Was he running? Obviously at 1/100 and f/8 something is wrong. I would also try the camera at ISO 400 and higher shutter speed just to see if there is not motion blur. Take a picture of something static. My 55-250 stm IS is very very sharp
gqllc007 Senior Member 445 posts Likes: 133 Joined Jan 2015 More info Post edited over 8 years ago by gqllc007. | Was he running? Obviously at 1/100 and f/8 something is wrong. I would also try the camera at ISO 400 and higher shutter speed just to see if there is not motion blur. Take a picture of something static. My 55-250 stm IS is very very sharp
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Moonshiner Senior Member 795 posts Likes: 1131 Joined Jul 2013 Location: Mil-yucky, Whiskonsin More info | Looks like you are using One Shot focus... You probably had focus lock, but your son moved and therefore you went out of focus. 1/100 is also kind of slow but you have the aperture at F8. You probably would have nailed this with a faster shutter and/or AI Servo.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 17, 2015 08:56 | #33 Is this any better Image hosted by forum (742562) © DigitalDon [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid More info |
Aug 17, 2015 09:52 | #35 DreDaze wrote in post #17672115 Why f16? Well glad you asked.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Archibald You must be quackers! More info | Aug 17, 2015 10:40 | #37 Don, your pics show some blurriness, but they are basically snapshots. Nothing wrong with snapshots, they are one of the joys of digital photography. But often we don't expect technical greatness from casual shots. Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 17, 2015 11:31 | #38 DreDaze wrote in post #17672115 Why f16? My thoughts also. Diffraction limits sharpness on a T3i somewhere past f/6.7 IIRC. By f/16 things will be soft even with perfect focus and a still camera. 5DSR, 6D, 16-35/4L IS, 85L II, 100L macro, Sigma 150-600C
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gqllc007 Senior Member 445 posts Likes: 133 Joined Jan 2015 More info | I have a feeling your lens is fine and its your technique. Bump up that iso to 400 minimum even 800 if you need it
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 18, 2015 06:52 | #40 Archibald wrote in post #17671449 Definitely a sharpness problem here. We need the EXIF. There are three possibilities (at least): misfocusing, defective lens, or motion blur. Have you noticed front- or back-focusing? I mean, you focus on something but something else ends up being in focus instead? Pictures with lots of stuff in front of and behind the subject at the right distances will show that. The design of the kit lens is not at fault here, but it is possibly defective. The EXIF data should be in the out-of-the-camera file, and LR should display that. I am going to go through some photos this morning and look real close at them for front- or back-focusing, best way I can explain it is, if you have ever seen that Clairitin commercial where they are talking about Clairitin Clear and it like somebody pulled a protective film of the camera lens and every thing is crystal clear, well it seems like there is a factory protective film in the camera covering the lens, sensor or something. If there is then fill in the blank for the award I should receive __________ of the ________ Award
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 18, 2015 07:10 | #41 gqllc007 wrote in post #17672047 Was he running? Obviously at 1/100 and f/8 something is wrong. I would also try the camera at ISO 400 and higher shutter speed just to see if there is not motion blur. Take a picture of something static. My 55-250 stm IS is very very sharp I always try to catching him standing still, in that photo he may have been walking. I know better than to take a picture of him while he is running, I will try the higher SS and ISO next time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 18, 2015 07:10 | #42 DigitalDon wrote in post #17673349 I am going to go through some photos this morning and look real close at them for front- or back-focusing, best way I can explain it is, if you have ever seen that Clairitin commercial where they are talking about Clairitin Clear and it like somebody pulled a protective film of the camera lens and every thing is crystal clear, well it seems like there is a factory protective film in the camera covering the lens, sensor or something. If there is then fill in the blank for the award I should receive __________ of the ________ Award Thanks for your help Don
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 18, 2015 07:26 | #43 Moonshiner wrote in post #17672048 Looks like you are using One Shot focus... You probably had focus lock, but your son moved and therefore you went out of focus. 1/100 is also kind of slow but you have the aperture at F8. You probably would have nailed this with a faster shutter and/or AI Servo. Not like it has anything to do with sharpness, but why the spot metering? Perhaps others can provide more insight on your EXIF That makes sense, locked and moved.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I think a EF 85mm 1.8 lens might help.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 18, 2015 08:31 | #45 DreDaze wrote in post #17672145 f16 is certainly not the way to go for the sharpest photos...i'd say for your other photos to bump up the ISO a bit at least...get some faster shutter speeds than 1/100 when shooting kids Is f8 the max? It seems to be, this is the f stop I hear the most about .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is vinceisvisual 1238 guests, 174 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||