this lens and the fact that they didn't put a lock on it makes it especially annoying.


7D Mark II 6D 100mm f 2.8 macro 180mm f 3.5 macro, MP-E-65 300mm f 2.8 500mm f4 Tokina 10-17mm fisheye 10-22mm 17-55mm 24-105mm 70-300mm 70-200 f 2.8 Mk II 100-400mm Mk II 1.4 TCIII 2X TCIII 580EX II 430 EX II MT 24 EX Sigma 150-600

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jul 21, 2015 09:04 |  #5

Hmm.. I have a 24-105 that is probably more than 6 years old now and it does not creep. I would send it back for sure.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,772 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16870
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Jul 21, 2015 09:04 |  #6

You will never solve it. Mine had it for 6 years. 4 years into ownership I sent it in for servicing and asked service to adjust for the creep. Worked great for a few months and then came back. My 24-70 II has a lock for that.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
     
Jul 21, 2015 10:22 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

I have a 24-105 STM. It is sharper than the 24-105, at any settings. It has less distortion at the wide end. It is 1/3 stop faster at the wide end. It is boat-loads sharper at the long end. It has much improved IS. It cost 1/2 the price of a used 24-105L. STM focus during video is hugely improved with STM lenses, even on cameras without DPAF. And (drum-roll, please) it has a zoom-lock. And the price I pay for all of that is: it is 1-stop slower aperture at the long end. My 6D can handle that. Just sayin'... :)


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,772 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16870
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Jul 21, 2015 12:11 |  #8

GeoKras1989 wrote in post #17638965 (external link)
I have a 24-105 STM. It is sharper than the 24-105, at any settings. It has less distortion at the wide end. It is 1/3 stop faster at the wide end. It is boat-loads sharper at the long end. It has much improved IS. It cost 1/2 the price of a used 24-105L. STM focus during video is hugely improved with STM lenses, even on cameras without DPAF. And (drum-roll, please) it has a zoom-lock. And the price I pay for all of that is: it is 1-stop slower aperture at the long end. My 6D can handle that. Just sayin'... :)

A little off topic but I'm pretty sure I'll be getting the 55-250 STM for my trip to Europe this fall. I have been reading very good things about the STM lenses.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kiwi ­ Sean
Mostly Lurking
12 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2011
     
Jul 22, 2015 02:35 |  #9

I had a similar experience to Digital Paradise... Except my lens went in for service after 1 year and I was told that they couldn't (wouldn't?) fix the zoom creep. That was Canon New Zealand... You might have better luck dealing with Canon in a first world country.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PitaDaVespa
Member
82 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 12
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Alentejo - Portugal
     
Jul 22, 2015 06:30 as a reply to  @ Kiwi Sean's post |  #10

Mine has a bit o zoom creep between 24-70mm, but only when pointed down.
I took it to Canon CPS and they got it solved, but it reappeared a few month back.

As far as I know, it's not solvable. The lens is a 4x zoom, f4 with lot's of heavy elements inside. Period.

Canon says same users actually prefer them with the zoom creep, since the zoom ring is smoother. ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LonelyBoy
Goldmember
1,482 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 1004
Joined Oct 2014
     
Jul 22, 2015 15:28 |  #11

digital paradise wrote in post #17639133 (external link)
A little off topic but I'm pretty sure I'll be getting the 55-250 STM for my trip to Europe this fall. I have been reading very good things about the STM lenses.

Yeah, I keep correcting people who say that they're mostly for video users. Great build, great value. I kinda want to get a 7D2 just to make proper use of my 18-135...

I'd have been all over the 24-105 STM if they had kept it at f/4.


https://www.flickr.com​/photos/127590681@N03/ (external link)
I love a like, but feedback (including CC) is even better!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Post edited over 8 years ago by Left Handed Brisket. (2 edits in all)
     
Jul 22, 2015 16:12 |  #12

just took mine out of the camera drawer and shook it around a bit upside down, zero creep.

lens is 2 years old.

the zoom is a little stiffer at 24 than 70-105 even zoomed in a bit and shook around there was no creep.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,772 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16870
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Jul 22, 2015 16:56 |  #13

Left Handed Brisket wrote in post #17640658 (external link)
just took mine out of the camera drawer and shook it around a bit upside down, zero creep.

lens is 2 years old.

the zoom is a little stiffer at 24 than 70-105 even zoomed in a bit and shook around there was no creep.

Have you walked around for a an hour or so with the lens pointing down? Mine creeped when I was mot testing it for creep.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Jul 22, 2015 17:17 |  #14

I got this and it solved the lens creep issue.

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …A&is=REG&m=Y&A=​details&Q= (external link)


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Jul 22, 2015 17:38 |  #15

digital paradise wrote in post #17640694 (external link)
Have you walked around for a an hour or so with the lens pointing down? Mine creeped when I was mot testing it for creep.

no way of saying this with out it sounding like i'm a wise ass :D that's not my intention, but, i don't walk around for an hour with my camera on my neck pointing down. I would put it in my bag if not shooting.

i shook it pretty hard, harder than i would be probably be walking … and just did it again … no creep. I have taken this lens on hikes up the Blue Ridge Mountains and not noticed the issue.

I have an old 70-210 that will quickly go from 70-120 as soon as you turn it downward. Past that it is not as likely to creep unless shaken hard. I don't expect a 20+ year old lens to be perfect.

i guess what i am trying to say is that if your 24-105 just flops around as you are trying to compose a shot below you, send it back. If you have to jostle it around for a few minutes to get it to creep, and it bothers you, you need to get a lens with an internal zoom mechanism.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,038 views & 2 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
New 24-105 Lens Creep
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1158 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.