Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 12 Oct 2015 (Monday) 18:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Looking for Feedback - New Family Pic

 
EddieLee
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2015
     
Oct 12, 2015 18:32 |  #1

I've been lurking these forums for a couple of years, but never really had anything to contribute. I bought my camera in early 2013, and never had the time nor the money to use it. I spent a lot of time reading and trying to understand the basics of photography, I shoot everything in manual, as I find the ability to manipulate the photo with aperture, shutter speed and ISO to be a thrill.

We went to one of the state parks north of Dallas last a week ago to try to snap a few pics, below is one of the pictures that *I thought* turned out pretty well, but I'm a novice at best and would love to hear some feedback from those willing to provide it.

I shot this with my T3 and the Canon 85mm f1.8 from a tri-pod. I set the camera and asked my mother-in-law to push the button. I've since purchases a couple of RF603C's so that I won't be needing the assistance. ;-)a

Although there is some PP in the photo, I really don't want to rely on it, I want to learn how I can make the photo better.

Feedback is appreciated.

-Ed

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/10/2/LQ_753319.jpg
Image hosted by forum (753319) © EddieLee [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited over 8 years ago by MalVeauX.
     
Oct 12, 2015 18:49 |  #2

Heya,

Things that stand out to me:

Exposure. Under-exposed. Lighting can help with this (off camera flash behind a softbox or umbrella for fill). But I would never trade exposure of the ambient environment for exposure of the faces of subjects. When doing natural light, I suggest you slightly over-expose and set exposure based on faces with attention to highlight blowout. You can always bring exposure down a notch in post, cleanly, but raising exposure in post, is way less clean and kills color, etc. This image will print very dark unfortunately.

Composition, the two adults are composed well for the frame size, but the newborn is partially cropped. Hands and feet are important to note. I would have stepped it back, get more of baby. Plenty of resolution to crop down if needed, but you can't bring back data that isn't there.

Clothing. If you're planning a shoot like this, pay attention to clothing. It's really hard to expose some colors (white & black) and matching things up so that exposure can be consistent instead of a challenge helps. I wouldn't have worn a black shirt.

Otherwise, lovely image and setting.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EddieLee
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2015
Post edited over 8 years ago by EddieLee.
     
Oct 12, 2015 19:06 as a reply to  @ MalVeauX's post |  #3

Hi MalVeaux - Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback, it is well-noted.


Actually, now that you point out the black shirt, I definitely see your point. I guess that's what happens when I dress myself. ;) I've not been on this end of portraiture before, this is a very valuable lesson for me.

I could have absolutely positioned the camera further away, I see the value that cropping the image would have added. I think we have some images that are better, but he was either angry or wiggling like crazy. He was roughly 10 days old when this picture was taken.

As for Flash, I purchased a YN560 IV, as well as the YN560-TX and some very affordable umbrellas. While I'm just learning about light and how to use it, I've enjoyed practicing with on and off camera flash. The family however, might be getting tired of me. :) I've found some recommendations for "Speedliter's Handbook" by Syl Arena in other posts, so I've purchased a copy and am working my way through it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Oct 12, 2015 19:08 |  #4

The problem I have with them is their faces are in shadow compared to the surroundings. The eyes are dark and that takes away from an otherwise nice shot. A bit of fill flash would help next time. For now I would selectively lighten the faces in post.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EddieLee
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2015
     
Oct 12, 2015 19:57 as a reply to  @ gonzogolf's post |  #5

I can definitely see the issue with lighting. It's very apparent on my face where the source of light is coming from, perhaps some light fill from the lower left would have helped?

One issue that I was fighting was the brightness of the lake in the background. The sun was beating down on it, and trying to use the ambient by dropping my shutter would blow that portion of the background out. I need to order an hotshoe adapter from my light stand, I forgot to add it to my amazon order. :(




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Oct 12, 2015 20:19 |  #6

EddieLee wrote in post #17743049 (external link)
I can definitely see the issue with lighting. It's very apparent on my face where the source of light is coming from, perhaps some light fill from the lower left would have helped?

One issue that I was fighting was the brightness of the lake in the background. The sun was beating down on it, and trying to use the ambient by dropping my shutter would blow that portion of the background out. I need to order an hotshoe adapter from my light stand, I forgot to add it to my amazon order. :(

Fill light should almost always be near the camera axis. Dont try to make your fill be directly opposite the key light. You want to fill the shadows the camera sees.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EddieLee
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2015
     
Oct 12, 2015 22:21 as a reply to  @ gonzogolf's post |  #7

That's a great tip, thank you!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EddieLee
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2015
     
Oct 13, 2015 09:38 |  #8

So as suggested, I decided to try to lighten portions of our faces, and adjusted the shadows, there was a lot of detail that was missing from the picture. My PP skills are null, I had not used Lightroom until last week.

Better or worse? What would you do differently?

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/10/2/LQ_753435.jpg
Image hosted by forum (753435) © EddieLee [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sirquack
Goldmember
Avatar
2,599 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 937
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
Oct 13, 2015 11:44 |  #9

You did much better on the PP for the second image. You can actually see details in the shirt and brightening the faces helped tremendously.
You have a lovely family and I can see this being a regular thing going forward.
You could have also considered using a reflector to capture some of the light to bounce back into your subject. As someone else mentioned, you really want to make sure you keep an eye out for the directionality of the light. You don't want to put a reflector low and bounce light up at you guys. Then you would create shadows in ways that would not make sense to the eye. Your use of flash will help for sure, but make sure to keep the supplemental light at or higher than the axis of the lens, or you will create some weirdness that will ruin your shots.


Name is Ron.
Bodies - 6D/5D3/7D2-Gripped
Lenses - Canon 17-40 F4/24-70 F2.8 II/85 F1.8/Canon 70-200 F2.8 II/F4/Sigma 30 DC/Tamron 150-600
Website (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlakeC
"Dad was a meat cutter"
Avatar
2,673 posts
Gallery: 372 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Jul 2014
Location: West Michigan, USA
     
Oct 13, 2015 12:25 |  #10

Could the T3 name in the Exif be any longer? jeez!  :p

Nice shot! The second one does look better.


Blake C
BlakeC-Photography.com (external link)
Follow Me on Facebook (external link) , Instagram (external link), or Google+ (external link)
80D |70D | SL1 - Σ 18-35 1.8 ART, Σ 50-100 1.8 ART, Σ 17-50 2.8, Canon 24 2.8 Pancake, Canon 50 1.8 STM, Canon 10-18 STM, Canon 18-135 STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EddieLee
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2015
Post edited over 8 years ago by EddieLee.
     
Oct 13, 2015 12:36 |  #11

Thank you for the feedback, I think I'm happy with the way the second one turned out, I spent some time trying different things. It's very easy to make the photo look too edited. I really want to learn to take the shots correctly rather than making drastic changes to the photo in PP, but I can see the value in catching the moment and correcting things that you weren't able to capture when you had the opportunity. I'm sure there will be plenty of opportunities that I miss though, I'm determined to learn my equipment in manual. It's much more satisfying to me to know that I did it, versus my allowing my camera, flash, etc. to make those decisions for me.

I'm really enjoying learning, and appreciate all of the tips. I love the science, and the trial and error portion of the hobby is free excluding time which is great, and we're able to do it as a family.

The T3 Exif is really long, I was surprised last night when I uploaded the first picture. I've never heard of an EOS Kiss X50.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,967 views & 2 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Looking for Feedback - New Family Pic
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1245 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.