Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 30 Nov 2015 (Monday) 01:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Any fast wide lenses for Canon SL1?

 
memo90061
Member
168 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2011
     
Nov 30, 2015 01:12 |  #1

Hello!

I just bought a Canon SL1 because I saw a really good deal on Craigslist, and I'm coming from micro four thirds.

I want a fast and semi wide lens for my SL1. I bought the Canon 24mm F2.8, and I like it. I just wish it was faster. I usually shoot wide, and thought about the Sigma 30mm F1.4. I think I would be good with that. Are there any other lenses you would recommend that would still make the SL1 lightweight?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51009
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Nov 30, 2015 01:22 |  #2

memo90061 wrote in post #17801333 (external link)
Hello!

I just bought a Canon SL1 because I saw a really good deal on Craigslist, and I'm coming from micro four thirds.

I want a fast and semi wide lens for my SL1. I bought the Canon 24mm F2.8, and I like it. I just wish it was faster. I usually shoot wide, and thought about the Sigma 30mm F1.4. I think I would be good with that. Are there any other lenses you would recommend that would still make the SL1 lightweight?

Just wondering what you mean by wide. Most would not regard 24mm and 30mm as wide on the SL1. OK, 24 is slightly wide, but 30mm is the normal focal length for an APS-C sensor.

The 10-18mm STM lens is cheap and excellent. However, it is not fast being f/4.5 at the wide end. Maybe you would have to settle for the 17-55mm/2.8. There's also the EF-S 15-85, which is wider at the wide end but only f/3.5.

Why do you need fast? Increase the ISO.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,120 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Nov 30, 2015 02:08 |  #3

You are not going to find a lens that is simultaneously; fast, wide, and small. Two of the three, yes that is possible, although the fast is always going to be expensive. There are options that are f/1.4 at both 24mm (from Canon and Sigma) and 20mm (Sigma) that maintain AF, and there are also some native EF mount MF lenses in that range. All of those lenses though are around £1000, and large and heavy, they pretty much all cover the 35mm frame size too.

If size is an issue then as Archibald says use a slower, smaller designed for APS-c lens, and bump your ISO a stop or two.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 7 years ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Nov 30, 2015 03:09 |  #4

Sigma 18-35 f1.8
Sigma 10-20 f3.5
Tamron 16-28 f2.8
Tokina 11-16 f2.8

Not small lenses but should fit the other criteria


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited over 7 years ago by MalVeauX.
     
Nov 30, 2015 06:25 |  #5

memo90061 wrote in post #17801333 (external link)
Hello!

I just bought a Canon SL1 because I saw a really good deal on Craigslist, and I'm coming from micro four thirds.

I want a fast and semi wide lens for my SL1. I bought the Canon 24mm F2.8, and I like it. I just wish it was faster. I usually shoot wide, and thought about the Sigma 30mm F1.4. I think I would be good with that. Are there any other lenses you would recommend that would still make the SL1 lightweight?

Heya,

Basically no. Anything fast, will be big. Anything light weight, will be slow.

If you want smaller, faster, lighter, and still APS-C, there is the EOS-M (M3) & 22mm F2. That thing is small and fast and sharp.

The 30 F1.4 and 28 F1.8 flavors are the fastest options that are not huge for an APS-C that are relatively wide and quite fast.

There's also the Yongnuo 35 F2 which is pretty small and light weight, it's the size of a nifty-fifty. This is probably the smallest, fastest, widest lens for $100 that will work.

