Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 22 Sep 2015 (Tuesday) 08:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How to make cameras better

 
dariot98
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Sep 2015
     
Sep 22, 2015 08:47 |  #1

Hello Everyone,

I recently received a school project that requires me to conduct market research on a declining product and use the findings to create a report on how to make the product better?

If you could please fill out the following quick survey it would be greatly appreciated.

https://docs.google.co​m …Nc/viewform?usp​=send_form (external link)

Thank you




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
     
Sep 22, 2015 09:06 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

I am confused. You chose digital cameras as a declining product? That makes little sense with 3/4 of the world's population carrying one around every minute of their lives. Perhaps Nuclear Power Generating Stations would have been a better choice.


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clipper_from_oz
Goldmember
Avatar
4,057 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 33392
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Currently in Darwin Australia
Post edited over 8 years ago by clipper_from_oz.
     
Sep 22, 2015 09:23 |  #3

yes....its very confusing....You would be better off with a product like photographic film which is what Digital is killing

Infact use Fujifilms marketing strategy they used for instant film(Polaroid, Instax etc)....Instant film up to a couple of years ago was in that huge a decline it put the largest producer of instant film (Polaroid) out of business...Howver Fujifilm the lone supplier left of instant film arrested the decline by introducing an instax line of cameras that was aimed squarely at young people who wanted an instant print on demand that digital couldnt give....And then on top of the Intax camera they introduced the instax printer that grew the instant film product further by targeting Digital camera users with a device ( intax printer) that also allowed the digital camera user to give an instax print ....just the same as if they had aN INSTAX CAMERA .......Just think about other ways to grow thAT INSTANT film area and you have your case study

Clipper


Clipper
R5, 5DSR, Fotoman 6x17cm Large Format Panorama Camera,Mamiya Universal 6x9
Canon EF 16-35mm f4 L, 17mm TSE f4 L,50mm f1.4, 24-70 f2.8 L, 70-200mm F4 L, 85mm f1.8, 100-400mm II L,
EF 400mm f2.8 IS II L, RF 600mm f4 IS L
Rodenstock, Sinar& Nikkor LF lens for Pano (75,95,150+210mm)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlakeC
"Dad was a meat cutter"
Avatar
2,673 posts
Gallery: 372 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Jul 2014
Location: West Michigan, USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by BlakeC.
     
Sep 22, 2015 09:34 |  #4

GeoKras1989 wrote in post #17717225 (external link)
I am confused. You chose digital cameras as a declining product? That makes little sense with 3/4 of the world's population carrying one around every minute of their lives. Perhaps Nuclear Power Generating Stations would have been a better choice.

clipper_from_oz wrote in post #17717243 (external link)
yes....its very confusing....You would be better off with a product like film which is what Digital is killing

It's most likely not about a "declining product." It could be, but it could also be a social experiment. We got a ton of these types of questionnaires when I had classes. They tell you one thing but are actually asking for another reason. No harm. But they can't tell you what it is really for, otherwise it would be suggestive questioning.

If it is really about the decline of cameras, it was chosen because it is an easy topic to do. If it is about the decline of cameras, asking on a camera forum is pointless. All of the data will be useless because cameras are obviously not in decline here. You need a random group of individuals of random ages and sexes for more accurate data.


Blake C
BlakeC-Photography.com (external link)
Follow Me on Facebook (external link) , Instagram (external link), or Google+ (external link)
80D |70D | SL1 - Σ 18-35 1.8 ART, Σ 50-100 1.8 ART, Σ 17-50 2.8, Canon 24 2.8 Pancake, Canon 50 1.8 STM, Canon 10-18 STM, Canon 18-135 STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clipper_from_oz
Goldmember
Avatar
4,057 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 33392
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Currently in Darwin Australia
Post edited over 8 years ago by clipper_from_oz. (5 edits in all)
     
