Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Data Storage, Memory Cards & Backup 
Thread started 12 Aug 2015 (Wednesday) 19:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

CF vs. SD card image quality

 
Quack ­ Me ­ Up
Senior Member
262 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Rogers, MN
     
Aug 12, 2015 19:04 |  #1

Sorry if this has been answered before but I was wondering if there has ever been any testing done to see if there any difference in image quality when an identical image is saved to and SD and a CF card? I'm not talking about saving the same image to both cards simultaneously in cameras that have that option but I'm just curious if there's any image difference between the two formats, all else being equal.
Thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CanonCameraFan
Goldmember
1,694 posts
Likes: 142
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Annapolis Maryland
     
Aug 12, 2015 19:48 |  #2

I can not imagine any reasonable reason for it to be so. It is all the same digital signal, no difference in interpreting it in any manner. Digital is not to lose any info unless there is an actual error. Resolution does not apply. Otherwise, digital checks (CRC Checksum whatever...) would not be possible.


EOS 7D w/BG-E7 (3), 550EX (3), 430EX II, Vivitar 285HV, Opteka 6.5mm/3.5, Canon EF-S 10-18/4.5-5.6 IS STM, Canon EF-S 24/2.8 STM, Canon EF 40/2.8 STM, Canon EF 100mm/2.0 USM, Canon EF 70-300mm/4-5.6 L IS USM, Canon 77mm 500D Macro, Tamrac 614 Bag & 787 Backpack, Crumpler 8 MDH, 7 MDH, 6 MDH
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/johnebersole/se​ts/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wunhang
Senior Member
Avatar
726 posts
Likes: 52
Joined Nov 2009
Location: SoCal
     
Aug 12, 2015 21:13 |  #3

The 1s and 0s of the digital file will be the same no matter it is saved to an SD, CF, or hard drive.


Canon 5D IV | Canon 5D II | XSI (Infrared modified) | SL1 | 16-35mm L f/4.0 IS | 24-70mm L f/2.8 II | 40mm f/2.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 70-200mm L f/4.0 IS | Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 | C/Y 28mm f/2.8 | Tamron 35mm f/1.8 VC | C/Y 50mm f/1.7 | Zeiss 100mm MP
::SmugMug (external link)::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Aug 13, 2015 01:39 |  #4

CanonCameraFan wrote in post #17666748 (external link)
I can not imagine any reasonable reason for it to be so. It is all the same digital signal, no difference in interpreting it in any manner. Digital is not to lose any info unless there is an actual error. Resolution does not apply. Otherwise, digital checks (CRC Checksum whatever...) would not be possible.

You mean those $200 3' HDMI cables aren't any better than my $2 Monoprice ones?  :p




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Amateur
Senior Member
Avatar
358 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 246
Joined Aug 2010
Location: The Netherlands
     
Aug 13, 2015 03:30 as a reply to  @ mike_d's post |  #5

AFAIK SD and CF store digital information and HDMI transports digital information.
And yes, if you try both cables on my television set I would not see the difference.


Canon EOS 1Dx / 5D4 / 5Dsr / Fujifilm X-T4 / Lytro illum

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Aug 13, 2015 09:34 as a reply to  @ mike_d's post |  #6

Depends on how well made the cables are. You can experience differences between cables if one cable isn't well shielded against interference, if the contacts aren't reliable, or if the one cable's more vulnerable to bending than the other. Whether you'd see/hear this through an analog (eyes/ears) interface is another matter. But think about a new set of headphones vs. one that you've been banging around for a while.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Xyclopx
Goldmember
1,714 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 202
Joined Jul 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Post edited over 8 years ago by Xyclopx.
     
Aug 13, 2015 13:00 |  #7

Quack Me Up wrote in post #17666687 (external link)
Sorry if this has been answered before but I was wondering if there has ever been any testing done to see if there any difference in image quality when an identical image is saved to and SD and a CF card? I'm not talking about saving the same image to both cards simultaneously in cameras that have that option but I'm just curious if there's any image difference between the two formats, all else being equal.
Thanks.

i think the answers above are going to be confusing, cause they're not talking about the same mechanism. as jon and others alluded, there are differences in quality among transport systems that can cause small variances, but again, that's not relevant here.

but for your purposes, in the case of your camera saving a picture, the whole advantage of digital is that every copy is identical (vs something analog like film.) so, there will be 0 difference.


Dean Chiang (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear (external link)
My Photos (external link)
Instagram @xyclopx (external link) @feetandeyes (external link) @gastramour (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
Avatar
4,992 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 279
Joined Nov 2011
     
Aug 15, 2015 04:05 |  #8

The format is not different between CF and SD. The format is either RAW or JPEG. There's on difference.


http://emjfotografi.co​m/ (external link)
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 8 years ago by Wilt. (3 edits in all)
     
Aug 15, 2015 11:17 |  #9

If a photo in the camera, (let us assume a four pixel camera, yeah absurd but useful for illustration purposes) the acquired four pixels of data are these


  1. 11000011010101
  2. 11000011011101
  3. 11000011110101
  4. 11000111010101


CF vs. SD merely is a distinction of how 'bits' are grouped when going in/out of the memory card, that's all. Bits get sent to CF in groups of eight (parallel transfer), bits get sent to SD as a string of single bits (serial transfer).
(aside: Does that give you insight why a Canon is faster in storing a photo to CF than it can when storing the same photo in SD?!)


the camera sends that string of 'bits' of data, 8 bits at a time, to a CF card...
11000011 01010111 00001101 11011100 00111101 01110001 11010101

or the camera sends those same string of bits, ONE bit at a time, to an SD card...
1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1

Later, in your computer you can transfer data from a CF card to an SD card...
11000011 01010111 00001101 11011100 00111101 01110001 11010101,
1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1

or vice versa, but apart from how the bits are grouped (or not), it is the same string of bits.

Therefore there is ZERO implication on the 'image quality due to which device stores the photo within a camera, just as there is ZERO implication on the image quality caused by transferring the photos between SD and CF using the computer.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Quack ­ Me ­ Up
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
262 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Rogers, MN
     
Aug 16, 2015 19:44 |  #10

Thanks to all for the input. Very informative.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eelnoraa
Goldmember
1,798 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
     
Aug 23, 2015 04:04 |  #11

absolutely no difference in image quality. because the file is in digital form, not analog.

As to SD, the IOs are NOT one bit at a time, but 4 bits at a time. There are total of 4 IOs in SD card form factor.


5Di, 5Diii, 28, 50, 85, 16-35II, 24-105, 70-200F2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
appdroid
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 58
Joined Dec 2012
Location: Chicago,IL
     
Aug 26, 2015 00:37 |  #12

Yeah i would agree it's just different methods of storage.


EOS R6 Gripped l EOS R Gripped l 24-70 2.8 L II l 70-200 2.8 L II l 16-28 2.8 l 35 1.4 Art l 85 1.8
http://www.Picturesque​byAP.com (external link) flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NinetyEight
"Banned for life"
Avatar
3,207 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Dorset - England
     
Aug 27, 2015 05:16 |  #13

I think something must happen transferring between different media, because quite often an image looks great on my camera lcd display, but when I get back home and transfer it to my PC and look at it in Lightroom or whatever it's not sharp/out of focus and/or badly exposed - It must be the make of hard drive I have... :lol: :lol:


Kev

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,020 views & 2 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
CF vs. SD card image quality
FORUMS General Gear Talk Data Storage, Memory Cards & Backup 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1507 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.