Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 25 Oct 2015 (Sunday) 23:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is there a tiny hot-shoe flash available?

 
NBEast
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
Oct 25, 2015 23:04 |  #1

Is there a small low-profile hot-shoe flash that can essentially mimic a pop-up in size, power, and automation?

I realized that's the only reason I even keep the 7D - for the pop-up. I'd much prefer to just use the 5Dii for everything.

This weekend was a perfect example. I attended my nephew's wedding but, as a guest, it would just be weird for me to mount even a 430EX on my 5Dii. ... even if I were inclined to lug it around, which I'm not. So I brought the noisy 7D instead.


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited over 8 years ago by MalVeauX.
     
Oct 25, 2015 23:08 |  #2

NBEast wrote in post #17760260 (external link)
Is there a small low-profile hot-shoe flash that can essentially mimic a pop-up in size, power, and automation?

I realized that's the only reason I even keep the 7D - for the pop-up. I'd much prefer to just use the 5Dii for everything.

This weekend was a perfect example. I attended my nephew's wedding but, as a guest, it would just be weird for me to mount even a 430EX on my 5Dii. ... even if I were inclined to lug it around, which I'm not. So I brought the noisy 7D instead.

Heya,

Yeap. Take a look at the Canon 90EX ($40 used), which is basically the equivalent of a pop-up flash (meant for the EOS-M, but should work on basically any Canon hot shoe). Note it is not that powerful, a bit weaker than the pop-up flash on your 7D actually. But it's a cheap way to get a quick small flash as you asked.

Also look at the Canon 270EXII. A bit larger, much more powerful, swivel, still great, around $170 new, $140 used or so? Much more powerful, titling head, all that. Without the big flash body. Still small enough to not be crazy looking, yet powerful enough to actually matter.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NBEast
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
Post edited over 8 years ago by NBEast.
     
Oct 25, 2015 23:28 as a reply to  @ MalVeauX's post |  #3

Thanks. It sounds suitable but if it were even smaller (thinner & less intimidating to the subject) and if it used the camera's battery it would be even better.

I usually use manual or AV exposure mode, crank up the ISO, and use the pop-up flash (manually reduced to near minimum) to fill the shadows and add some pop.

Anyone know if a 3rd party essentially mimics the Pop-up? So; no battery and small footprint?


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,913 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14872
Joined Dec 2006
Post edited over 8 years ago by gonzogolf.
     
Oct 25, 2015 23:34 |  #4

NBEast wrote in post #17760298 (external link)
Thanks. It sounds suitable but if it were even smaller (thinner & less intimidating to the subject) and if it used the camera's battery it would be even better.

I usually use manual or AV exposure mode, crank up the ISO, and use the pop-up flash (manually reduced to near minimum) to fill the shadows and add some pop.

Anyone know if a 3rd party essentially mimics the Pop-up? So; no battery and small footprint?

No. The flash cannot draw power from the camera, the circuitry isn't there for that. The two models memtioned above are really the two options with the 270II being the better because you have some bounce capanilty. Using the popup is a recipe for bad photos so it would help to rethink and get yourself a capable flash like a 430exII.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Oct 25, 2015 23:40 |  #5

NBEast wrote in post #17760298 (external link)
Thanks. It sounds suitable but if it were even smaller (thinner & less intimidating to the subject) and if it used the camera's battery it would be even better.

I usually use manual or AV exposure mode, crank up the ISO, and use the pop-up flash (manually reduced to near minimum) to fill the shadows and add some pop.

Anyone know if a 3rd party essentially mimics the Pop-up? So; no battery and small footprint?

I don't think you're going to get a third party, nor Canon, that uses the camera's battery. Everything will have to seat in the hot shoe and require batteries.

Example of sizes (not my photos, so linking):

90EX on 5D body (external link)
270EX II on 5D body (external link)

The 90EX is truly tiny. But the 270EX II has enough power, and can be used for bounce with ETTL, making it the far, far better flash.

If you need smaller, you might as well learn to live without flash, or get a modern APS-C with pop-up flash, like a 70D, that has similar ISO noise as the 5D2.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10102
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Oct 26, 2015 00:00 |  #6

270 is the way to go here. tiny, not really much larger than the 90, but a lot better.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NBEast
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
Post edited over 8 years ago by NBEast. (2 edits in all)
     
Oct 26, 2015 01:17 |  #7

Thanks, very helpful. Good to know the wiring's not there for tapping into the camera's battery so I can stop looking.

