Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 20 Oct 2015 (Tuesday) 15:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How bad is it for the lens if your lens cap comes off inside bag?

 
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 8 years ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Oct 23, 2015 12:02 |  #106

Most of the marks I have seen on glass seem to have come from filters on other lenses, due to the serrated nature of the marks. As much as a I am filter person, I wonder how many lenses have been damaged by placing a camera and other lens with a filter down into a bag across the uncovered glass of a different lens? Kinda like a self-fulfilling prophecy... :D

"I use a filter on my lens to protect it, but I damaged my other lens with said filter!"


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Xyclopx
Goldmember
1,714 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 202
Joined Jul 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Oct 23, 2015 12:11 |  #107

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17757328 (external link)
Most of the marks I have seen on glass seem to have come from filters on other lenses, due to the serrated nature of the marks. As much as a I am filter person, I wonder how many lenses have been damaged by placing a camera and other lens with a filter down into a bag across the uncovered glass of a different lens? Kinda like a self-fulfilling prophecy... :D

"I use a filter on my lens to protect it, but I damaged my other lens with said filter!"

that's an interesting observation. ......... could it be that they come from changing filters often?

for me, when i am changing filters, it's almost always in less than ideal conditions--like i'm shooting landscapes and i go, oh i should use a polarizer! or i'm rushing to use the polarizer while at a car show, and am changing filters in the corner of the floor. ..........it's really easy to screw up and touch the filter to the lens. to make the serrations though i guess you'd have to do it backwards, which i've never done. but, i dunno, if you're stressed i can see people making that mistake.

i dunno, just one theory. :-)


Dean Chiang (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear (external link)
My Photos (external link)
Instagram @xyclopx (external link) @feetandeyes (external link) @gastramour (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 8 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Oct 23, 2015 12:13 as a reply to  @ Xyclopx's post |  #108

Not sure, but I have purchased alot of used lenses over the years, and invariably if I see scratches, they are not random scratches, but rather a couple of series of matching side by side scratches that seem like they could have lined up with a brass filter ring. Changing lenses could be the cause as well, if they weren't careful, or applied too much pressure as they tried to screw on the filter, and they slipped the filter across the lens face. That would be a good definition of irony, wouldn't it? :D


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,504 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50961
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Oct 23, 2015 12:27 |  #109

Xyclopx wrote in post #17757323 (external link)
FINALLY, one note that i guess should be pondered: My filters DO have scratches. And I STILL use them on the same lenses they saved. One even has a pit in it, right smack in the middle--that one is on my 50 1.2. Never replaced one yet. So, that says something in itself, for both camps. ;-)a

Yes, you should be more careful! ;-)a I don't use filters, and my lenses are scratch- and dirt-free after 10,000's of pictures.

Could it be that filters give a sense of security emboldening some users to be rougher with their gear?


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Oct 23, 2015 12:28 as a reply to  @ Archibald's post |  #110

Could be part of it... I know I am a bit more daring on what I shoot knowing I have a filter. However I am still careful putting on the lens cap, and putting away my equipment so for myself, I don't know.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Xyclopx
Goldmember
1,714 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 202
Joined Jul 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Post edited over 8 years ago by Xyclopx.
     
Oct 23, 2015 12:39 |  #111

Archibald wrote in post #17757361 (external link)
Yes, you should be more careful! ;-)a I don't use filters, and my lenses are scratch- and dirt-free after 10,000's of pictures.

Could it be that filters give a sense of security emboldening some users to be rougher with their gear?

that certainly is true for me.

if i know my lens is bare, and there are times where that happens like i took off a ND but don't have time to fiddle with stuff, i definitely am more careful with it. HOWEVER, that to me is a great thing. babying your gear is a sure way to lose shots. if a filter gets you to go crazy, it's priceless.

btw archibald, i am willing to bet you do have scratches and dirt. a big $$$ bet. .... i've purchased lenses from people who said in their descriptions that they are immaculate. and many have fine scratches, at least in the coating, if they did not use a filter. ALL lenses have dirt if they have had any use at all. just take a flashlight and shine it on the glass at an angle. it's gonna freak you out how much dirt there is, and the occasional scratch. i btw never do this if i don't have to, because it does freak me out too. and i use filters 99.99% of the time.

i'm just gonna put a number out there--that 20% of people who say the don't use filters and have no scratches are actually plain wrong, but never realized it.


Dean Chiang (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Blog (external link) | Gear (external link)
My Photos (external link)
Instagram @xyclopx (external link) @feetandeyes (external link) @gastramour (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,116 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 152
Joined Nov 2012
     
Oct 23, 2015 12:45 |  #112

That video definitely shows that the filter can't hold up the same way a front element does. But ad the author of the video stated, its far from scientific. While sometimes a force with that small and hard of an impact point is possible, it's not very normal in my assumption. In every day use with care of ones equipment, Im in the camp that a filter helps, unless of course you are going to run onto a bolt head on.


