For those of you who were slightly dissapointed with the 30D, well here is the 40D. 4.5cm LCD i think and 102 Focusing points. 
). sorry too much time on my hands.
 | Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
stijaguar Senior Member  348 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Chicago IL More info | Mar 04, 2006 18:48 | #1 For those of you who were slightly dissapointed with the 30D, well here is the 40D. 4.5cm LCD i think and 102 Focusing points.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EpHeSuS Senior Member 280 posts Joined Jul 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Mar 04, 2006 18:50 | #2 Your link is a bit broken EOS 20D | 1d Mk II | 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM | Canon 24-105 f/4L IS | Canon 135 f/2L | Sigma 100-300 f/4 EX HSM | Sigma 1.4x EX TC | Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3 DC OS | 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kaitanium Goldmember  3,967 posts Likes: 15 Joined Sep 2005 Location: San Francisco USA More info | Mar 04, 2006 19:32 | #3 too much time indeed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MiG82 Senior Member 319 posts Joined Oct 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Mar 04, 2006 19:55 | #4 With a screen that size you, I mean Canon, should stick in a TV tuner Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling in the mud with a pig. After a few hours you realise that he likes it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RubiJane Goldmember  1,827 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: Waterdown, ON More info | Mar 04, 2006 21:30 | #5 |
ACDCROCKS 321 123 33  2,931 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2005 Location: in your attic More info | Mar 05, 2006 23:04 | #6 looks kinda like a PSP with that screen. You'll need a double battery grip for that thing lol canon weight
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 05, 2006 23:09 | #7 Nice ideas there- seems to have fixed up the CF door flex problem too. I'm still disaapointed though -- its basically just an upgrade to the 30D. Viewfinder looks the same ol same old. sigh. Having a bad day? Feeling down? Bantar Gebang Attitude Enhancement Images
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 05, 2006 23:11 | #8 ..and the Canon badge and the 40D badge on the front are both backlit at night by a soft white led. Having a bad day? Feeling down? Bantar Gebang Attitude Enhancement Images
LOG IN TO REPLY |
longbeach Hatchling 1 post Joined Mar 2006 More info | Mar 05, 2006 23:12 | #9 I have a 300D and was hoping Canon would release a 10 meg to compete against Nikon's new 200D ($1,700, 10 meg). I have not gone that far down the Canon path in terms of cameras and lenses and jut may switch to Nikon b/c of the 200D. If I thought Canon would be releasing a 10 meg for $1,700 - $2,000 next year, I might wait. Any predictions on a 10 meg 40D?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ACDCROCKS 321 123 33 2,931 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2005 Location: in your attic More info | Mar 07, 2006 14:28 | #10 It's not the Megapixels it's the glass, 2 mp won't make a lage difference canon weight
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jj1987 Goldmember 1,398 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Florida More info | Mar 07, 2006 20:06 | #11 if you switch because of 2mp, be prepared to ditch nikon ever other year.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 07, 2006 22:27 | #12 The N D200 is on back order for a month here. So said the camera shop mgr yesterday. Recall of stock? Having a bad day? Feeling down? Bantar Gebang Attitude Enhancement Images
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PLB Member  149 posts Joined Jun 2005 Location: Earth More info | ACDCROCKS wrote: It's not the Megapixels it's the glass, 2 mp won't make a lage difference You are quite right. I can still take pictures with my 300D that compare against higher MP cameras. Save your money, buy glass. View my camera collection here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
basroil Cream of the Crop  8,015 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2006 Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ More info | longbeach wrote: I have a 300D and was hoping Canon would release a 10 meg to compete against Nikon's new 200D ($1,700, 10 meg). I have not gone that far down the Canon path in terms of cameras and lenses and jut may switch to Nikon b/c of the 200D. If I thought Canon would be releasing a 10 meg for $1,700 - $2,000 next year, I might wait. Any predictions on a 10 meg 40D? the 5d was canon's attack, and a good one at that. 35mm style sensor, fast shooting, and just as large and clunky as the 200. I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
peterdoomen Goldmember  1,123 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Lier, Flanders (northern, flemish speaking part of Belgium) More info | PLB wrote: Save your money, buy glass. Good one! Canon EOS 20D | Canon 70-200 f2.8L IS + Hoya UV Filter | Canon Extender 1.4x | Canon 50 f/1.8 | Canon 85 f/1.2L mk II | Tamron 17-35 f/2.8-f/4| Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 | Tokina 100 f/2.8 macro | Kenko extension tubes | Canon Speedlite 420 EX & Sto-fen Omnibounce| 80GB Flashtrax | Manfrotto Tripod 190 pro B & Joystick 322RC2 | Lowepro Micro Trekker 200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 922 guests, 115 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
