Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 20 Oct 2015 (Tuesday) 07:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Isle of Skye - Processing Revisted

 
WildernessTracker
Member
Avatar
98 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Mar 2015
Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland
     
Oct 20, 2015 07:12 |  #1

After going on a mad spree and over saturating some of the images lately I went back and revisited a few of the shots and toned down my processing. Any comments on processing or on the composition/exposure of the photos would be appreciated.

The first one is of reflections of Beinn Na Caillich on the Isle of Skye, it is much less saturated than what I had before, unfortunately it was around midday when I took this shot but I liked the reflections in the water as we drove by.

The second if from a series of small waterfalls known as the Fairy Pools. Initially I had dodged and burned the hills in the background but decided it was too much. This is one of my favourites from the trip so far, however I am unsure if it is a little underexposed.

The third is another water shot luckily there was a little bit of colour which I managed to bring out a bit more. I may tone back the clouds a bit on this one.

The water shots were done with a Hoya 6 stop ND filter and a Circular Polariser.

IMAGE: https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5631/22089495758_d645496ebd_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/zDYr​v9  (external link) Beinn na Caillich Reflections (external link) by Andy McDonald (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5781/22245822335_5d92ce5cb4_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/zTMD​WX  (external link) Fairy Pools - Wide Waterfall and Rocks (external link) by Andy McDonald (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/633/22058967709_60b1495bd7_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/zBgY​zt  (external link) Fairy Pools - Upper Waterfall (external link) by Andy McDonald (external link), on Flickr

flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)
My Gear: Canon 70D, 400D | Canon EF-S 18-135 IS STM, 18-55, 55-250 IS, 50/1.8 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 | Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Macro |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mamaof2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,361 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 95
Joined May 2014
     
Oct 20, 2015 07:34 |  #2

Really like #2


Jessi
T4i/Nifty fifty/ 18-55/ DCR 250 macro attachment/ 55-250 stm/ Few old film lenses
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nighthawk82
Member
138 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2014
Location: Malta
     
Oct 21, 2015 01:11 |  #3

Yep, #2 is awesome. Well done!


Dennis
Canon 5D Mark IV | Canon EOS 70D | Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM | Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM | Tamron SP 15-30 f/2.8 Di VC USD

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13370
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Oct 21, 2015 01:13 |  #4

Superb, really great stuff.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Fitness ­ Freak
Senior Member
Avatar
848 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 88
Joined Nov 2011
Location: USA
     
Oct 21, 2015 18:29 |  #5

I third the second shot!


FYI: "Fitness Freak" is also known as "Amber" outside of POTN.
http://fineartamerica.​com/profiles/1-amber-kresge.html (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Oct 21, 2015 21:37 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

Don't think I ever saw your oversaturated ones, but since in these ones you're at the sweet spot both in terms of saturation and contrast, they probably didn't look too good. These ones are superb. #1 is my favourite.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WildernessTracker
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
98 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Mar 2015
Location: Aberdeenshire, Scotland
     
Oct 22, 2015 03:56 |  #7

Thanks all, I guess #2 will be getting printed out for the wall. :)

Alveric wrote in post #17755265 (external link)
Don't think I ever saw your oversaturated ones, but since in these ones you're at the sweet spot both in terms of saturation and contrast, they probably didn't look too good. These ones are superb. #1 is my favourite.

The first one was initially too saturated after looking at it again and I just replaced it on Flickr with the one above. I need to work on the other photos from this trip and tone them back.

The only thing I was thinking of doing to the waterfall shots was toning back the clouds a little bit and removing some of the contrast in them. But I am not sure yet.


flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)
My Gear: Canon 70D, 400D | Canon EF-S 18-135 IS STM, 18-55, 55-250 IS, 50/1.8 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 | Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Macro |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Oct 22, 2015 12:45 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

I'd just leave them as they are: no local adjustments. Then again, I'm a bit of a purist.

Besides, having good contrast is a plus for B&W conversions if you're into that. :)


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NinjaKix
Member
Avatar
137 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 81
Joined Mar 2012
     
Oct 28, 2015 04:35 |  #9

I like 1 and 2 a lot. In 3 it looks like you backed off on the shadows a bit too much for my taste.


[Nikon D810] [Nikon 24-70 f/2.8] [Nikon 70-200 f/2.8] [Nikon 85 f/1.4] [Einstein E640's]
Like me on Instagram (external link)
See my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,038 views & 4 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Isle of Skye - Processing Revisted
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1217 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.