_______________
“It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” - Walt Disney.
Equipment: Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 40mm 2.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8 XR Di, Canon 18-55mm, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 70-300VC / T3I and 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,504 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 50961
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Oct 23, 2015 12:56 |  #113

Xyclopx wrote in post #17757373 (external link)
that certainly is true for me.

if i know my lens is bare, and there are times where that happens like i took off a ND but don't have time to fiddle with stuff, i definitely am more careful with it. HOWEVER, that to me is a great thing. babying your gear is a sure way to lose shots. if a filter gets you to go crazy, it's priceless.

btw archibald, i am willing to bet you do have scratches and dirt. a big $$$ bet. .... i've purchased lenses from people who said in their descriptions that they are immaculate. and many have fine scratches, at least in the coating, if they did not use a filter. ALL lenses have dirt if they have had any use at all. just take a flashlight and shine it on the glass at an angle. it's gonna freak you out how much dirt there is, and the occasional scratch. i btw never do this if i don't have to, because it does freak me out too. and i use filters 99.99% of the time.

i'm just gonna put a number out there--that 20% of people who say the don't use filters and have no scratches are actually plain wrong, but never realized it.

I don't see how there could be scratches on my lenses. I almost never clean them because they practically never get dirty. My 100-400 II is 10 months old, has taken ~10,000 pics, and is spotless. OK, a couple tiny specks of dust. I don't think I have ever cleaned it.

Anyway, a scratch that nobody can see is not a scratch.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mpix345
Goldmember
2,870 posts
Likes: 69
Joined Dec 2006
     
Oct 23, 2015 18:20 |  #114

mcoren wrote in post #17755961 (external link)
Have you tried amateur astronomy?

nope; afraid of the dark...:-P


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mpix345
Goldmember
2,870 posts
Likes: 69
Joined Dec 2006
     
Oct 23, 2015 18:39 |  #115

Frodge wrote in post #17757376 (external link)
That video definitely shows that the filter can't hold up the same way a front element does. But ad the author of the video stated, its far from scientific. While sometimes a force with that small and hard of an impact point is possible, it's not very normal in my assumption. In every day use with care of ones equipment, Im in the camp that a filter helps, unless of course you are going to run onto a bolt head on.

Congrats. You moved the thread from off topic about audio to off topic about filters. Really glad, 'cause that discussion is new and interesting.

Fact is when the thread is a bit silly, not naming any threads now, it is more likely to take the odd turn or two. No reason to hand out warnings.

On the plus side, this has opened my eyes to the issue of lens caps popping off in bag. I've tossed two lenses this week that experienced that unfortunate occurrence. I'm not buying expensive filters that half of you say I don't need, and I'm not going to obsess about if my lens has a scratch, so out it goes!


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,116 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 152
Joined Nov 2012
     
Oct 23, 2015 18:45 as a reply to  @ mpix345's post |  #116

I didn't move it off topic about filters. Someone pur a link to a video about filters and how fragile they may be. Go back and reread. I'm only responding to precious posters.


_______________
“It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” - Walt Disney.
Equipment: Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 40mm 2.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8 XR Di, Canon 18-55mm, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 70-300VC / T3I and 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
absplastic
Goldmember
Avatar
1,643 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 541
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
Post edited over 8 years ago by absplastic.
     
Oct 23, 2015 18:46 |  #117

I keep the lens caps on my lenses all the time. I've never gotten a single scratch on any lens, and the only downside has been that my photos are all really underexposed. But I can fix that in LR**.

**Probably, I haven't tried. I mostly just talk about photography, not do it.


5DSR, 6D, 16-35/4L IS, 85L II, 100L macro, Sigma 150-600C
SL1, 10-18 STM, 18-55 STM, 40 STM, 50 STM
My (mostly) Fashion and Portraiture Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link) (NSFW)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2610
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Oct 23, 2015 18:50 |  #118

absplastic wrote in post #17757755 (external link)
I keep the lens caps on my lenses all the time. ...and the only downside has been that my photos are all really underexposed.

You need to take the cap off before you take the shot! ; D


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
absplastic
Goldmember
Avatar
1,643 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 541
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Oct 23, 2015 18:54 |  #119

PhotosGuy wrote in post #17757758 (external link)
You need to take the cap off before you take the shot! ; D

You can do whatever you want with your gear, but I invested too much in lenses to take that risk. I prefer to crank up the ISO, use really powerful strobes, and just shoot through the cap.


5DSR, 6D, 16-35/4L IS, 85L II, 100L macro, Sigma 150-600C
SL1, 10-18 STM, 18-55 STM, 40 STM, 50 STM
My (mostly) Fashion and Portraiture Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link) (NSFW)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,909 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited over 8 years ago by CyberDyneSystems.
     
Oct 23, 2015 19:03 |  #120

Archibald wrote in post #17754740 (external link)
Wow, .... Monster cables :-D

Pfft, meh,.. It's Tara, Kimber or AudioQuest. Monster is Mainstream Tiffen garbage :) ;)

Now B&W however does make some good speakers :)


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

15,630 views & 34 likes for this thread, 30 members have posted to it and it is followed by 14 members.
How bad is it for the lens if your lens cap comes off inside bag?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1100 guests, 152 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.