njstacker22 wrote in post #17765710
As someone who has over 100k images this is completely terrifying.
Yep.
Especially if you make money from your images, or just hate to see your "memories" get lost, an offsite backup is very important.
Online backup services are convenient, though slow.
Backing up to an external hard drive and physically relocating it somewhere else is a better and more cost-effective solution in the long run - AS LONG AS IT GETS DONE.
It has been repeated many times over, but:
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway. –Andrew Tanenbaum, 1981
xkcd did a great job covering the topic it a while back for their website...
https://what-if.xkcd.com/31/
As storage media keeps getting larger in capacity, physically lighter, and cheaper per MB, it will continue to outpace the available bandwidth of the Internet for offsite storage.
Where online backups shine, is automation. I can set up an online backup to simply happen - and I don't have to remember to do anything. Of course, that convenience comes at a cost, both in $$ and in time.
So to answer some of the original questions...
Yes, keep a local copy, and a backup locally.
Yes, keep an offsite copy - either online or physical.
If you decide to go online, compare the features, price, and reputation. Some offer versioning where it will keep multiple copies of the same file so you can go back in time to a previous version, while others do not. Some people like that ability, while others don't think they will ever need that feature.
If you have a lot of stuff to backup online, see if the service will ship you an external hard drive to "seed" the backup. Many will do it for a price, but it may be worth the $ to save multiple weeks of upload time - especially if you have a slow upload speed (remember most services push their fast download speeds in the advertisements, but they don't tell you that the upload side can be much slower).