Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 12 Nov 2015 (Thursday) 17:01
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Do you use a watermark"
Yes
13
68.4%
No
6
31.6%
Depends
0
0%

19 voters, 19 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Do you use watermark

 
gmm213
I know some really nice clowns
Avatar
783 posts
Likes: 169
Joined Apr 2013
Location: Portsmouth Va
Post edited over 8 years ago by gmm213.
     
Nov 12, 2015 17:01 |  #1

I see a lot of threads on creating watermarks, but I was wondering how many people use them and why? Ive never used one simply do to that fact I see it as fruitless. Someone can edit out a watermark pretty easily now a days.

I put depends because a friend does it sometimes. Hes to the point where hes getting paid jobs and clients, but still does free work for friends family and his portfolio. On all his paid stuff he doesnt watermark but on his free stuff he does. Not that hes worried about it getting stolen and sold but because he considers it free advertising.


500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
Mayhem # 3789333 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 12, 2015 17:15 |  #2

From memory, according to USA copyright laws if someone actively removes a watermark it hugely increases their financial penalty. It also makes stealing the photo a bit more difficult.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Larry ­ Johnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,398 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 488
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Virginia
     
Nov 12, 2015 17:33 |  #3

I always put a watermark on images that I post to flickr. Some watermarks are inconspicuous. It just makes me feel a little more "safe". I also try to only post small sized images that will become grainy if someone tries to enlarge.

I no longer post images to POTN because some people here have no respect and will download, edit, and repost your image even though you don't give them permission to do so. Sad.


_______________
Ain't Nature Grand!
Shooting 7D2 with Canon 400mm, f/5.6.
60D, canon 18-135 EFS, and 1.4 extender in the bag.
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AceCo55
Senior Member
Avatar
267 posts
Likes: 65
Joined Mar 2014
Location: South Australia
     
Nov 13, 2015 04:08 |  #4

I shoot local sports and I place a watermark slap bang, dead centre of every photo of my website.
I also only upload low res images (1024px long side, 100-200kb)

The people who could remove my watermark are NOT the people who are screen-shotting my photos.
It is the kids and their parents who do it to post to their Facebook accounts or their mobile phones.
They don't care that the watermark is their - it is just not even a consideration for them.

I'm not concerned about them doing this and my watermark makes it clear where they go the photo = advertising and "brand awareness"
To get a print or a "clean" image they need to come to me so I see it as a win-win situation.
They get a screen only photo and I get brand awareness and the print/digital orders.


From the "Land Down Under" ... South Australia

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Nov 14, 2015 08:21 |  #5

tim wrote in post #17781543 (external link)
From memory, according to USA copyright laws if someone actively removes a watermark it hugely increases their financial penalty. It also makes stealing the photo a bit more difficult.

From Carolyn E Wright's blog: (external link) Section 1202 of the U.S. Copyright Act makes it illegal for someone to remove the watermark from your photo so that it can disguise the infringement when used. The fines start at $2500 and go to $25,000 in addition to attorneys' fees and any damages for the infringement. And you don't have to have registered your photo in advance to recover under this statute.
The pertinent part of the statute is included the link.

And if someone actually wants to buy it, they might be able to use it to find you. ;)


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ThreeHounds
Goldmember
Avatar
1,369 posts
Gallery: 129 photos
Likes: 3724
Joined Mar 2014
Location: Tallahassee, Florida, USA
     
Nov 14, 2015 16:37 |  #6

PhotosGuy wrote in post #17783365 (external link)
From Carolyn E Wright's blog: (external link) Section 1202 of the U.S. Copyright Act makes it illegal for someone to remove the watermark from your photo so that it can disguise the infringement when used. The fines start at $2500 and go to $25,000 in addition to attorneys' fees and any damages for the infringement. And you don't have to have registered your photo in advance to recover under this statute.
The pertinent part of the statute is included the link.

And if someone actually wants to buy it, they might be able to use it to find you. ;)

These are my reasons.


5D MkIII | 7D | Bronica ETRS
EF 24-105 f/4 L | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | EF 17-40 f/4 L | EF 70-300 f/4 L | Sigma 35 f/1.4 Art | Zenzanon 105 f/3.5 | Tamron SP90 f/2.8 Di Macro VC USM
flickr (external link)
Blanton James Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Nov 14, 2015 16:41 |  #7

Heya,

I do it these days for one big reason: indexing.

Your email, any where you show an image on an internet connection, engines are indexing and collecting them. They're in places you'd never look. They're in ads in other countries. People use search engines as "stock images" for free. Maybe not where you are noticing, but in other areas. It happens all the time. I've found my own image in an add in a Chinese ad (I know it's mine because it was a freaking selfie with headphones, lol). There's nothing you can do to stop it really. But you can watermark it so it's either difficult, or not usable by some (I don't use the kind of watermarks that absolutely render an image hard to even look at though). But it's at least a small barrier in some ways. Really though, I do it because of this, and I know it can be removed with editing, but if someone is willing to do that, they take the risks (assuming they're under the laws you're under; not all are and there's nothing you can do in some countries). If it's posted on the web, in any way, even in an email that is not encrypted, it's indexed and out there.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,568 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
Do you use watermark
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1510 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.