Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 06 Aug 2015 (Thursday) 09:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 7d mk ii, why so many for sale

 
Phoenixkh
a mere speck
6,863 posts
Gallery: 67 photos
Likes: 1484
Joined May 2011
Location: Gainesville, Florida
     
Aug 06, 2015 13:59 |  #16

I will say this: I don't plan on selling my 7D2 for quite some time. I am enjoying its use. It's not just a sports or birding camera, though it excels at both those genres of photography. I'm using it for interiors (kitchens) and the odd landscape I shoot.

That said, I know there are many very content 1D IV owners out there as well. I've never shot one but it's pretty amazing that it is still that good after, what, 6 years, as was mentioned above?


Kim (the male variety) Canon 1DX2 | 1D IV | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS | 100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
RRS tripod and monopod | 580EXII | Cinch 1 & Loop 3 Special Edition | Editing Encouraged

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GregDunn
Goldmember
Avatar
1,289 posts
Likes: 132
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Indiana
     
Aug 06, 2015 15:06 |  #17

PCousins wrote in post #17658767 (external link)
t's incredible to think that the 1d4 is now coming upto 6 years old whereas the 7d2 is about 1 year old yet they are compared continuously in performance although they have different digic processors and technologies. The 1d4 is still a very popular camera and still goes for very good money

mwsilver wrote in post #17658878 (external link)
Keep in mind that in several respects the 7DII is also being compared favorably as a not so little brother to the 1DX. Not too shabby when you consider the 7DII is available at B&H for $1500, and the 1DX for 3 &1/2 times more at $5300.

Spot on. Remember, the 1D4 - a great camera - is only a 16MP sensor (this is one way to keep the FPS up) and as a 1.3x crop camera has larger pixels than the 7D2. Hence for some applications it will still provide great image quality as well as noise performance. It will not resolve as well as the 1Dx or 7D2 though, and it is much less effective in applications like astrophotography where the 7D2 is currently the best (due to its extraordinarily low read noise).

Bottom line: know what you need from a camera and don't expect one to solve all your photography problems just because it's newer; you're still responsible for the end result. The 7D2, as was pointed out above, has very different sensitivity settings compared to the older systems; I transferred my 5D3 AF settings over verbatim and still needed to make changes to get the best performance out of my 7D2. It's the first camera I've ever owned that I can just pick up and shoot, knowing that it has been configured to my style and will capture the most keepers.


Canon 1Dx | 5D3 | 7D2 | 6D | 70-200L f/2.8IS | 70-200L f/4 | 24-70L f/2.8 | 24-105L f/4IS | 100-400L f/4.5-5.6IS | 17-55 f/2.8IS | 50 f/1.8 | 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 | 4x Godox AD360

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Bob
Goldmember
2,063 posts
Likes: 52
Joined May 2007
Location: Poitou-Charentes, France
     
Aug 06, 2015 16:02 |  #18

I'm sure that there are a multitude of reasons why some folk are moving them on.

Complexity....
The 7D2 would be challenging to someone moving up from a lesser spec'd body and not everyone has the patience.

Its peers (1Dx and 5D3)....
Whilst the AF was marketed as being on par with its peers, it does seem to have more trouble than them when tracking subjects.

Expectations....
1Dx and 5D3 users were hoping for a crop sensored body that could compete and add something to the repetoire.

Faulty/bad examples.....
It's clear that there are many experienced users who can't get the required or advertised performance from their 7D2 and there doesn't seem to be a common solution to the problems being experienced.

My 7D2 was fine in 'one shot' but failed miserably when tracking a simple subject in AIservo, something that isn't an issue with the 1Dx's, or the older system of the 1D4, and it ended up being 4th in the pecking order whenever I went out.

