Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 03 Mar 2006 (Friday) 06:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Does this really look as bad as my daughter says?

 
Meaty0
Goldmember
Avatar
3,519 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Mar 03, 2006 06:16 |  #1

I went climbing last Tuesday and got this image just after sunrise. It had just been raining and I liked the low cloud effect around the mountain.

My daughter was walking past the computer and saw this photo and said, "Hey Dad. I was just watching Jurassic Park with my friends, and that looks like that big pile of steaming dinosaur poo in the movie. You know the scene where he sticks his hand into it...."

Well that's ruined this photo for me, but what do you guys think? Does it have any good qualities?

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chrnat
Senior Member
Avatar
433 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Abu Dhabi
     
Mar 03, 2006 06:59 |  #2

Watching Jurrasic park?

Meatyo - you know better


Canon 1DX & 5d
EF 70 - 200 2.8L USM, EF 85 - 1.2L USM
EF 16 - 35 2.8 L USM, EF 24 - 70 2.8 L USM
2 Espirit Gemini Bowen 500, 3 head courtenay 1000s, 600 EX-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Mar 03, 2006 07:23 as a reply to  @ chrnat's post |  #3

The pic really doesn't do anything for me. It lacks any detail and my eyes wander for something to lock onto. Perhaps a little playing around in PS to get some detail in the foreground.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MisterJP
Member
Avatar
106 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Minneapolis
     
Mar 03, 2006 09:07 as a reply to  @ In2Photos's post |  #4

Cool shot . . . I love moody pictures!

Here's a quick tweak in Levels, with some L moves in LAB to help the detail. Throw in a few selective color edits and now it has some depth.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


______________
www.johnpischke.com (external link)
Canon 5DIII & 5DII • Canon 50 1.4 •
Canon 16-35 2.8L IICanon 24-70 2.8LCanon 100 2.8 Macro • Canon 70-200 2.8L IS • Canon 100-400L • Elinchrom Lights

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
staciecd
Goldmember
Avatar
1,383 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
     
Mar 03, 2006 09:10 |  #5

Interesting image - the Jurassic Park spin that it. I like the depth that MisterJP added, but a neat shot all around.

Stacie


---------------
Digital Rebel XT 350 | Kit Lens, 50mm f/1.8 II, 17-40mm L, 70-200mm f4 L, 70-200mm f2.8 IS, 15mm Fisheye
Speedlight 580EX II, 2 PocketWizard Plus II
Stacie's Portfolio (external link) Updated Feb 2008 | Stacie on Flickr (external link)

---------------

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,813 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Mar 03, 2006 10:38 as a reply to  @ MisterJP's post |  #6

MisterJP wrote:
Cool shot . . . I love moody pictures!

Here's a quick tweak in Levels, with some L moves in LAB to help the detail. Throw in a few selective color edits and now it has some depth.

I like that much better.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beachgirl
Goldmember
Avatar
1,099 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area (south bay)
     
Mar 03, 2006 12:01 as a reply to  @ In2Photos's post |  #7

I like the tweaked version, more color. But very pretty scene.




http://pinksandcastle.​smugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Meaty0
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,519 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Mar 03, 2006 14:56 |  #8

Thanks for the Tweeked version Mister JP. The "original" RAW version, had plenty of foreground detail. Unfortunately going from RAW > TIFF > PS > JPEG > RESIZE > UPLOAD it lost a lot of the foreground detail.

Here's another I took a few minutes later, including foreground. A large storm front was moving in (from left) and it had indeed become very dark and forebodeing. Getting better detail of the township by making it brighter, seems to make it look fake somehow. (Lightning struck the mountain shortly after this...time for me to hide in a cave!!!)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sGu
Goldmember
Avatar
2,372 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Mar 03, 2006 17:04 |  #9

The cloud hides all the details, plus something in the foreground, they were rather distracting. Composition wise, second one is better, yet it's lack of something in the photo.


Beautifully Ordinary | Gu Photography | Still + Motion Pictures
w. guphoto.co.uk
e gu@guphoto.co.uk

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Mar 03, 2006 18:05 |  #10

To me it's solely a composition issue.

The first image is far better than the overly shopped rendering.. it has mood to it,.. and looks like a foggy mountian at sunset should look.. pumping more color in makes it more colorfull, yes,. but it also makes it look odd and wrong.

It looks there was a great moment in lighting and atmosphere waiting to be captured.. and you managed to get a piece of it.. but just not quite the right slice.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,160 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Does this really look as bad as my daughter says?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1602 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.