Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 04 Aug 2015 (Tuesday) 00:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Dassam Falls

 
joy.pdx
Junior Member
22 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Joined May 2015
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by joy.pdx. (2 edits in all)
     
Aug 04, 2015 00:24 |  #1

Requesting feedback on 2 version of this shot and if any on these 2 are keepers.
Thanks,

IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/447/19615595733_e76b44486b_b.jpg
IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/468/20050243560_b6f1542664_b.jpg

joy.pdx
[6D Canon 50mm 1.4] [1000D Tamron 17-50 2.8]
It is all about the light.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JPB ­ the ­ elder
Member
184 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Marietta ,Ga
     
Aug 05, 2015 10:33 |  #2

I think I would try again when they aren't muddy .




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AndyE
Member
202 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Rolla, MO
     
Aug 05, 2015 11:48 |  #3

White balance in the 2nd one seems off. Too warm tones.


Gear: 60D; EF-s 17-55mm; EF 16-35mm f/4 L IS; EF 50mm f/1.8; EF 28mm f/2.8; Tamron 70-300mm
http://www.eckertphoto​graphy.net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joy.pdx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
22 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Joined May 2015
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
     
Aug 06, 2015 23:15 |  #4

Thanks for the feedback. They were very helpful.


joy.pdx
[6D Canon 50mm 1.4] [1000D Tamron 17-50 2.8]
It is all about the light.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Didereaux
Senior Member
Avatar
415 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 256
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Upper Texas coast
Post edited over 8 years ago by Didereaux.
     
Aug 07, 2015 18:28 |  #5

joy.pdx wrote in post #17655632 (external link)
Requesting feedback on 2 version of this shot and if any on these 2 are keepers.
Thanks,

As hs been said the second shots WB is completely haywire. Now to the first: The it needs some judicious cropping. Notice that the leaning tree on the right intersects with the top of the waterfall making the waterfall look tilted. So crop off at least past the trunk of that tree. On the left you can crop most of the tree off od that as well. I think enough to make a square crop of the picture. Then go to work and lower the saturation a wee bit on your orange and yellow. This will reduce the muddiness of the water and have little effect on the rest of the picture. Then carefully search for a balance of contrast and whiteness. Your histogram shows you at about as far to the left as you dare go so put most of the emphasis on the highlights to the right. Just tweak. Step back and see if that helps, and gives you further hints on where to go, if necessary, from there.


Couple of Canon bodies, a couple of Canon lens, few gadgets all stuffed in a bag...and a stick, and a tripod.
https://www.flickr.com …ringandmontepho​tos/albums (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joy.pdx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
22 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Joined May 2015
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by joy.pdx.
     
Aug 07, 2015 23:55 as a reply to  @ Didereaux's post |  #6

Thanks. Good suggestions. Here is another attempt. Histogram should be better now. Saturation has been tweeked .

IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/435/20396076861_4ef97f14c3_b.jpg

joy.pdx
[6D Canon 50mm 1.4] [1000D Tamron 17-50 2.8]
It is all about the light.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Didereaux
Senior Member
Avatar
415 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 256
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Upper Texas coast
     
Aug 08, 2015 02:20 |  #7

joy.pdx wrote in post #17660541 (external link)
Thanks. Good suggestions. Here is another attempt. Histogram should be better now. Saturation has been tweeked .


To me anyway, that is much improved. Good job.


Couple of Canon bodies, a couple of Canon lens, few gadgets all stuffed in a bag...and a stick, and a tripod.
https://www.flickr.com …ringandmontepho​tos/albums (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joy.pdx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
22 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Joined May 2015
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
     
Aug 08, 2015 09:48 |  #8

Another view.

IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/437/20212584200_161bd2e81a_b.jpg

joy.pdx
[6D Canon 50mm 1.4] [1000D Tamron 17-50 2.8]
It is all about the light.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Didereaux
Senior Member
Avatar
415 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 256
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Upper Texas coast
     
Aug 08, 2015 15:18 |  #9

joy.pdx wrote in post #17660878 (external link)
Another view.


Better view, terrible exposure.


Couple of Canon bodies, a couple of Canon lens, few gadgets all stuffed in a bag...and a stick, and a tripod.
https://www.flickr.com …ringandmontepho​tos/albums (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joy.pdx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
22 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Joined May 2015
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by joy.pdx. (2 edits in all)
     
Aug 09, 2015 00:59 as a reply to  @ Didereaux's post |  #10

The shutter speed could have been higher also. The water details did not come out that well as the previous.


joy.pdx
[6D Canon 50mm 1.4] [1000D Tamron 17-50 2.8]
It is all about the light.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Didereaux
Senior Member
Avatar
415 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 256
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Upper Texas coast
Post edited over 8 years ago by Didereaux.
     
Aug 09, 2015 05:26 as a reply to  @ joy.pdx's post |  #11

hope you don't mind (didn't see a no edit) so here is my version. Needs a tad more, but you get the idea.

IMAGE: http://i.imgur.com/zIJhQJq.jpg

Couple of Canon bodies, a couple of Canon lens, few gadgets all stuffed in a bag...and a stick, and a tripod.
https://www.flickr.com …ringandmontepho​tos/albums (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joy.pdx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
22 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Joined May 2015
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
     
Aug 09, 2015 13:26 |  #12

Didereaux wrote in post #17661806 (external link)
hope you don't mind (didn't see a no edit) so here is my version. Needs a tad more, but you get the idea.

QUOTED IMAGE


Thanks for uploading a version. I think you did very nicely on the water details and I like it. However, the rocks seems to have too much contrast or sharpness.


joy.pdx
[6D Canon 50mm 1.4] [1000D Tamron 17-50 2.8]
It is all about the light.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joy.pdx
THREAD ­ STARTER
Junior Member
22 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Joined May 2015
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by joy.pdx.
     
Aug 09, 2015 14:17 as a reply to  @ Didereaux's post |  #13

On similar lines another attempt.

IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/346/19812763694_e124fc08e7_b.jpg

joy.pdx
[6D Canon 50mm 1.4] [1000D Tamron 17-50 2.8]
It is all about the light.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Didereaux
Senior Member
Avatar
415 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 256
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Upper Texas coast
     
Aug 09, 2015 15:17 as a reply to  @ joy.pdx's post |  #14

Joy, I was not attempting to do your work for you. I was merely doing enough to maybe give you an idea of what can be done. It's your picture, you fix it.


Couple of Canon bodies, a couple of Canon lens, few gadgets all stuffed in a bag...and a stick, and a tripod.
https://www.flickr.com …ringandmontepho​tos/albums (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DagoImaging
Goldmember
Avatar
1,997 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 1327
Joined Nov 2012
     
Aug 09, 2015 15:30 |  #15

Didereaux wrote in post #17661806 (external link)
hope you don't mind (didn't see a no edit) so here is my version. Needs a tad more, but you get the idea.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

This is terrible IMO, if you want to show what can be done, than show good work, not 1/2 quality and muted effects.


Sony a7R3a/a6300/ 16-70/4 / 70-200/4 G / 12-24/4 G/ 24-105/4 G /Sony HVL-60M

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,346 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Dassam Falls
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1110 guests, 191 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.