DarthVader There is no such thing as Title Fairy ever  6,513 posts Likes: 42 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Death Star More info | Sep 08, 2015 06:47 | #1 Nikon/Fuji.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 08, 2015 07:43 | #2 Well... No more talk about a MP war. Canon just destroyed that war and put themselves on top. A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
To be created in conjunction with an 8K video camera.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeftHandedBrisket Combating camera shame since 1977...  More info | Sep 08, 2015 08:33 | #4 DC Fan wrote in post #17699290  And the next complaints wil be... DR OMG! PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.  57,733 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Sep 08, 2015 09:24 | #5 Talley wrote in post #17699263 Correct me if I'm wrong but there is nothing close that can touch this on a 35mm sensor correct? What is the previous best? The 5DS? and then the 36mp sony? Canon also has a 250megapix APS-H CMOS sensor as well and Darpa has created a 1.8 gigapixel sensor. There are a couple of other ones out there. Making them is pretty easy it seems. Making them practically a different story. But if you look at the Canon 250 mp sensor, each photo site is about the same size of a mobile phone sensor so it really is taking mobile camera technology and placing it on a larger sensor. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
eddieb1 Senior Member  986 posts Likes: 227 Joined Apr 2013 Location: Oregon More info | Sep 09, 2015 08:22 | #6 Well, time to start cleaning out a kidney and part of my liver to sell to be able to maybe afford one of those.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dexter75 Senior Member 329 posts Likes: 27 Joined Aug 2015 More info Post edited over 8 years ago by dexter75. (2 edits in all) | Sep 09, 2015 12:00 | #7 250mp on an APS-H sized sensor? Completely useless. Go ahead and stuff 400mp in it. Medium format sensors and Red's amazing Dragon sensor will still produce photo and video that blows this out of the water with far less pixels. I doubt it even beats images off some FF sensors. I thought Canon was smarter than this. They need to be working on something that matters, like FF mirrorless cameras. Canon EOS 6D • EOS 5D | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 • EF 85mm f/1.8 USM • EF 70-200mm f/4L USM • EF 135mm f/2L USM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 09, 2015 15:22 | #9 dexter75 wrote in post #17700954 250mp on an APS-H sized sensor? Completely useless. Go ahead and stuff 400mp in it. Medium format sensors and Red's amazing Dragon sensor will still produce photo and video that blows this out of the water with far less pixels. I doubt it even beats images off some FF sensors. I thought Canon was smarter than this. They need to be working on something that matters, like FF mirrorless cameras. This is for security applications and other areas and not aimed for photography. A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 09, 2015 15:25 | #10 MalVeauX wrote in post #17700990 Heh heh, I can't wait to see the initial 120MP shots of sink faucets, cats and random junk around people's houses.  Very best, I need to see a 120MP shot of a duck before I can decide if I would want it. I come here for your expert opinion. Please do not hesitate to critique or edit.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000)  More info | Sep 09, 2015 15:47 | #11 dexter75 wrote in post #17700954 250mp on an APS-H sized sensor? Completely useless. ... GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scooby_Doo Member 157 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2010 Location: North Dakota More info | Sep 09, 2015 16:13 | #12 I think diminishing returns start to really play a hand in this. Besides a.) what is the noise level on this especially on higher-iso levels? b.) the resolving capabilities of the lens will have a lot of say in this.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
urbanfreestyle I am a squirrel who loves rubbing bottles and I have Nuts in my drawers, too!  More info | I'm happy with the 10mpix on my 1DIII Facebook
LOG IN TO REPLY |
duhgster Member  31 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2015 Location: Napa More info | Sep 09, 2015 16:29 | #14 I can't imagine a need for such a sensor in a camera. It will really be a difficult technical camera to use.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 09, 2015 16:52 | #15 duhgster wrote in post #17701256 I can't imagine a need for such a sensor in a camera. It will really be a difficult technical camera to use. d
A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 915 guests, 117 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