At this point though, if you need your SL1 to be super small, and a lens to be super small, I don't think moving to a dSLR is the right way to go. Unless you needed the larger APS-C sensor coming from M43, for lower light performance, you're not going to get anything significant from it. And the strength of the dSLR is the adaptability of lenses, none of which are small, and they just get bigger and bigger.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Nov 30, 2015 07:57 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

Like Alan said above, fast, wide, and small don't come in one package. The 24 STM is certainly small. It is neither fast, nor wide. The Sigma 20 f/1.4 A is fast, wide, but not small. It weighs considerably more than your SL1. Costs more, too. Fast and wide is the general domain of full frame. Pixels on target at range is the domain of apsc. Small is the domain of P&S, M4/3, superzooms, and the like. Choose your compromise; you can't have it all. Well, not in one camera, anyway. BTW, there is nothing wrong with having more than one camera.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vengence
Goldmember
2,103 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Mar 2013
     
Nov 30, 2015 09:50 |  #7

If you want smaller, faster, lighter, and still APS-C, there is the EOS-M (M3) & 22mm F2. That thing is small and fast and sharp.

This.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,120 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Nov 30, 2015 18:10 |  #8

As Teamspeed mentioned, and I forgot, which is odd as I think one may well be my next lens purchase, there is the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8. But although it is fast and wide to normal, and actually for the focal lengths concerned relatively small, a lot of folks seem to think it is a heavy lens.

Also on crop, 35mm is on the long end of normal, which I would suggest runs to include the 28 to 35mm range. For Canon crop cameras 22mm is the equivalent to the classic FF 35mm focal length. I would really like to see Canon offering a nice f/1.8 or even f/1.4 15mm and 22mm in an EF-s mount for the crop EOS bodies. I am sure there are a lot of folks out there who are shooting 7D's etc because they spend a lot of time focal length limited with long lenses, that would apreciate good lenses in those classic focal length field of views.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
InfiniteDivide
"I wish to be spared"
Avatar
2,844 posts
Gallery: 265 photos
Likes: 221
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Kawasaki, Japan
Post edited over 7 years ago by InfiniteDivide.
     
Dec 02, 2015 05:19 |  #9

As others have mentioned for small the 24mm f2.8 is great.

For me. I had a 50 f1.4 lens, loved to thin dog and wanted wider.
Rather than compromising on speed, I saved up my cash and bought the 24L II f1.4

On my T4i it weighed a ton but man was it exactly what I wanted. Much wider than my 50mm and just as fast.

If you are not happy with the new 24mm f2.8 pancake. There are few option except for the ones already listed.


James Patrus
6D | 16-35L F4 | 24L II | 50L | 100L | |  -> Website (external link) & Gallery (external link)
Do you enjoy Super Famicom games? (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M_Six
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,845 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Dec 2010
Location: East Central IL
Post edited over 7 years ago by M_Six.
     
Dec 02, 2015 18:00 |  #10

Another vote for the Siggy 18-35 f1.8. It's (relatively) wide and very fast. "Small" is a relative term. It's no pancake for sure and it has some heft. It's not going to ruin your shoulder walking around with it all day, though.

If you're looking to keep the camera and lens pocketable (large coat pockets), then the 24mm f2.8 pancake is your best option.

Here's a shot with the Siggy 18-35mm f1.8 on an SL1.

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7434/15794706273_4d05e1473e_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/q4HZ​TX  (external link) Holy Name Cathedral (external link) by Mark Johnson (external link), on Flickr

Mark J.
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BLD ­ 25
Member
55 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2015
     
Dec 07, 2015 12:16 |  #11

M_Six wrote in post #17805151 (external link)
Another vote for the Siggy 18-35 f1.8. It's (relatively) wide and very fast. "Small" is a relative term. It's no pancake for sure and it has some heft. It's not going to ruin your shoulder walking around with it all day, though.

If you're looking to keep the camera and lens pocketable (large coat pockets), then the 24mm f2.8 pancake is your best option.

Here's a shot with the Siggy 18-35mm f1.8 on an SL1.

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/q4HZ​TX  (external link) Holy Name Cathedral (external link) by Mark Johnson (external link), on Flickr

That is beautiful!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,763 views & 1 like for this thread, 10 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Any fast wide lenses for Canon SL1?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1472 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.