A couple from a wedding, in July. I Think these came out pretty well, what ya think???
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
Aug 11, 2015 14:08 | #1 A couple from a wedding, in July. I Think these came out pretty well, what ya think??? Image hosted by forum (741484) © flipcrab85 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (741485) © flipcrab85 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Nikon D4, D3s, Nikkor 28-70 2.8, Nikkor 80-200 2.8 af-s, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 14mm 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 11, 2015 14:12 | #2 Good posing but both images look a little blown out. There isn't much color difference in the flowers and some of the lace work in the dress is getting lost, which is a crucial part of bridal portraits. Good job! Canon 6D | Canon Rebel T5i | Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS | Canon 24-70L 2.8 | Canon 17-40L 4.0 | Canon 85 1.8 | Canon 50L 1.2 | Canon 50 2.5 Macro | Canon 580EX II | Canon 430EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yeah, good catch, i see what you are saying... tks Nikon D4, D3s, Nikkor 28-70 2.8, Nikkor 80-200 2.8 af-s, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 14mm 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ElTigreBlanco Senior Member More info | Aug 11, 2015 15:49 | #4 It looks like you had a flash in an umbrella or some sort, correct? I agree that it looks a bit burnt but nothing crazy, are you able to bring highlights down in post? Otherwise I can't say anything bad about the photos, they look great! I like to shoot things...sometimes with a camera!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yes, it was a strobe inside of an umbrella. I brought down the highlights some. improvement? Image hosted by forum (741614) © flipcrab85 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (741615) © flipcrab85 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Nikon D4, D3s, Nikkor 28-70 2.8, Nikkor 80-200 2.8 af-s, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 14mm 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 12, 2015 07:44 | #6 another. just cuz... Image hosted by forum (741616) © flipcrab85 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (741617) © flipcrab85 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Nikon D4, D3s, Nikkor 28-70 2.8, Nikkor 80-200 2.8 af-s, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 14mm 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SereneSpeed Goldmember 1,081 posts Likes: 2537 Joined Jan 2013 More info | Aug 12, 2015 07:45 | #7 I liked the first versions best. I tend to process the way you did - the dress looks white before you dropped the highlights, which to me is more important. I'd bet that you have all of the info in the file and did not loose any data, so in that case, what I do is create a high pass layer and brush it onto the dress to bring out the lace texture even in the bright white areas. https://www.danbcreative.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BrickR Cream of the Crop 5,935 posts Likes: 115 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Dallas TX More info | Aug 12, 2015 15:44 | #8 I like the edits much better. They're all good, but I (and I'm sure the bride will) appreciate being able to see the details in the dress and the colors in the flowers. Spend that much on a dress and not be able to see why is a little disconcerting. My junk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 12, 2015 16:35 | #9 BrickR wrote in post #17666461 I like the edits much better. They're all good, but I (and I'm sure the bride will) appreciate being able to see the details in the dress and the colors in the flowers. Spend that much on a dress and not be able to see why is a little disconcerting. +1 Canon 6D | Canon Rebel T5i | Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS | Canon 24-70L 2.8 | Canon 17-40L 4.0 | Canon 85 1.8 | Canon 50L 1.2 | Canon 50 2.5 Macro | Canon 580EX II | Canon 430EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
agrandexpression Senior Member 448 posts Likes: 137 Joined Apr 2015 More info | Aug 13, 2015 08:05 | #10 I like them with the highlights brought down too, although I wouldn't have been upset with the first ones either.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 14, 2015 20:40 | #11 flipcrab85 wrote in post #17665947 yes, it was a strobe inside of an umbrella. I brought down the highlights some. improvement? Hosted photo: posted by flipcrab85 in ./showthread.php?p=17665947&i=i197068504 forum: Weddings & Other Family Events Hosted photo: posted by flipcrab85 in ./showthread.php?p=17665947&i=i41257102 forum: Weddings & Other Family Events The dress looks very blown out.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 14, 2015 20:42 | #12 flipcrab85 wrote in post #17665956 another. just cuz... Hosted photo: posted by flipcrab85 in ./showthread.php?p=17665956&i=i62253581 forum: Weddings & Other Family Events Hosted photo: posted by flipcrab85 in ./showthread.php?p=17665956&i=i246438679 forum: Weddings & Other Family Events I can't help it but it looks like a piece of hair growing out from her armpit? or is it a piece of thread from the dress?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 887 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||