I was looking at an image at 100% and I see a small "x" with two hot pixels near it. Looked at the next image I took and it wasnt there. Do I need to send my 20D in?
Crashoran Goldmember  1,734 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: Austin,Texas More info | Mar 03, 2006 23:51 | #1 I was looking at an image at 100% and I see a small "x" with two hot pixels near it. Looked at the next image I took and it wasnt there. Do I need to send my 20D in?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me  34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Mar 03, 2006 23:53 | #2 You should post a sample so we see what you mean. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 03, 2006 23:58 | #3 
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith Formerly known as Bluedog_XT  10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | Mar 04, 2006 00:08 | #4 Kinda hard to tell with such a small resolution image on my 1280x1024 monitor.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 04, 2006 00:14 | #5 It was just ISO 1600 f/2.8 @ 1/80
LOG IN TO REPLY |
redhotsheep Goldmember  1,576 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: London More info | If thats 100% on ISO 1600, I would say you camera is absolutely fine!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Mar 04, 2006 05:06 | #7 I see the x you're talking about but not the hot pixels. Kinda wierd but if it never happens again I wouldn't worry about it. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MagentaJoe psycho clown  1,357 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Having breakfast at the circus, with the lions and the clowns. More info | Mar 04, 2006 09:21 | #8 I can get those when I mix the right ingredients - high iso, not so good exposure, long exposure time, and then using photoshop to increase saturation and sharpen. Arguing with a psycho clown can be harmful to your funny bone.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chemicalbro Cream of the Crop  5,245 posts Joined Jun 2005 Location: anywhere but here More info | Mar 06, 2006 14:20 | #9 i assume from the tiny pic you posted it's a picture of a star..(if you posted a wider crop i'd tell you which one Alan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lon10c Senior Member  374 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: St. John, USVI More info | Mar 06, 2006 15:55 | #10 Image processing software such as Photoshop will automatically clean up "hot" pixels and you generally never notice them. -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 06, 2006 21:54 | #11 No, this is definately an "X". I did no editing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1768 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? 
)..........stars are incredibly difficult to focus on..... and if your focus is of even by a tiny bit they tend to cause a little halo (or doughnut shape).this one is also through a cloud, adding to the effect...... add a bit of sharpening in ps and it makes an x....