Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 05 Mar 2006 (Sunday) 14:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

dead pixel? :(

 
CorruptedPhotographer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,802 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2005
Location: AbuDhabi, United Arab Emirates
     
Mar 05, 2006 14:49 |  #1

Today I noticed that most of my photos from today evening have this red pixel on t he top left hand corner. Does I have a dead pixel on my sensor?
:( :( :( :(

If so, what do I do? How does it affect me??????/ :cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry::cry:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


Its very vague here because I resized the image to upload to imageshack.us , so ill attach 100% crop of the damn hot pixel.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

Gear List
Member since 2005 ^_^

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
karusel
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Location: Location:
     
Mar 05, 2006 14:57 |  #2

You only have one?

When you think about it, it's close to a miracle to have every one of those 8 million photosites working flawlessly. RAW converter makes them disappear for me, I've got 2, I think.


5D and holy trinity of primes. Now the 90mm TS-E TS-E fly bit me. I hate these forums.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RWK
Member
212 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 31
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Alaska
     
Mar 05, 2006 15:02 as a reply to  @ karusel's post |  #3

Does it show up in all your pics? That spot seems to line up with the light glare, wonder if there was something floating around in the air? Airplane light in the sky?


Rebel T4i 18-55 IS Kit Lens :cool:
Rebel XT Kit Lens
EF-S 17-85
EF 50 1.8
EF 70-300
EF-S 18-135 STM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOSAddict
Book Committee Immortal
Avatar
6,091 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Preston, Lancashire, England
     
Mar 05, 2006 15:11 |  #4

I see you had a 4 sec exposure. Do a lens cap on 30 sec exposure and I bet you will see MANY hot pixels. Remeber noise accumulates over time. You will not see it on shorter exposures. At least when you know where they are you can PS them out on the relevant images. I have at least a dozen that appear over about 5 sec


Al
My Gear, My Website: www.endofthetrailphoto​graphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Mar 05, 2006 15:45 |  #5

Do you have Long Exposure Noise Reduction enabled? If not, try it. That's just the situation it's meant for. Sensors tend to get hot (causing random noise) as they're exposed longer. Thus, hot spots.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
misolimo
Member
Avatar
32 posts
Joined Feb 2006
     
Mar 05, 2006 15:58 as a reply to  @ EOSAddict's post |  #6

EOSAddict wrote:
I see you had a 4 sec exposure. Do a lens cap on 30 sec exposure and I bet you will see MANY hot pixels. Remeber noise accumulates over time. You will not see it on shorter exposures. At least when you know where they are you can PS them out on the relevant images. I have at least a dozen that appear over about 5 sec

WOW! you mean you are able to know what exposure just by looking at the photos? That's GOOD!
Okie back to my question: What do you mean by "Do a lens cap on"?


BODY : IXUS V2
Rebel XT / 350D
LENSES: EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 II
EF 50mm f/1.8 II...... Coming real soon! ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOSAddict
Book Committee Immortal
Avatar
6,091 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Preston, Lancashire, England
     
Mar 05, 2006 16:13 |  #7

I meant take a pic of something completely dark so that it highlights the hot pixels, no background to distract. OP courteously left his EXIF data in the posted image, ;)


Al
My Gear, My Website: www.endofthetrailphoto​graphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Specialhawk
Member
239 posts
Joined Feb 2006
     
Mar 05, 2006 20:11 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

WOW! you mean you are able to know what exposure just by looking at the photos? That's GOOD!

That data is embeded in the photo its self...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CorruptedPhotographer
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,802 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2005
Location: AbuDhabi, United Arab Emirates
     
Mar 06, 2006 14:25 |  #9

RWK, nope, same spot in all images from that night. More obvious on some because of darker background (such as sky).

Does the warranty cover such dead pixels??

thanks for the input everyone.

On a side note, what do you thikn about the shot? Taken with the 35 L. Bought it a while ago but never got a chance to really play with it. The image is a JPG straight out the camera, no in-camera sharpening, nor PP.


Gear List
Member since 2005 ^_^

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOSAddict
Book Committee Immortal
Avatar
6,091 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Preston, Lancashire, England
     
Mar 06, 2006 14:33 |  #10

Corrupted, its not dead, its resting (actually its hot) and I doubt the warranty covers it unless its the same at ISO 100 1/4000th ;)


Al
My Gear, My Website: www.endofthetrailphoto​graphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
karusel
Goldmember
Avatar
1,452 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Location: Location:
     
Mar 07, 2006 05:22 |  #11

I think up to 5 dead (hot) pixels are allowed, above that you may claim a replacement.

Like I said, try shooting RAW.


5D and holy trinity of primes. Now the 90mm TS-E TS-E fly bit me. I hate these forums.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CorruptedPhotographer
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,802 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2005
Location: AbuDhabi, United Arab Emirates
     
Mar 07, 2006 14:50 |  #12

thanks for the input guys.


Gear List
Member since 2005 ^_^

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JBF
Goldmember
Avatar
1,492 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Lexington, KY
     
Mar 07, 2006 14:58 |  #13

Actually I think the acceptable amount is .01 of total pixels. So on a camera with 8 million pixels up to 80 hot pixels is ok. And usually that many would only show up with a 10 sec exp or longer at ISO's of 800-1600.


JBF
Canon 7D, Canon 1D Mark IV, Canon 24-105L f/4, Canon 35L 1.4, Canon 200L f/2.8, Canon 70-200L II IS f/2.8, Canon 300L f/2.8IS, 580ex Flash, 430ex Flash, 1.4X Converter. Bunch of other crap! I want the new 500mmL and the 200L f/2.0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brian ­ Puccio
Senior Member
254 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Metro NY
     
Mar 07, 2006 17:32 as a reply to  @ JBF's post |  #14

You should be able to set up your post-processing software to interpolate around your hot/dead pixels. For instance, if you used dcraw (external link), you could use a .badpixels (external link) file. I'm sure whatever software you use has these settings some place as well, probably not stored in a text file configuration.


All images, unless otherwise noted, are released under the Creative Commons License (external link) so you are welcome to modify any images

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CorruptedPhotographer
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,802 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2005
Location: AbuDhabi, United Arab Emirates
     
Mar 08, 2006 14:33 |  #15

I use RawShooterEssentials mainly for raw files.

Does that do it or some sort of similar function?

I seem illiterate in regards to Software only because I fall under the category of photographers that like to use thier best knowledge to take the best images and use s/w for other common uses.


Gear List
Member since 2005 ^_^

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,279 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
dead pixel? :(
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1364 guests, 175 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.