Sep 22, 2015 09:46 as a reply to  @ BlakeC's post |  #5

Well I dont thnk it is as easy as you think .....Yes cameras are in decline if you mean standalone cameras vs cameras in smartphones.....But not in massive decline as video cameras like gopro are actually arresting the overall camera decline. You need to break the market down to maybe Single shot cameras if you want to have a good case......Depends on how smart the teacher is marking your paper if you want to try and get away with just general cameras per se..... And even there the actual decline of standalone single shot cameras is being slowed down by the development of smaller high IQ mirrorless cameras like sony , fuji and the others make that are equiped with a optical zoom that goes as high as 40x squarely aimed at smartphone users that nowhave the photographic bug and want more reach than what a little smartphone camera can give ...Thats actually growing on size as are some other camera sub segments ......
Clipper


Clipper
R5, 5DSR, Fotoman 6x17cm Large Format Panorama Camera,Mamiya Universal 6x9
Canon EF 16-35mm f4 L, 17mm TSE f4 L,50mm f1.4, 24-70 f2.8 L, 70-200mm F4 L, 85mm f1.8, 100-400mm II L,
EF 400mm f2.8 IS II L, RF 600mm f4 IS L
Rodenstock, Sinar& Nikkor LF lens for Pano (75,95,150+210mm)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlakeC
"Dad was a meat cutter"
Avatar
2,673 posts
Gallery: 372 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Jul 2014
Location: West Michigan, USA
     
Sep 22, 2015 10:10 |  #6

clipper_from_oz wrote in post #17717260 (external link)
Well I dont thnk it is as easy as you think .....

Easy, as in, an easy subject for the OP to choose as an assignment


Blake C
BlakeC-Photography.com (external link)
Follow Me on Facebook (external link) , Instagram (external link), or Google+ (external link)
80D |70D | SL1 - Σ 18-35 1.8 ART, Σ 50-100 1.8 ART, Σ 17-50 2.8, Canon 24 2.8 Pancake, Canon 50 1.8 STM, Canon 10-18 STM, Canon 18-135 STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
     
Sep 22, 2015 10:14 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

Can't tell cameras are declining in my house. I have 2 35mm film cameras, 2 P&S digitals, 1 full frame digital, and 1 apsc digital. Three of them are upgrades which were purchased this year. And of course, 2 cell phone camera, a video camera, and two computers with web cameras built-in. That is 11 cameras in a house of 2 people. I can tell you that didn't happen very often 20 years ago.

I see no evidence, anywhere, that cameras are a declining product. Next time you go through a traffic regulated intersection, look up. Even in Podunk Backwoods, rural Indiana we have traffic cameras.


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
     
Sep 22, 2015 10:17 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

BlakeC wrote in post #17717277 (external link)
Easy, as in, an easy subject for the OP to choose as an assignment

If you were the instructor, how would you grade an assignment based on an invalid assumption? Doing the wrong thing well, doesn't make it right. Consider the surgeon who does a perfect job of removing your right kidney for donation. How do you rate his performance if you were supposed to get a knee replacement?


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NullMember
Goldmember
3,019 posts
Likes: 1130
Joined Nov 2009
     
Sep 22, 2015 10:21 |  #9
bannedPermanently

GeoKras1989 wrote in post #17717286 (external link)
If you were the instructor, how would you grade an assignment based on an invalid assumption? Doing the wrong thing well, doesn't make it right. Consider the surgeon who does a perfect job of removing your right kidney for donation. How do you rate his performance if you were supposed to get a knee replacement?


Who cares, think of the compensation. £££££££££££££££££




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
     
Sep 22, 2015 10:24 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

john crossley wrote in post #17717294 (external link)
Who cares, think of the compensation. £££££££££££££££££

And I thought suing the pants off of people was a uniquely American pastime. I'd rather just keep the kidney. Money I can always get more of. There is a limited supply of kidneys.


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,734 posts
Likes: 4067
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Sep 22, 2015 10:52 |  #11

dariot98 wrote in post #17717207 (external link)
Hello Everyone,

I recently received a school project that requires me to conduct market research on a declining product and use the findings to create a report on how to make the product better?
...