They look similar in size so I agree the 270II, with it's bouncing capability and probably other improvements, is the way to go.

Gonzogolf: I have a few flashes (mix of 430EX, 580EX, and 2 580EXii) but they're too much when I want to stay on the down-low. The 7D has internal flash settings that allows it to be used for catchlight and lifting shadows a bit. For very dark settings, I agree it's an uglifier.

If the 5Dii had a pop-up I'd have trashed my 7D years ago. Nikon gets it, sigh. But Canon has other advantages so I'll try this wanna-popup.


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Oct 26, 2015 02:46 |  #8

How about A RING LIGHT (external link)? It's mostly used for macro but I've seen them used very effectively for portraits and other fill uses. It's not very powerful though.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qlayer2
OOOHHH! Pretty Moth!
Avatar
941 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 122
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Oct 26, 2015 09:25 |  #9

Take a look at the Meike/Neewer 320 series. It was a nice little flash when I used it on the Fuji- they have Canon models as well. Ettl or manual power, tilts, GN around 32 if I remember correctly.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tommydigi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,916 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 844
Joined May 2010
Location: Chicago
     
Oct 26, 2015 10:00 |  #10

The 270 is my suggestion. I never travel without it and it works well.


Website (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)
Fuji X100F • Canon EOS R6 Mark 2 • G7XII • RF 16 2.8 • RF 14-35 F4 L • RF 35 1.8 • RF 800 F11 • EF 24LII L • EF 50 L • EF 100 L • EF 135 L • EF 100-400 L II • 600EX II RT • 270 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NBEast
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
Oct 26, 2015 20:12 |  #11

I'm reading some reviews and the recurring complaint is slow recycle time (up to 15 seconds).

I'm used to the Canon pop-up or 580EXii that are both usually about 1 or 2 seconds on a fresh battery.

Anyone know if it's much faster if I crank up the ISO so it doesn't need as much juice? You'd think so, but it would be nice if someone actually knows.


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,913 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14872
Joined Dec 2006
     
Oct 26, 2015 20:20 |  #12

NBEast wrote in post #17761420 (external link)
I'm reading some reviews and the recurring complaint is slow recycle time (up to 15 seconds).

I'm used to the Canon pop-up or 580EXii that are both usually about 1 or 2 seconds on a fresh battery.

Anyone know if it's much faster if I crank up the ISO so it doesn't need as much juice? You'd think so, but it would be nice if someone actually knows.

Stands to reason that less power out means quicker recycle times. Usually the reviews cite recyle times from full, power with fresh batteries. But its not going to recycle as fast as a 580exII with only half the batteries.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NBEast
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
Oct 27, 2015 22:33 |  #13

gonzogolf wrote in post #17761427 (external link)
Stands to reason that less power out means quicker recycle times. Usually the reviews cite recyle times from full, power with fresh batteries. But its not going to recycle as fast as a 580exII with only half the batteries.

Thanks. Ordered one yesterday. Guess I'll see for myself.


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MFGorilla
Member
Avatar
37 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Boston, MA
     
Oct 29, 2015 06:46 |  #14

I got a used 220ex for when I don't want to lug around my 580ex ii. Better recycle times and better AF assist than the 270, and it rocks for daylight fill flash.


Canon T3i, Elan 7 | Canon 28-105 II, 50 1.4 | SIGMA 17-50 | Random brand 70-300
Canon 580EX II, 220EX, 540EZ | YONGNUO YN-560IV x2, YN560-TX, RF-605 x2
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NBEast
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
Oct 29, 2015 19:39 |  #15

Recycle is fine. At ISO 800 in pretty dim indoors, the charge lasted for 3 rapid flashes then needed to recharge. Works for me!

One thing: The used one I got is loose (can be wiggled) when locked in. It seems to work fine, but I'm wondering if it might be a problem down the line. Its a hassle to return it but the reseller offered 30 days satisfaction guarantee (Amazon).

Anyone else have a wiggle?


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,768 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Is there a tiny hot-shoe flash available?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
758 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.