Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 19 Sep 2015 (Saturday) 08:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1D Mark IV Cross type or vertical type AF with 24-70 F4

 
graham121
Goldmember
Avatar
1,988 posts
Gallery: 134 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 22433
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Pakenham, VIC, Aus
Post edited over 8 years ago by graham121.
     
Sep 19, 2015 08:05 |  #1

I am trying to find out as to whether the 24-70 F4 is also one of the F4 max aperture lenses (along with the 17-40 and the 24-105 amongst others) that allow the body to utilise the cross type AF sensors even though they do not have a max aperture of F2.8?

The above two lenses are mentioned in the 1D Mark IV white paper as giving this capability, however the 24-70 F4 lenses came out a couple of years after and I have not been able to find anything anywhere that says it is or is not.

I am looking at a 24-?? walkabout lens to fill my current gap in focal length range, don't want the weight of the F2.8, and am leaning towards the 24-70 over the 24-105 for the better IQ ( mainly distortion at the wide end ) .

But, if it does not utilise the 39 cross point sensors I may well go for the 24-105 and deal with the distortion in post.


A coupla bodies and a few lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
skid00skid00
Senior Member
511 posts
Likes: 43
Joined Mar 2004
     
Sep 19, 2015 11:58 |  #2

I don't see that it's significant if the 105 will use the 'better' AF. If your shooting conditions are that poor, and your demands that high, get the 2.8 v2...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,762 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 19, 2015 21:11 |  #3

Has nothing to do with the lens make. If it has max aperture that is listed then any lens that has that max ap will make it cross type sensitive if canon,sigma or tamron. It's about the amount of light that can get to the focus point to take advantage of the cross type.


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,120 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Sep 19, 2015 21:44 |  #4

05Xrunner wrote in post #17713888 (external link)
Has nothing to do with the lens make. If it has max aperture that is listed then any lens that has that max ap will make it cross type sensitive if canon,sigma or tamron. It's about the amount of light that can get to the focus point to take advantage of the cross type.


Actually for Phase Detect AF it is not about the amount of light that reaches the sensor, it is about the angles that the light arrives at from either side of the aperture opening. That angle will be constant for the same f/number at any focal length. There are also minimum requirements for both level of illumination, and amount of contrast that is arriving at the PDAF sensor, but as long as that minimum level is reached the AF will work.

If it were just a matter of the level of illumination and contrast ratio to enable the PDAF system to work there would be no aperture limit. The CDAF system used during liveview relies only on the level of illumination and contrast level to achieve focus and has no aperture limits, so you could happily AF using CDAF in LV using an f/11 lens, such as any f5.6 with added 2× converter, as long as the subject illumination was bright enough.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
graham121
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,988 posts
Gallery: 134 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 22433
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Pakenham, VIC, Aus
     
Sep 19, 2015 21:48 |  #5

skid00skid00 wrote in post #17713381 (external link)
I don't see that it's significant if the 105 will use the 'better' AF. If your shooting conditions are that poor, and your demands that high, get the 2.8 v2...

Good point; but I was trying to avoid the weight of the 2.8, plus the IS on the 4 is appealing as most of my lower light photography foes not require action to be captured.

05Xrunner wrote in post #17713888 (external link)
Has nothing to do with the lens make. If it has max aperture that is listed then any lens that has that max ap will make it cross type sensitive if canon,sigma or tamron. It's about the amount of light that can get to the focus point to take advantage of the cross type.

Actually in this case it does as Canon have somehow engineered the 1DIV to somehow be able to utilise the f2.8 sensitive cross points on some lens and lens/ converter combos that have a max aperture of f4. However the 24-70 f4 lenses came out after the white paper was published so it is not listed in there as one of the lenses that works this way.

I have not been able to find anything anywhere that states if the cross points are active or not with this lens.


A coupla bodies and a few lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,762 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 19, 2015 21:58 |  #6

Oh never didn't know they did that on the 1d4 to make specific lens use cross type even if was for 2.8. Thought was like most other bodies that if the lens met the fstop then it was activated no matter what lens or brand.


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
docholliday_sc001
My hypocrisy goes only so far.
477 posts
Likes: 355
Joined Jul 2011
Post edited over 8 years ago by docholliday_sc001. (3 edits in all)
     
Sep 19, 2015 22:58 |  #7

05Xrunner wrote in post #17713930 (external link)
Oh never didn't know they did that on the 1d4 to make specific lens use cross type even if was for 2.8. Thought was like most other bodies that if the lens met the fstop then it was activated no matter what lens or brand.

The X is even crazier with it's list of 8 lens groups (A-H) and what will focus where! For example, the 100/2.8L IS is in a different group than the 100/2.8 USM... despite both of them being 2.8 and pretty much the same optics.

The IS is in Group C, where the center 3 columns is cross-type and the edge rows of the outer group is only sensitive to horizontal. The center two columns of the egde group are also cross-type, but less sensitive.

With the USM, the lens is in Group E, where the center 3 columns are cross-type, but all of the outer groups are only horizontal sensitive.

The 24-70/2.8 is another pair arrangement: the v1 lens is similar to the 100L IS, but the center of the center column is dual-cross. With the v2 lens, the whole center column of the center group is dual-cross.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
Avatar
5,762 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 505
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh PA
     
Sep 20, 2015 11:13 |  #8

one of these days I will own a 1DX but I dont think that will be till they are in the $1500 range


My gear

R7, 7D, Canon RF 14-35 f4L, Canon RF 50 1.8 STM, Tamron 70-200 G2, Canon 100-400LII, Canon EF-RF

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,730 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Sep 20, 2015 14:44 |  #9

As more lenses are introduced, even more AF groups are established. For the 1DX, lenses are now arranged in groups A-I, or a total of nine different groups, all with different AF performance.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
docholliday_sc001
My hypocrisy goes only so far.
477 posts
Likes: 355
Joined Jul 2011
     
Sep 20, 2015 17:26 |  #10

apersson850 wrote in post #17714681 (external link)
As more lenses are introduced, even more AF groups are established. For the 1DX, lenses are now arranged in groups A-I, or a total of nine different groups, all with different AF performance.

When did they add group I? And what lenses are in it? The last I saw was Group H!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
docholliday_sc001
My hypocrisy goes only so far.
477 posts
Likes: 355
Joined Jul 2011
     
Sep 20, 2015 17:29 |  #11

05Xrunner wrote in post #17714496 (external link)
one of these days I will own a 1DX but I dont think that will be till they are in the $1500 range

It's a great camera. I have a 1D3 and 1Ds3 also...never thought there'd be as much difference (that I'd use or notice) until I started shooting with it. The low light performance is great, especially with something like the 35/1.4L and Otus 55/1.4! Once you use one, you'll never want to go back to the 1D3!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,730 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Sep 22, 2015 20:50 |  #12

docholliday_sc001 wrote in post #17714903 (external link)
When did they add group I? And what lenses are in it? The last I saw was Group H!

When the 200-400 zoom was introduced. It's the only lens in that group so far.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
docholliday_sc001
My hypocrisy goes only so far.
477 posts
Likes: 355
Joined Jul 2011
     
Sep 22, 2015 23:17 |  #13

apersson850 wrote in post #17718098 (external link)
When the 200-400 zoom was introduced. It's the only lens in that group so far.

Oh, yeah, I completely forgot about seeing that!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,587 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
1D Mark IV Cross type or vertical type AF with 24-70 F4
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
916 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.