Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 26 Sep 2015 (Saturday) 09:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Need settings for nephews wedding pics with Canon 5Dmk3

 
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Sep 30, 2015 14:19 |  #31

Have a good time forget the bracket. IMO you will look out of place. I NEVER use a bracket. It is a PITA.


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,328 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2516
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by RPCrowe. (2 edits in all)
     
Sep 30, 2015 16:17 |  #32

Unfortunately, I think you will find that many posters expect a newbie to begin with a Bridge Camera and then progress to a Rebel type camera and then, maybe (only maybe) graduate to a camera like a 5D3. IMO, if a person is serious about learning photography the heck with detractors. Begin with the best camera you can afford and don't listen to green-eyed people...

I'll bet that you will be able to get well exposed shots shooting between ISO 200 or 640 maximum and by selecting Programmed exposure mode. I must admit that I don't shoot this way but, the "P" mode is a pretty sure way to get decent (albeit perhaps not the absolute best) exposures. I am posting this image which was shot with bounce flash (see last paragraph) at ISO 200 on P mode which gave me 1/60 second @ f/4 (which was the maximum aperture of my 70-200mm f/4L IS lens).

IMAGE: https://rpcrowe.smugmug.com/photos/i-cgTBM9t/0/L/i-cgTBM9t-L.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://rpcrowe.smugmu​g.com …ional/n-LPGK4/i-cgTBM9t/A  (external link)

I personally like bouncing a flash (off a ceiling or off a wall if the ceiling is too high or too dark). I use a Stroboflash Camera Flip Bracket (better for bouncing than a flash flip model) and a Joe Demb Flash Diffuser Pro. www.dembflashproducts.​com (external link)

See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thewiz4u
Senior Member
Avatar
262 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2007
     
Oct 05, 2015 14:36 |  #33

Sorry man but you're not near ready to take on a wedding. Just say no.


1d mark III and some Lenses.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gqllc007
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
445 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Jan 2015
     
Oct 05, 2015 15:05 |  #34

thewiz4u wrote in post #17733921 (external link)
Sorry man but you're not near ready to take on a wedding. Just say no.

Who is this directed too? If me I am not shooting the wedding I am merely taking some snapshots of my immediate family while I am there




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Biker5005
Mostly Lurking
17 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2015
Post edited over 8 years ago by Biker5005.
     
Oct 05, 2015 16:09 |  #35

Forget the flash bracket, just bounce and use the little pop up white card, you will get results with that, work in ETTL.

A lot of negative replies to your question. Don't bother to approach the hired photographer you are not stepping on his toes, just take your candid's as you stated you were going to do, after all you are a guest. Your flash going off won't affect his pictures. When I photograph weddings there are always other photographers about with nice cameras, with flash, and it does not bother me.

Most brides love the candid's, which very often the hired photographer does not have time to do. In between taking your candid photos watch the hired photographer at work. You can learn a lot of how to do things as well as how not to do things if he is not very good.

Finally don't make mountains out of molehills, as in the advert 'just do it'.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdvaden
Goldmember
Avatar
3,482 posts
Gallery: 95 photos
Likes: 1812
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Medford, Oregon
Post edited over 8 years ago by mdvaden.
     
Oct 19, 2015 11:26 |  #36

Silver-Halide wrote in post #17724963 (external link)
^

The use of flash will affect the metering, ETTL, and exposure of the hired pro. Do him a favor and save yourself some embarrassment by leaving the flash in your bag or better yet, at home.

If anybody is new at this ... it would be me.

But what I learned, is that flash is so instantaneous, that shutter speed isn't fast enough to be as effective control as aperture. So unless someone were firing a modeling light, I wouldn't expect to see much of an issue. Their body in the way would be a possible concern. But if they were out of the way, maybe I'd appreciate them being there.

I recently did a wedding for our son. So did his bride's aunt. I was the only one using flash. And neither one of us got in the way of the other. But back to the flash thing, if it was something to be addressed, I can imagine several solutions to deal with it, as long as the primary professional photographer is allowed the final say to complete what his contract expects.


vadenphotography.com (external link) . . . and . . . Coast Redwoods Main Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gqllc007
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
445 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Jan 2015
     
Oct 19, 2015 12:57 |  #37

These were the two types of snapshots I was talking about from the beginning.
There were 5 photographers there. All were shooting Canon except one Nikon. I found keeping it simple worked the best. I shot in landscape with flash on camera bounced with a 4 x 5 white card velcro to flash head. I started with bracket and flash modifier and I quickly removed those. The large flash bender was cumbersome.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/10/3/LQ_754552.jpg
Image hosted by forum (754552) © gqllc007 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/10/3/LQ_754553.jpg
Image hosted by forum (754553) © gqllc007 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gqllc007
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
445 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Jan 2015
     
Oct 19, 2015 13:14 |  #38

And two more very similar

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/10/3/LQ_754555.jpg
Image hosted by forum (754555) © gqllc007 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/10/3/LQ_754556.jpg
Image hosted by forum (754556) © gqllc007 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlakeC
"Dad was a meat cutter"
Avatar
2,673 posts
Gallery: 372 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Jul 2014
Location: West Michigan, USA
     
Oct 19, 2015 13:24 |  #39

gqllc007 wrote in post #17751940 (external link)
There were 5 photographers there. I found keeping it simple worked the best.
Hosted photo: posted by gqllc007 in
./showthread.php?p=177​51940&i=i261340942
forum: Weddings & Other Family Events

Hosted photo: posted by gqllc007 in
./showthread.php?p=177​51940&i=i217070903
forum: Weddings & Other Family Events

5 "photographers?" Sounds like a nightmare for the paid photog. You can only do your part to stay out of his way I guess. Although, it would be easier on the paid photog if you or another guest told others to stay out of the way.