I have to agree with many above. Cameras are far from decline. There are more now than at any time in history. Maybe if you narrowed it down to a market segment like DSLR cameras or P/S cameras only. The way the survey is worded is too broad.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PineBomb
I have many notable flaws
Avatar
2,914 posts
Gallery: 246 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3265
Joined Apr 2014
Location: USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by PineBomb.
     
Sep 22, 2015 10:56 |  #12

dariot98 wrote in post #17717207 (external link)
Hello Everyone,

I recently received a school project that requires me to conduct market research on a declining product and use the findings to create a report on how to make the product better?

If you could please fill out the following quick survey it would be greatly appreciated.

https://docs.google.co​m …Nc/viewform?usp​=send_form (external link)

Thank you

You've directed this questionnaire to a group that who will undoubtedly skew the data on how much we're willing to spend on a camera and how often we shoot.

Also, while I don't fully reject your underlying assumption that camera purchases are declining, I'm going to ask how you define that "decline." The ubiquity of cell phone cameras have certainly killed sales on p&s cameras in recent years. But there was a remarkable spike in overall camera sales during the 2000s that I think coincided with peak production, quality, supply and demand for DSLRs that were also affordable. The "decline" you speak of occurred in the aftermath of the subprime lending calamity that people are still suffering from today. From what I can tell, current sales of cameras with interchangeable lenses are comparable to a decade ago.

I guess what I'm trying to say, is that with these observations I'm not sure what a "decline" is supposed to look like.


-Matt
Website (external link) | flickr (external link) | instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
longbeachgary
Redwood Original
589 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 160
Joined Aug 2003
     
Sep 22, 2015 11:10 |  #13

Only diehard photogs keep a camera around. The vast majority of photos you see on Facebook, Instagram and Pinterest were taken with smart phones and tablets. The same can be said for watches - most younger people use their phone to tell time.

Gary


Canon R3 (2), RF85L 1.2, RF600 F11, RF800 F11, Canon 14-35L F4, Canon 1DX Mark iii, 100 F2.8 Macro, 135 F2, 200L F2.8, 300L F4, 400L 5.6, 17-40 F4, 24-70 F2.8L, 70-200 F2.8L ii, 70-200 F4 IS, 100-400 L F4.0-5.6, Tamron 150-600.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GeoKras1989
Goldmember
Avatar
4,038 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 262
Joined Jun 2014
Post edited over 8 years ago by GeoKras1989.
     
Sep 22, 2015 12:55 |  #14
bannedPermanent ban

longbeachgary wrote in post #17717362 (external link)
Only diehard photogs keep a camera around. The vast majority of photos you see on Facebook, Instagram and Pinterest were taken with smart phones and tablets. The same can be said for watches - most younger people use their phone to tell time.

Gary

I am certainly a die-hard. I just added a 70D to my closet. That pushes the total in Canon/Canon mount gear to just over $11,000. That does not count the film stuff, the P&S stuff, or the video camera. Just remembered, that doesn't count tripods, light stands, umbrellas, filters, extra batteries... Yep, die-hard.


WARNING: I often dispense advice in fields I know little about!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joedlh
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,515 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 688
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea.
Post edited over 8 years ago by joedlh.
     
Sep 22, 2015 13:14 |  #15

The information that the survey seeks appears to be twofold: (1) how popular instant prints would be from a digital camera and (2) is there is a calling to upload files directly from the camera to social networking. #1 is answered by direct connect printing. Any cell phone can do #2. Maybe someone is looking to put both of these features in a single device. Cell phones are so ubiquitous that you've already got #2. Developing a cheap portable printer for them would address #1.

Maybe the "declining industry" is the instant film camera.


Joe
Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger. Oh you meant gear now. :rolleyes:
http://photo.joedlh.ne​t (external link)
Editing ok

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,746 views & 1 like for this thread, 11 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
How to make cameras better
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
2075 guests, 102 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.