Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.		 OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS ➔ Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff ➔ The Lounge 
Thread started 17 Aug 2015 (Monday) 20:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7d Mark II probably would of been better....

1 post, 1 page
1
 
drifter106
Senior Member
Avatar
765 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 178
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Kansas
More info
     
Aug 17, 2015 20:41 |  #1

Granted, I had my 5d Mark III set to shoot as fast as it could but I really think the 7d Mark II would of done a better job...

Canon EOS 5D Mark III • Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM @70mm • 1/1250 • f/4 • ISO 800
IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/08/3/LQ_742680.jpg
Image hosted by forum (742680) © drifter106 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon EOS 5D Mark III • Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM @70mm • 1/1250 • f/4 • ISO 800
IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/08/3/LQ_742681.jpg
Image hosted by forum (742681) © drifter106 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.


I am all for leaving mother nature alone but there were 3 of them around a pond frequented by livestock and children...they had to go.

Gear
Remember, what is common knowledge to some is a revelation to others.
For the sake of his sorrowful passion, have mercy on us and the whole world.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1 post, 1 page
1
676 views & 0 likes for this thread.
7d Mark II probably would of been better....
FORUMS ➔ Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff ➔ The Lounge 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home
Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1503 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.