Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 15 Sep 2015 (Tuesday) 02:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2 nights under the darkest skies I've seen

 
neimad19
Senior Member
Avatar
767 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2012
     
Sep 15, 2015 02:14 |  #1

Wow, it's been awhile since I've visited this forum, over a year, and it seems much has changed since I was here last. Over the last year I've spent many nights honing in on my Nightscape abilities and pushing my technical ability to the max. I'm happy at where I am now, though it took a lot of practice and countless hours scouring the internet for information regarding shooting Landscapes at night. I have fellow member Baz to thank for most of what I know. I hope he still frequents this forum, he has a staggering wealth of information and is a generally great guy. He's inspired me from the beginning and his images were some of the first astro shots I ever saw.

Anyway, last week my wife and I took a trip down to Arches National Park in Utah. The night skies there are immensly dark. It's hard to articulate the beauty of it all without personally experiencing it. None the less I tried my best to capture the scene of the night with a mixture of light painting, patience and high ISO (god bless the 6D for having such a phobia of noise!). I shoot all my nightscapes single image without blending or stacking, some post is done in lightroom of course, but for the most part I try to be fairly purist with my captures..just my own style. Perhaps one day I'll walk down the road of photoshop wizardry, but for now, one image is all I need.

Tent life. Our free camping spot that was conveniently located about 10 minutes out side of the Arches National park gates. Why there were only about 3 other tents at this perfect spot remains a mystery to me.

IMAGE: https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/q90/s720x720/12009633_10206995482901950_5598466593943462509_n.jpg?oh=8e0c624bbf9793a1f55dea7410bac098&oe=569C32E0


Double Arch was hands down my favourite spot to stargaze in the park. Without seeing it for real it's hard to imagine how huge that rock arch is. It's bloody big. Pretty difficult to see us, but there we are at the bottom. Just two tiny specs trying hard to be mindful in the moment and take it all in.
IMAGE: https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xft1/v/t1.0-9/q86/s720x720/12009762_10206988563488969_6012864089825322694_n.jpg?oh=dc36c2f103b06e25905f18c4297c2d49&oe=56A89E26


Tower Of Babel. Being so high, my torch could only just illuminate the top, making it a fairly difficult target to light paint. I managed to squeeze a few precious lumen's out of the rock face in Lightroom.
IMAGE: https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xtp1/v/t1.0-9/q92/s720x720/11145079_10206975834370749_2902260566783159264_n.jpg?oh=9477b28b5dea38604d5e0c20478f1da4&oe=566EDA79

On this night the Night Gods had been particularly kind, blessing me with some of the darkest, sharpest skies I've ever seen. Delicate Arch.
IMAGE: https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfa1/v/t1.0-9/q91/s720x720/11990528_10206969605135022_1916006036957493622_n.jpg?oh=ea565623196bdbe330feb0f9058a825b&oe=56A124D8



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lyn2011
Goldmember
1,165 posts
Gallery: 368 photos
Likes: 2509
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Australia
     
Sep 15, 2015 03:47 |  #2

Amazing pics, specially the second one.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
virginie24jb
Senior Member
955 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1533
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Twizel, New Zealand
     
Sep 15, 2015 07:35 |  #3

Fantastic shots and trip. I hope I can do something similar one day.
Any info the settings and lens you used?


http://www.virginie-bitterlin.com (external link)
http://www.visiting-washington.com (external link)
Instagram (external link) - Facebook (external link)
Canon 6D, Canon T4i/650D, Canon 24-105, 18-135 IS STM, 50 f/1.8, Canon 70-200 f/4, Samyang 14mm f/2.8, Samyang 24mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neimad19
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
767 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2012
     
Sep 15, 2015 09:49 as a reply to  @ virginie24jb's post |  #4

Cheers. Exif is 41 Seconds - f2.8 - ISO 3600 for all. I used my 6D with Samyang 14.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
virginie24jb
Senior Member
955 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1533
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Twizel, New Zealand
     
Sep 15, 2015 10:57 as a reply to  @ neimad19's post |  #5

Thanks!
It seems like a long exposure. Didn't you get startrails?
Why not use a faster shutter speed and use higher ISO? Is it a choice? Did you get better results that way?


http://www.virginie-bitterlin.com (external link)
http://www.visiting-washington.com (external link)
Instagram (external link) - Facebook (external link)
Canon 6D, Canon T4i/650D, Canon 24-105, 18-135 IS STM, 50 f/1.8, Canon 70-200 f/4, Samyang 14mm f/2.8, Samyang 24mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neimad19
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
767 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2012
     
