Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 19 Sep 2015 (Saturday) 10:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7d Mark II 7D2 - getting the best image sports image in low light

 
javapop
Senior Member
Avatar
742 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by javapop.
     
Sep 19, 2015 10:01 |  #1

I tried out a 7D2 earlier this year for a basketball game, and was pretty impressed. I decided to go ahead and replace my 'soon to not be covered by CPS' 1D3 with a new 7D2.

Amazing camera, seems to handle low light much nicer than my 1D3 did. The anti flicker mode really, really does work.

My main observation is that the images seem a little flat. Now, I am shooting in faithful picture style; but bumped up contrast by 1 to see if that would help a little. Here's one shot from last night, only the exposure was bumped up a little.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/09/3/LQ_748746.jpg
Image hosted by forum (748746) © javapop [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

I was shooting using k white balance since the lighting didn't change. Just looking for any recommendations on shooting images that have a little nicer look out of the camera. (or do I just need to concentrate on post editing?
here's one more, in the middle of the field, no corrections or cropping.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/09/3/LQ_748747.jpg
Image hosted by forum (748747) © javapop [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Sony A7r2|24-70 f/4 FE|85 1.8 FE|28 f/2 FE|Venus Laowa 15mm f/2|Habakkuk 2:2 (external link)|
instagram (external link)David.Stembridge.us (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
m.eo.w
Member
82 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Sep 2015
     
Sep 19, 2015 10:21 |  #2

javapop wrote in post #17713264 (external link)
Here's one shot from last night, only the exposure was bumped up a little.

Try ETTR instead of bumping up exposure in post. You should get slightly less noise that way.

I would tone down the highlights slightly to make the white uniforms a bit less overbearing.

Experiment with WB and color tone; the first image especially looks a bit too green to my eyes

Also, a little NR wouldn't hurt.


Canon 1Dx - Sigma 120-300 2.8
Canon 5DII - Canon 24-70 L 2.8
Canon 7D - Canon 40STM 2.8
Canon FT - 55 1.2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JWdlft
Senior Member
336 posts
Likes: 67
Joined Feb 2013
     
Sep 19, 2015 10:56 |  #3

Have you read the picture style characteristics (page 161-162 of the PDF English manual)?
According to the manual:
Faithful: Suited for processing the image with a computer ... Images will appear subdued.
Neutral: Suited for processing the image with a computer. For natural colors and subdued images.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
javapop
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
742 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
     
Sep 19, 2015 11:00 as a reply to  @ m.eo.w's post |  #4

Thanks for the tips. How can I use ETTR with the camera in post? Whats the technique you'd recommend?

I had high ISO noise reduction set on standard. Highlight tone priority turned was off. I should have done a manual WB; but didn't. I will be trying to find an adjustment so I can apply to all the ones I use since they were consistent kelvin.


Sony A7r2|24-70 f/4 FE|85 1.8 FE|28 f/2 FE|Venus Laowa 15mm f/2|Habakkuk 2:2 (external link)|
instagram (external link)David.Stembridge.us (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,908 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Sep 19, 2015 11:04 |  #5

m.eo.w wrote in post #17713285 (external link)
..

Experiment with WB and color tone; the first image especially looks a bit too green to my eyes

Also, a little NR wouldn't hurt.

Ditto, the 2nd image appears much better. WB was my guess. But after reading, I'm not sure why if the setting was manual.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
javapop
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
742 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
     
Sep 19, 2015 11:06 as a reply to  @ JWdlft's post |  #6

Ok @JWdlft You are correct... :)

I was just used to getting a bit different of an image using the same Picture Style with my 1D3, as well as my 6D. It does look a little different. Of course, this is the first 1.6 crop camera I've used since my ol' T2i.

I'll experiment a little more with picture styles!


Sony A7r2|24-70 f/4 FE|85 1.8 FE|28 f/2 FE|Venus Laowa 15mm f/2|Habakkuk 2:2 (external link)|
instagram (external link)David.Stembridge.us (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,908 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by CyberDyneSystems.
     
Sep 19, 2015 11:07 |  #7

javapop wrote in post #17713319 (external link)
Thanks for the tips. How can I use ETTR with the camera in post? Whats the technique you'd recommend?

.