The photos turned out nice though! And you're right, keep it simple. Your gear is more than capable. Just keep it simple so you can concentrate on taking the photo and not get distracted by any new techniques or gear that you're trying out.


Blake C
BlakeC-Photography.com (external link)
Follow Me on Facebook (external link) , Instagram (external link), or Google+ (external link)
80D |70D | SL1 - Σ 18-35 1.8 ART, Σ 50-100 1.8 ART, Σ 17-50 2.8, Canon 24 2.8 Pancake, Canon 50 1.8 STM, Canon 10-18 STM, Canon 18-135 STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gqllc007
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
445 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Jan 2015
     
Oct 19, 2015 13:53 |  #40

BlakeC wrote in post #17751972 (external link)
5 "photographers?" Sounds like a nightmare for the paid photog. You can only do your part to stay out of his way I guess. Although, it would be easier on the paid photog if you or another guest told others to stay out of the way.

The photos turned out nice though! And you're right, keep it simple. Your gear is more than capable. Just keep it simple so you can concentrate on taking the photo and not get distracted by any new techniques or gear that you're trying out.

The 5 photographers were all the paid ones. Things worked out much better when I went simple. They all were bouncing their flash with a small white card as well and the one nikon user was using the spinlight attached to his flash




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlakeC
"Dad was a meat cutter"
Avatar
2,673 posts
Gallery: 372 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Jul 2014
Location: West Michigan, USA
     
Oct 19, 2015 14:00 |  #41

gqllc007 wrote in post #17752012 (external link)
The 5 photographers were all the paid ones.

wow. seems like overkill. i feel like we need details about this wedding! Were they pros? Was it a high-end wedding? I'm just trying to picture a scenario where someone would hire that many! lol


Blake C
BlakeC-Photography.com (external link)
Follow Me on Facebook (external link) , Instagram (external link), or Google+ (external link)
80D |70D | SL1 - Σ 18-35 1.8 ART, Σ 50-100 1.8 ART, Σ 17-50 2.8, Canon 24 2.8 Pancake, Canon 50 1.8 STM, Canon 10-18 STM, Canon 18-135 STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gqllc007
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
445 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Jan 2015
     
Oct 19, 2015 14:08 |  #42

BlakeC wrote in post #17752027 (external link)
wow. seems like overkill. i feel like we need details about this wedding! Were they pros? Was it a high-end wedding? I'm just trying to picture a scenario where someone would hire that many! lol

Yes high end wedding. Last wedding I took pics at for fun was over $450K (In Chicago)
This one was closer to 200-250K




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlakeC
"Dad was a meat cutter"
Avatar
2,673 posts
Gallery: 372 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Jul 2014
Location: West Michigan, USA
     
Oct 19, 2015 14:10 |  #43

gqllc007 wrote in post #17752044 (external link)
Yes high end wedding. Last wedding I took pics at for fun was over $450K (In Chicago)
This one was closer to 200-250K

Jeez! And these are just people you know?!


Blake C
BlakeC-Photography.com (external link)
Follow Me on Facebook (external link) , Instagram (external link), or Google+ (external link)
80D |70D | SL1 - Σ 18-35 1.8 ART, Σ 50-100 1.8 ART, Σ 17-50 2.8, Canon 24 2.8 Pancake, Canon 50 1.8 STM, Canon 10-18 STM, Canon 18-135 STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gqllc007
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
445 posts
Likes: 133
Joined Jan 2015
     
Oct 19, 2015 14:32 |  #44

BlakeC wrote in post #17752051 (external link)
Jeez! And these are just people you know?!

No not really. The one in Chicago was nephew and this one was my other nephew. I am the black sheep of the family! My 17 year old in the picture said even the worst guy on a winning team isn't doing so badly...LOL The pics are my wife and I in the outdoor pic (my son took it) and my son and mom in the other one




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlakeC
"Dad was a meat cutter"
Avatar
2,673 posts
Gallery: 372 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Jul 2014
Location: West Michigan, USA
     
Oct 19, 2015 14:47 |  #45

gqllc007 wrote in post #17752073 (external link)
No not really. The one in Chicago was nephew and this one was my other nephew. I am the black sheep of the family! My 17 year old in the picture said even the worst guy on a winning team isn't doing so badly...LOL The pics are my wife and I in the outdoor pic (my son took it) and my son and mom in the other one

Ha. True!


Blake C
BlakeC-Photography.com (external link)
Follow Me on Facebook (external link) , Instagram (external link), or Google+ (external link)
80D |70D | SL1 - Σ 18-35 1.8 ART, Σ 50-100 1.8 ART, Σ 17-50 2.8, Canon 24 2.8 Pancake, Canon 50 1.8 STM, Canon 10-18 STM, Canon 18-135 STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,131 views & 15 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it and it is followed by 9 members.
Need settings for nephews wedding pics with Canon 5Dmk3
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
914 guests, 165 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.