Bob


1Dx2 (2), 5DSR, 1Ds3, 1D4, 5D2(590nm), 5D2(720nm) EF600 EF400 EF300-II EF300 EF200 EF200-II EF180L EF135L EF100 EF85-II EF50L TS-E17/4 TS-E24L-II TS-E45 TS-E90 MP-E65 EF70-200-II EF24-70/2.8-II EF16-35/4 EF8-15/4 EF11-24/4 Zeiss 15/2.8 21/2.8 25/2 28/2 35/1.4 35/2 50/2 85/1.4 100/2 135/2 T/C's L-SC & a WIFE!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PCousins
Goldmember
Avatar
1,758 posts
Gallery: 1191 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 30549
Joined Nov 2014
Location: Weston-Super-Mare (UK)
     
Aug 06, 2015 16:07 |  #19

Going back to the OP.........

mark2009 wrote in post #17658559 (external link)
Have been watching the sell board, seems like a lot of mk ii for sale? Is it a disappointment?

I looked into why peoples had sold on their 7d mk II's there were several comments referring to "Going Over to Sony" or "Moving to Nikon".

As I previously mentioned I am looking for a 1d4 but prices are very very high and they are hard to find a V.Good one and 7d2's are going for very reasonable prices and not that old and plenty of them for sale.

Yes both the 1d4 and 7d2 are great camera's, If I do decide to go for the 7d2 to compliment my FF canon body, then I have to ask the question if the 7d2 is such a great camera then why and for what reason would people go over to Sony for ?

Please can any members explain this as I am totally unfamiliar with Sony Camera's.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Bob
Goldmember
2,063 posts
Likes: 52
Joined May 2007
Location: Poitou-Charentes, France
     
Aug 06, 2015 16:20 |  #20

PCousins wrote in post #17659054 (external link)
....for what reason would people go over to Sony for ?

Please can any members explain this as I am totally unfamiliar with Sony Camera's.

Possibly the cheapest option to use existing Canon lenses without paying 1Dx or 5D3 money.

Bob


1Dx2 (2), 5DSR, 1Ds3, 1D4, 5D2(590nm), 5D2(720nm) EF600 EF400 EF300-II EF300 EF200 EF200-II EF180L EF135L EF100 EF85-II EF50L TS-E17/4 TS-E24L-II TS-E45 TS-E90 MP-E65 EF70-200-II EF24-70/2.8-II EF16-35/4 EF8-15/4 EF11-24/4 Zeiss 15/2.8 21/2.8 25/2 28/2 35/1.4 35/2 50/2 85/1.4 100/2 135/2 T/C's L-SC & a WIFE!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mwsilver
Goldmember
4,103 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 643
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
     
Aug 06, 2015 16:21 |  #21

PCousins wrote in post #17659054 (external link)
Going back to the OP.........

I looked into why peoples had sold on their 7d mk II's there were several comments referring to "Going Over to Sony" or "Moving to Nikon".

As I previously mentioned I am looking for a 1d4 but prices are very very high and they are hard to find a V.Good one and 7d2's are going for very reasonable prices and not that old and plenty of them for sale.

Yes both the 1d4 and 7d2 are great camera's, If I do decide to go for the 7d2 to compliment my FF canon body, then I have to ask the question if the 7d2 is such a great camera then why and for what reason would people go over to Sony for ?

Please can any members explain this as I am totally unfamiliar with Sony Camera's.

Sony sensors have a wider dynamic range and they are smaller and lighter. It doesn't mean their cameras are better on an absolute basis or meet the specific needs of every photographer. Additionally some people just like the latest innovations and all the bells and whistles.


Mark
Nikon Z fc, Nikkor Z 16-50mm, Nikkor Z 40mm f/2, Nikkor Z 28mm f/2.8 (SE), Nikkor Z DX 18-140mm, Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2, Voigtlander 23mm f/1.2, DXO PhotoLab 5 Elite, DXO FilmPack 6 Elite, DXO ViewPoint 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonyxcom
Member
209 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Vallejo CA
     
Aug 06, 2015 16:58 as a reply to  @ mwsilver's post |  #22

I don't think a Sony camera with adapted Canon lens will meet the needs of the 7D2's target audience. That's why.