ETTR means shooting as far to the right of the histogram as you can without clipping the highlights, and then in post reducing the exposure. It's sort of the opposite of what you were doing if you are boosting exposure in post.

https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=8534003#p​ost8534003


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
javapop
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
742 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
     
Sep 19, 2015 11:08 as a reply to  @ CyberDyneSystems's post |  #8

I had it set to 5200k ; I should have done a custom white balance... (looked good on the screen on the field)


Sony A7r2|24-70 f/4 FE|85 1.8 FE|28 f/2 FE|Venus Laowa 15mm f/2|Habakkuk 2:2 (external link)|
instagram (external link)David.Stembridge.us (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
javapop
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
742 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
     
Sep 19, 2015 11:11 as a reply to  @ CyberDyneSystems's post |  #9

Thanks for the link @CyberDyneSystems


Sony A7r2|24-70 f/4 FE|85 1.8 FE|28 f/2 FE|Venus Laowa 15mm f/2|Habakkuk 2:2 (external link)|
instagram (external link)David.Stembridge.us (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
javapop
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
742 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
     
Sep 19, 2015 11:41 as a reply to  @ CyberDyneSystems's post |  #10

So, basically, I need to try shooting at a tact higher ISO without blowing the highlights. I know the white uniforms made this a little tricky. I actually bumped up to ISO 8000 thinking I' get more low light detail without having to slow down shutter speed.


Sony A7r2|24-70 f/4 FE|85 1.8 FE|28 f/2 FE|Venus Laowa 15mm f/2|Habakkuk 2:2 (external link)|
instagram (external link)David.Stembridge.us (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
m.eo.w
Member
82 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Sep 2015
Post edited over 8 years ago by m.eo.w. (3 edits in all)
     
Sep 19, 2015 15:49 |  #11

you can look at the histogram to see if you're blowing anything out. not 100% accurate but its a good approximation.

also wb doesn't really matter if you're shooting raw, except for histogram readings. raw files' wb can be changed in post losslessly.

since i mostly shoot on awb cause the lighting at my uni is as nonuniform as it gets. random dark spots as well as different color lights (yellow/white) on the same field

I just fix it in post.


Canon 1Dx - Sigma 120-300 2.8
Canon 5DII - Canon 24-70 L 2.8
Canon 7D - Canon 40STM 2.8
Canon FT - 55 1.2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 8 years ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Sep 21, 2015 07:51 |  #12

m.eo.w wrote in post #17713563 (external link)
you can look at the histogram to see if you're blowing anything out. not 100% accurate but its a good approximation.

also wb doesn't really matter if you're shooting raw, except for histogram readings. raw files' wb can be changed in post losslessly.

since i mostly shoot on awb cause the lighting at my uni is as nonuniform as it gets. random dark spots as well as different color lights (yellow/white) on the same field

I just fix it in post.

Just be sure to recognize that:
- The raw file has a bit more stop headroom available at the ends of the histogram, so if the histogram shows clipping, there might actually not be any in the raw.
- The histogram is taken from the JPG file, not the raw contents.
- The histogram is greatly dependent therefore on your picture style.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vengence
Goldmember
2,103 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Mar 2013
     
Sep 21, 2015 08:00 |  #13

If you're complaints are about the image feeling "flat" without much "pop" and not the noise in the pictures, then ETTR won't fix the problem (though I would still recommend doing it to reduce the noise). The incorrect white balance isn't helping, but that's still not going to be what the photo is missing. The "pop" you are missing is saturation.

http://gdlp01.c-wss.com …15/01/eos7d-mk2-im-en.pdf (external link)

Check out page 161 of the manual, linked above. But long story short, change from faithful to standard and you'll get most of the pop back.

Though, as always, you'll get much better results if you shoot in raw and learn to use lightroom to set these on a per photo basis. Though I understand that's not possible for everyone's workflow, just keep in mind you're leaving a lot on the table by not doing it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
javapop
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
742 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
     
Sep 21, 2015 12:15 as a reply to  @ vengence's post |  #14

@vengence I do shoot RAW, and plan on getting a manual WB the next game, as soon as the lighting is consistent to give that a try. I'll experiment with the picture styles; between that and WB, is where I've had the issues most likely.


Sony A7r2|24-70 f/4 FE|85 1.8 FE|28 f/2 FE|Venus Laowa 15mm f/2|Habakkuk 2:2 (external link)|
instagram (external link)David.Stembridge.us (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vengence
Goldmember
2,103 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Mar 2013
Post edited over 8 years ago by vengence.
     
Sep 21, 2015 13:23 |  #15

javapop wrote in post #17715971 (external link)
@vengence I do shoot RAW, and plan on getting a manual WB the next game, as soon as the lighting is consistent to give that a try. I'll experiment with the picture styles; between that and WB, is where I've had the issues most likely.

If you're shooting raw then white balance in camera and picture style will have no affect on your image. Both are set by the raw converter (i.e. lightroom or dpp) when you process the image.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,799 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
7d Mark II 7D2 - getting the best image sports image in low light
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
865 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.