Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 25 Nov 2015 (Wednesday) 21:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Just for fun: Christmas light bokeh comparison portraits

 
MatthewK
Cream of the Crop
5,294 posts
Gallery: 1093 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 16867
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Post edited over 7 years ago by MatthewK.
     
Nov 25, 2015 21:56 |  #1

Bored here at home at the start of a long weekend, drinking some craft beer (Dominion "Candi" Belgian Tripel.... yummmmm). Decided to take portrait shots (on 5D3, hand held) of my girlfriend using each of my lenses wide open, at unique focal lengths (for the zooms). It's interesting to observe how each lens compares in terms of sharpness, clarity, and bokeh. I tried to keep Tiff in frame along w/ some Christmas lights, so perspective isn't maintained, but that wasn't an aim of this session.

Lighting: Phillips Hue LED bulbs, Christmas lights, and some standard overhead track lighting. And my TV was on w/ some screen saver playing, which is helping to create some bokeh.

24L II

IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/755/23230023751_63baf6558c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/BoKW​JT  (external link) Wide open - Canon 24mm f/1.4 L II (external link) by M K (external link), on Flickr

50L
IMAGE: https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5687/23204320422_a06a0037c5.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/Bmud​33  (external link) Wide open - Canon 50mm f/1.2L (external link) by M K (external link), on Flickr

100L
IMAGE: https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5770/22684246834_2c274703c0.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/AywG​h3  (external link) Wide open - Canon 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro (external link) by M K (external link), on Flickr

16-35 f/4L IS @ 16mm
IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/672/22944696579_2849b2d4d5.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/AXxy​UT  (external link) Wide open @ 16mm - Canon 16-35mm f/4L IS (external link) by M K (external link), on Flickr

24-70 f/2.8L II @ 70mm
IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/666/23286507316_8234e1b7d4.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/BtKr​ks  (external link) Wide open @ 70mm - Canon 24-70 f/2.8L II (external link) by M K (external link), on Flickr

70-200 f/2.8L II IS @ 200mm
IMAGE: https://farm1.staticflickr.com/641/22685506263_20887963d7.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/AyD9​Ek  (external link) Wide open @ 200mm - Canon 70-200 f/2.8L II (external link) by M K (external link), on Flickr

Rankings:

Bokeh:

1) 50L
2) 70-200
3) 100L
4) 24-70
5) 24L
6) 16-35 f/4

50L melts things, 24L is surprisingly nice w/ most rounded balls, 16-35 @ 16mm... what bokeh? (of course I could get better at 35mm) 70-200 compression is awesome. Wide open, everything but the 24L has Stewie football head bokeh.

Sharpness:

1) all but the 50L
2) 50L

Each of the lenses are sharp, and I'd have to give the slight edge to the 24L II in this set of photos. The 50L is detailed, but not as crispy. In day to day use, the 24-70 is a slight cut above the others in this department.

Summary

Obviously the wide angle lenses aren't going to deliver gooey, melty bokeh, but the environmental perspective they deliver can't be overlooked. The 50L... what more can be said that hasn't been said? It liquifies backgrounds and lights, an would be my choice for absolute bokeh creation. The 70-200 is silly too @ 200mm, so go with this if you have the working space.

The 24-70 f/2.8L II, the latest addition to my collection, is one hell of a lens. It's a cut above the others in sharpness, clarity, and versatility. In this session it didn't compare quite as well because it was being shot at ISO 10000 (no IS), so some detail was lost, but most other times I'm just dumbstruck by how stupendous this glass is.

Lastly, Tiffs was a good sport during this session, though she couldn't help but troll me in between shots :love:

IMAGE: https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5772/23232248451_577b10068a.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/BoXm​4M  (external link) Weirdo Tiffs - 24mm f/1.4L II wide open (external link) by M K (external link), on Flickr



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BLD ­ 25
Member
55 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2015
     
Nov 28, 2015 17:02 |  #2

Cool comparison!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
Avatar
3,867 posts
Gallery: 98 photos
Likes: 1136
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Denver, CO
     
Nov 28, 2015 22:57 |  #3

The 16-35 does have a short MFD, so you could generate more background blur. As to bokeh (the quality of the blur), I only tested it a bit and my conclusion was that is was 'OK'. Not sure what that means it terms of your tests, but I agree it is somewhat immaterial and at f4 compared to the 1.4 of the 24L, it would be rare that one would use it that way.

Agree with the rest as far as the lenses I have used (not the 50L or 24L). Folks like the 100L for portraits, but I would use the 50L (from what I have seen) or 70-200 2.8II over that lens.

The 24-70 looks better than I expected since it is not known for good bokeh. I have little experience of that lens so I'm mostly going from what I have seen on the forums.


Edward Jenner
5DIV, M6, GX1 II, Sig15mm FE, 16-35 F4,TS-E 17, TS-E 24, 35 f2 IS, M11-22, M18-150 ,24-105, T45 1.8VC, 70-200 f4 IS, 70-200 2.8 vII, Sig 85 1.4, 100L, 135L, 400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MatthewK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,294 posts
Gallery: 1093 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 16867
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
     
Nov 29, 2015 11:52 |  #4

ejenner wrote in post #17799984 (external link)
The 16-35 does have a short MFD, so you could generate more background blur. As to bokeh (the quality of the blur), I only tested it a bit and my conclusion was that is was 'OK'. Not sure what that means it terms of your tests, but I agree it is somewhat immaterial and at f4 compared to the 1.4 of the 24L, it would be rare that one would use it that way.

Agree with the rest as far as the lenses I have used (not the 50L or 24L). Folks like the 100L for portraits, but I would use the 50L (from what I have seen) or 70-200 2.8II over that lens.

The 24-70 looks better than I expected since it is not known for good bokeh. I have little experience of that lens so I'm mostly going from what I have seen on the forums.

Yeah, the zooms were harder to compare because of the infinite choices of focal length and distance to subject, so I just chose more extremes, and kept it within a standard use scenario... yet, I think I'll try shooting her at MFD @ 16mm, f/4 and will see if she'll let me post the carnival mirror result :-D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,875 views & 3 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Just for fun: Christmas light bokeh comparison portraits
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1881 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.