I'd like to expand on this post a bit. While I assume that the intent of the original question was to see some shots taken without any artificial light, I strongly believe that going "au natural" is the exception rather than the norm if one wants to create images that are more than simply "documenting the wedding".
Here are some examples.
B&G intro. Three lights set up to insure that I was able to cover the stairs and dance floor. You never know where the subject will be for the defining shot.
First dance. I turned off (remotely) all lights but one.IMAGE LINK: http://s182.photobucket.com …-725_zps56d84f7c.jpg.html
Looks like natural light right? I added a light firing thru an umbrella camera leftIMAGE LINK: http://s182.photobucket.com …-655_zps61cf81a7.jpg.html
Two lights used. No way was I going to capture this shot with only using available lightIMAGE LINK: http://s182.photobucket.com …-873_zpsf256a61d.jpg.html
Same with this photo. One light used.IMAGE LINK: http://s182.photobucket.com …1086_zps42378db2.jpg.html
But this one is all natural light. IMAGE LINK: http://s182.photobucket.com …-544_zps6572740f.jpg.html
Bottom line, photography is all about light. Without good light you got nothing. Spend some time (and money) leaning how to use lights and you will never have to make excuses again as to "why the photo didn't come out"