1DXmkII / 7DmkII / 100-400mkII / 70-200mkII / 24-70mkI / 24-70F4L / 16-35mkI / 50ART / 40STM / 50STM / 1.4xIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Aug 06, 2015 22:24 |  #23

I pulled the trigger on brand new 7d2 for 1150. For that price why not... it'll be for sale soon lol. I'm a gear junkie


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drifter106
Senior Member
Avatar
753 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 178
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Kansas
     
Aug 06, 2015 23:05 |  #24

Talley wrote in post #17659423 (external link)
I pulled the trigger on brand new 7d2 for 1150. For that price why not... it'll be for sale soon lol. I'm a gear junkie


Curious...did you go through Greentoe? Have seen $1149 as the lowest (Gray market) which is ok by me.


Gear
Remember, what is common knowledge to some is a revelation to others.
For the sake of his sorrowful passion, have mercy on us and the whole world.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Aug 07, 2015 15:54 |  #25

mark2009 wrote in post #17658559 (external link)
Have been watching the sell board, seems like a lot of mk ii for sale? Is it a disappointment?

G.A.S. for people who probably don't shoot often, or already had a 1D series.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 8 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Aug 08, 2015 00:11 |  #26

With the increased owner base of the new 5d series, people no longer need the 7d2 for its effective reach, you get basically the same result now with the full camera. Perhaps that is a reason for some of the liquidation of the 7d2?


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mwsilver
Goldmember
4,103 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 643
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Post edited over 8 years ago by mwsilver.
     
Aug 08, 2015 00:23 |  #27

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17660550 (external link)
With the increased owner base of the new 5d series, people no longer need the 7d2 for its effective reach, you get basically the same result now with the full camera. Perhaps that is a reason for some of the liquidation of the 7d2?

Not sure I understand your logic. Are you suggesting the 5DS R with it's bigger sensor will allow crops equal to the 20mp 7D2 so there is no advantage to using a crop body for greater apparent reach? Even so, there are plenty of other reasons to use a 7D Mark II rather than a 5DS R.


Mark
Nikon Z fc, Nikkor Z 16-50mm, Nikkor Z 40mm f/2, Nikkor Z 28mm f/2.8 (SE), Nikkor Z DX 18-140mm, Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2, Voigtlander 23mm f/1.2, DXO PhotoLab 5 Elite, DXO FilmPack 6 Elite, DXO ViewPoint 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 8 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Aug 08, 2015 06:10 |  #28

mwsilver wrote in post #17660557 (external link)
Not sure I understand your logic. Are you suggesting the 5DS R with it's bigger sensor will allow crops equal to the 20mp 7D2 so there is no advantage to using a crop body for greater apparent reach? Even so, there are plenty of other reasons to use a 7D Mark II rather than a 5DS R.

That is exactly what I mean, those owners have already done those tests and posted the results here. The results were remarkably similar, even at iso 6400. Yes there are other reasons to own a 7d2, but not everyone may appreciate the fact, or need to use those features.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Aug 08, 2015 07:07 |  #29

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17660703 (external link)
That is exactly what I mean, those owners have already done those tests and posted the results here. The results were remarkably similar, even at iso 6400. Yes there are other reasons to own a 7d2, but not everyone may appreciate the fact, or need to use those features.

For alot of owners I could see that.

I still bought mine for reach, FPS, and the menu options that derived from the 1dx series. The fact that it does excellent video is a plus too. I'll use the 7D2 for video of my kids choir/plays and the 5D3 for photos now.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Aug 08, 2015 08:16 |  #30

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17660550 (external link)
With the increased owner base of the new 5d series, people no longer need the 7d2 for its effective reach, you get basically the same result now with the full camera. Perhaps that is a reason for some of the liquidation of the 7d2?

I kind of doubt it, resolution is hardly why people are attracted to the 7D2 in general (it's barely a wee bit more than the original 7D). I would guess, loosely, that most people going after the 7D2 want it's AF engine (which the 5DR/S lacks) and FPS (which the 5DR/S lacks).

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

20,227 views & 10 likes for this thread, 31 members have posted to it and it is followed by 12 members.
Canon 7d mk ii, why so many for sale
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1519 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.