kma16 Member 76 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2015 More info | Nov 04, 2015 06:45 | #1 I'm thinking of swapping out my older version of the sigma 24-70mm D lens for the newer nikon 35mm 1.8g FX. How does the 35mm 1.8 FX lens perform? Or is it more worth it to spend the money on the 35 1.4?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer  51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Nov 04, 2015 13:04 | #2 I wouldn't be without a 24-70 for weddings, that's the bread and butter lens. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Honestly I've had it for a while and i dont love it. It is the older model d series bit i dont find it very sharp so looking at getting the 35 ...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smythie I wasn't even trying More info Post edited over 8 years ago by smythie. | Nov 05, 2015 02:41 | #4 A lower cost option (vs the Art) might be the old 28-70/2.8. It still has a very good reputation.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 09, 2015 10:48 | #5 Either of those newer primes is going to be much, much sharper than the mediocre at best zoom you have now.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1230 guests, 147 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
