Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 01 Nov 2015 (Sunday) 18:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6D - Weird Image Line

 
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Post edited over 8 years ago by Left Handed Brisket.
     
Nov 02, 2015 08:16 |  #16

Put me in the "fluorescent light cycling" crew.

That is a pretty dramatic example, but given that it has not happened since, and placement was erratic, it makes sense.

The museum might well have some special lighting that may help preserve the artifacts.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
Post edited over 8 years ago by Bassat.
     
Nov 02, 2015 08:27 |  #17
bannedPermanent ban

drveede76 wrote in post #17768570 (external link)
Need some help from POTN.

I was at the the museum today with the family and in two specific display cases, this issue of a line in the image kept happening. it was not consistent and was random around the image. Is this a shutter issue? Or maybe a light cycle of the display case? It seems like it is in the camera since it remained in the same orientation of the camera. It only happened on these two parts of the museum. I was shooting aperture priority at f2.8.

Thank you,
Dave

drveede76 wrote in post #17769156 (external link)
I do grip up in portrait orientation.

Not very likely to be the shutter. It is NOT in the same place for each orientation. In landscape it is at the bottom of the frame. In portrait (grip UP) it is at the top of the frame. Coincidence, probably fluorescent light flicker.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Larry ­ Weinman
Goldmember
1,438 posts
Likes: 66
Joined Jul 2006
     
Nov 02, 2015 09:19 |  #18

maverick75 wrote in post #17768791 (external link)
You can't even physically mount EF-S lenses on a Canon full frame.

You can try, I did it by accident once and knocked the mirror off. $200 repair at Canon.


7D Mark II 6D 100mm f 2.8 macro 180mm f 3.5 macro, MP-E-65 300mm f 2.8 500mm f4 Tokina 10-17mm fisheye 10-22mm 17-55mm 24-105mm 70-300mm 70-200 f 2.8 Mk II 100-400mm Mk II 1.4 TCIII 2X TCIII 580EX II 430 EX II MT 24 EX Sigma 150-600

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
Post edited over 8 years ago by Bassat.
     
Nov 02, 2015 10:03 |  #19
bannedPermanent ban

maverick75 wrote in post #17768791 (external link)
You can't even physically mount EF-S lenses on a Canon full frame.

Not entirely true. Look for threads about 10-22 on 5D Mk III. You have to remove a baffle or something, but it does work. WHY do it? is another question entirely.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drveede76
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
121 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Dec 2011
     
Nov 02, 2015 11:11 |  #20

Thanks everyone, amazing amount of knowledge on this forum.

Dave


6D, 24-70L 2.8 ii, 16-35L 2.8, 70-200L 2.8 IS ii, 24-105L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fordmondeo
I was Soupdragon in a former life.
1,254 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 384
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Sunny Southern England
     
Nov 03, 2015 00:20 |  #21

Were you using a flash of any kind?


Vaginator9000

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drveede76
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
121 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Dec 2011
     
Nov 03, 2015 14:52 as a reply to  @ fordmondeo's post |  #22

No flash, they weren't allowed.


6D, 24-70L 2.8 ii, 16-35L 2.8, 70-200L 2.8 IS ii, 24-105L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,730 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Nov 03, 2015 14:59 |  #23

I'm wondering if the lighting is not museum quality LED. That might account for the rapid cutoff.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
absplastic
Goldmember
Avatar
1,643 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 541
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Nov 06, 2015 18:21 |  #24

That's a lighting issue. Did you shoot anything at higher or lower shutter speeds, and if so, is the black band wider in the longer exposures and narrower in the shorter ones? With fluorescent lighting, there are usually alternating dark and light bands, that correspond to the mains frequency. But with dimmable LED lighting, anything is possibly, since they regulate via duty cycle, so when turned up to more than half brightness, the "off" dip in output is shorter in duration than the "on" time of the cycle.


5DSR, 6D, 16-35/4L IS, 85L II, 100L macro, Sigma 150-600C
SL1, 10-18 STM, 18-55 STM, 40 STM, 50 STM
My (mostly) Fashion and Portraiture Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link) (NSFW)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,398 views & 2 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it and it is followed by 8 members.
6D - Weird Image Line
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
811 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.