AZ Pix wrote in post #17642961
Did you find the zooms were the way to go in your case, or do you think you could have pulled most of that off with primes? I keep going back to the first two - love all the elements you included in those.
I plan to end the journal with a summary of equipment pro's and con's.
I will say up front my plan was to shoot the 5D MkIII in bad light and close and shoot the 7D MkII once the light was better after sunrise. That said, I got comfortable with the 5D MkIII up to around ISO 5000 and was okay with the 7D MkII up to ISO 3200 but there were conditions where the 5D MkIII got pushed past ISO 10,000 and did fair. The 7D MkII was strong below ISO 1600 and adequate at ISO 3200.
From a lens point of view, I'm really impressed with the 100-400 Ver2. Incredibly sharp and fast focusing. The combo was much lighter than my 400mm DO (ver 1) or my beast of a 500mm f/4 (ver 1 also). We were close enough that the lens length was ample. Several on the trip had the 300mm f/2.8 and I envied their ability to shoot higher shutter speeds in low light, but upon examining many of their shots, I found the dof was often too shallow, with the eyes sharp but nose soft and vice versa. For those with fast glass, remember how short the dof gets when you are close to a subject. I love bokeh too, but it's okay to shoot a lion from 30 feet at f/5.6 or f/8. I did feel the twin 100-400 concept created too much overlap. Near the end, I would put the 24-105 on the 7D and the 100-400 on the 5D body. When I wanted more of a sense of place shot, the 24-105 would be put on my 5D MkIII. I had a teleconverter with me also but never used it.