Sep 16, 2015 13:05 as a reply to  @ virginie24jb's post |  #6

At 14mm on a Full Frame star trails don't really become evident till around the 1 minute mark, so 41 seconds is fine. Ramping up the ISO will lead to more noise in the image, so my first priority is always to keep the ISO as low as I possibly can. I also wanted a fairly long exposure to give me enough time to light paint the rock.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AbPho
Goldmember
Avatar
3,166 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 107
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Planet Earth
     
Sep 16, 2015 13:46 |  #7

Wow. Great stuff.


I'm in Canada. Isn't that weird!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Inspeqtor
I was hit more than 15 times
Avatar
15,623 posts
Gallery: 151 photos
Likes: 8215
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Northern Indiana
     
Sep 16, 2015 13:57 |  #8

AbPho wrote in post #17710038 (external link)
Wow. Great stuff.

Agreed!


Charles
Canon EOS 90D * Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM* Flickr Account (external link)
Tokina AT-X Pro DX 11-20 f/2.8 * Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 DC Macro OS * Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM Contemporary
Canon 18-55 IS Kit Lens * Canon 70-300 IS USM * Canon 50mm f1.8 * Canon 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidWatts
Goldmember
Avatar
2,524 posts
Gallery: 128 photos
Likes: 2617
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Chicago Area
Post edited over 8 years ago by DavidWatts.
     
Sep 17, 2015 00:18 as a reply to  @ Inspeqtor's post |  #9

Good Grief! In the fourth pic I see you've found The Guardian of Forever.


My Smugmug site (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mtbdudex
Goldmember
Avatar
1,674 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 193
Joined Nov 2009
Location: SE Michigan
     
Sep 18, 2015 11:21 |  #10

Welcome back to POTN!
Awesome shots, I truly like #2.


Mike R, P.E. ...iMac 27"(i7), iPad2, iPhone14Pro, AppleTV4K, MacBook
Canon: Body R5, lens RF 24-105mm L F4, RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L, 1.4 TC, EF 70-200 L f2.8 IS II / TC 1.4x 2x
FEISOL tripod CT-3441S + CB-40D Ball Head
My top 10 in Astrophotography. . .DIY acoustic panels (external link) . . APOD Aug-5-2011 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neimad19
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
767 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2012
     
Sep 18, 2015 18:00 |  #11

Thanks everyone for the kind words!

~ Damien




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neimad19
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
767 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2012
     
Sep 18, 2015 18:01 as a reply to  @ DavidWatts's post |  #12

Indeed!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Davenn
Senior Member
Avatar
991 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Likes: 490
Joined Jun 2013
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Sep 20, 2015 02:23 |  #13

neimad19 wrote in post #17710000 (external link)
At 14mm on a Full Frame star trails don't really become evident till around the 1 minute mark, so 41 seconds is fine. Ramping up the ISO will lead to more noise in the image, so my first priority is always to keep the ISO as low as I possibly can. I also wanted a fairly long exposure to give me enough time to light paint the rock.

that's a strangely interesting comment, I start seeing star trails after 35 sec with the Samyang 14mm and the FF cam
500 / 14 = 35.7 sec
usually restrict exp to 30 sec to be safe
maybe I need to experiment more ?


Dave


A picture is worth 1000 words ;)
Canon 5D3, 6D, 700D, a bunch of lenses and other bits, ohhh and some Pentax stuff ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neimad19
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
767 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2012
     
Sep 24, 2015 18:41 as a reply to  @ Davenn's post |  #14

The trailing will definitely start at around 35 seconds but, for me, it's hard to really notice them on an uncropped image until about the 60 second mark. After 1 minute exposures, the stars start to become more than just elongated dots, they become obvious little trails. Anything under 1 minute is passable in my books, anything over 1 minute is star trail territory.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PineBomb
I have many notable flaws
Avatar
2,904 posts
Gallery: 244 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3241
Joined Apr 2014
Location: USA
     
Sep 24, 2015 18:50 |  #15

These are great. My favorite is #2, but the light source seems obvious in a distracting way, and could be alleviated in post. That's my only nit. Good job.


-Matt
Website (external link) | flickr (external link) | instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,067 views & 5 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
2 nights under the darkest skies I've seen
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1093 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.