I wanted to see some wedding photos without any kind of flash or strobe. Please post your photos and give a short summary of how you achieved the look.
cleyvosier Senior Member 848 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2011 Location: Abilene,Texas More info | Oct 26, 2015 22:57 | #1 I wanted to see some wedding photos without any kind of flash or strobe. Please post your photos and give a short summary of how you achieved the look. Gear- Canon 50d, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM,Alien Bee 1600 & csr+ reciever, Sekonik L-358
LOG IN TO REPLY |
memoriesoftomorrow Goldmember 3,846 posts Likes: 293 Joined Nov 2010 More info | Oct 26, 2015 23:16 | #2 Pretty much everything on my Facebook page (excluding some of the photos at the receptions). Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jcolman Goldmember More info | Oct 27, 2015 08:45 | #3 Just find some pretty and/or interesting light and background. IMAGE LINK: http://s182.photobucket.com …-614_zps635f78ec.jpg.htmlWindow lightIMAGE LINK: http://s182.photobucket.com …ects/wedding-225.jpg.html
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 27, 2015 13:44 | #4 Agree with above poster, just find the right light. Image hosted by forum (756171) © elrey2375 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. http://emjfotografi.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 27, 2015 17:27 | #5 you are going to need artificial light at some point during a wedding. I prefer to work without it but if the reception is indoors, its required. Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jcolman Goldmember More info | Oct 27, 2015 22:15 | #6 mike_311 wrote in post #17762524 you are going to need artificial light at some point during a wedding. I prefer to work without it but if the reception is indoors, its required. This is very true. I have seen some horrible results from the "natural light" photographers who attempt to shoot a reception with only available light.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
i rarely use artificial for the formals and bridge groom session unless i really need some fill. lights are just a hassle to work with when you are pressed for time. Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ammo Member 208 posts Likes: 28 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Cornwall, UK. More info | Oct 29, 2015 01:31 | #8 Rarely ever use flash for anything at a wedding other than dancing in the evening! Check me out
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JonTinkler Member 103 posts Likes: 31 Joined Feb 2015 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Oct 29, 2015 19:46 | #9 As others have said, find the even or interesting light, or not - depending on what you have going for you. Sometimes you can't pick and choose, sometimes you need to use a load of fill flash on a really bright day to not have everything blown out. Image hosted by forum (756628) © Jon Tinkler [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Millgrove Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Biker5005 Mostly Lurking 17 posts Likes: 5 Joined Sep 2015 More info | Oct 30, 2015 06:09 | #10 Hi,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jimeuph1 Member 215 posts Likes: 25 Joined Jul 2014 More info | Oct 31, 2015 04:25 | #11 It depends the venue and the quality of the DJ lights.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ColinGlover Goldmember 1,376 posts Gallery: 17 photos Likes: 133 Joined Aug 2012 Location: Southport nr Liverpool United Kingdom More info | Oct 31, 2015 08:37 | #12 Difficult to say without seeing a venue. One church I've shot twice will let you shoot flash but not during the vows. You need to understand also that light changes during the course of a service. My last gig was a great example. Bride arrived in overcast skies and rain, and left in bright sunlight so much that as I was in hs burst as they walked down the aisle the first couple of shots as they exited the church were awfully overexposed. And clouds passing by can quickly change your light in seconds.And even the smallest amount of flash can sometimes be too much. And keep your exposure in the middle so you know it'll be there or thereabouts. Canon EOS 70D, Canon EOS 600D, EF-S 18-55 ii, EF 55-200 USM ii, EF-S 75-300 iii, Tamron 28-80, Sigma 70-210. Pentax 50mm, Pentax 135mm, EF-S 55-250, Raynox Macro adapter, Neewer filters (CPL, UV, FLD & ND4), Fuji HS20 EXR (30X zoom ) & cable release, Yongnuo 560 iii & Luxon 9800A manual flashguns for the Fuji, Hama Star 63 tripod, Hongdek RC-6 remote control, Velbon DF 40 www.point-n-shoot.co.uk website.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
memoriesoftomorrow Goldmember 3,846 posts Likes: 293 Joined Nov 2010 More info | Oct 31, 2015 08:51 | #13 Colin Glover wrote in post #17766713 If anyone has any more tips, please share here. Use a camera with an EVF and getting exposures right is a walk in the park. Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ColinGlover Goldmember 1,376 posts Gallery: 17 photos Likes: 133 Joined Aug 2012 Location: Southport nr Liverpool United Kingdom More info | Oct 31, 2015 19:21 | #14 Why is that? My personal experience of evf has been of a darker picture on the evf with considerable lag. Canon EOS 70D, Canon EOS 600D, EF-S 18-55 ii, EF 55-200 USM ii, EF-S 75-300 iii, Tamron 28-80, Sigma 70-210. Pentax 50mm, Pentax 135mm, EF-S 55-250, Raynox Macro adapter, Neewer filters (CPL, UV, FLD & ND4), Fuji HS20 EXR (30X zoom ) & cable release, Yongnuo 560 iii & Luxon 9800A manual flashguns for the Fuji, Hama Star 63 tripod, Hongdek RC-6 remote control, Velbon DF 40 www.point-n-shoot.co.uk website.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
memoriesoftomorrow Goldmember 3,846 posts Likes: 293 Joined Nov 2010 More info | What you see is what you get. Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1595 guests, 124 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||