Hi all,
I found someone selling Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di VC for 250 USD (used) in good condition, is this so much for this lens or worth it? Note that this is not PZD version but has VC feature.
Thanks!
chaturanga Member 58 posts Joined Jul 2015 More info | Jul 24, 2015 00:51 | #1 Hi all,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MalVeauX "Looks rough and well used" More info | Jul 24, 2015 05:08 | #2 chaturanga wrote in post #17642451 Hi all, I found someone selling Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di VC for 250 USD (used) in good condition, is this so much for this lens or worth it? Note that this is not PZD version but has VC feature. Thanks! Heya,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 24, 2015 05:16 | #3 Permanent banI am assuming this is an apsc-only lens. If so, 28mm on the wide end will require another lens, for most shooters. I'd rather have 18-55 & 55-250. I hear the STM versions are optically very good. WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ScottM Goldmember More info | Jul 24, 2015 05:18 | #4 GeoKras1989 wrote in post #17642565 I am assuming this is an apsc-only lens. If so, 28mm on the wide end will require another lens, for most shooters. I'd rather have 18-55 & 55-250. I hear the STM versions are optically very good. This is actually a full frame lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 24, 2015 05:30 | #5 Permanent banOK. Then it matters what camera it is being used on. For apsc, I would find the wide end wholly inadequate. The extreme zoom range is also suggestive of less than stellar optical performance. WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I have Canon EOS 500D (Rebel T1i). I am confused now, I am between this lens and Canon 55-250 STM version. What would you buy if you have Canon EOS500D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Permanent banI just looked at a few reviews. This lens is well respected. My beef with it is the range. On a crop-sensor camera, a wide end of 28mm makes no sense. It forces you to have another, wider, lens available. Well, it would force me anyway. If you are going with a two lens solution, the EFs 18-55 STM and EFs 55-250 STM are a good pairing. If you want to stick to one lens, there are some 18-2xx offerings available that make more sense. Canon 18-200. Tamron 18-270. Possibly others. I see no advantage to owning a 28-300 lens on a crop camera. Not saying its bad, just that there are better choices. WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jingler Member 71 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2009 More info | Jul 24, 2015 14:10 | #9 Used the Tammy on a trip to Nepal
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks it seems Canon 55-250 is better choice for me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DustyLens Member 221 posts Likes: 69 Joined Dec 2012 Location: Minnesota More info | Jul 25, 2015 10:15 | #12 Yes 55-250 STM is the way to go.... U will LOVE it, I LOVE mine! Dusty Lens
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 972 guests, 142 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||